This paper examines the conflict between Gypsy Moth (Lymantria dispar) control efforts and the survival of the Diana fritillary butterfly (Speyeria diana) in the Carolina landscape. It discusses how invasive Gypsy Moth populations cause widespread defoliation that threatens forested habitats critical to the Diana fritillary, while common control methods—particularly Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki (Btk) spraying—may directly harm fritillary larvae. The paper considers topographic features, federal land regulations, Environmental Impact Statement requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act, and strategic spray timing as factors in developing an ecologically sound and legally compliant treatment plan.
The Gypsy Moth is an exotic pest and invasive species that feeds on the leaves in the middle branches and crowns of trees. While populations tend to persist at low levels in some areas for extended periods, sudden and as yet unexplained population explosions can lead to massive defoliations (Liebhold 2003). Speyeria diana, commonly known as the Diana fritillary, is a butterfly species that inhabits the northwest counties of South Carolina and certain surrounding areas, with recent evidence suggesting that populations might be more widespread than previously thought. Unlike many other fritillary species, the Diana fritillary primarily populates wooded and shaded areas (Scholtens n.d.). The overlap of these two species is fraught with complications that threaten the survival of the Diana fritillary.
There are several significant environmental issues that must be considered when addressing the effects of defoliation on the Diana fritillary in the region and when developing a treatment plan to deal with the Gypsy Moth population. As an invasive and destructive species, the protection of Gypsy Moth populations is not a cause for consideration; however, typical methods for controlling Gypsy Moth population growth and spread have been shown to have a direct impact on Diana fritillary populations (Scholtens n.d.; Liebhold 2003). Closer examination and careful consideration of these issues is therefore necessary in treatment plan development.
Forested areas in the region occupied by Diana fritillary butterflies are already fairly limited and face numerous threats from direct and indirect human activity as well as other environmental pressures (National Park Service n.d.; Sterner n.d.). Maintaining forested areas should be the primary consideration in the development of a treatment plan for restoring and sustaining Diana fritillary populations; however, the impact of various reforestation and defoliation prevention methods must also be weighed. Human population centers should be analyzed and factored into the plan, as should wind patterns and other influences that can cause the spread of both moth larvae and the bacterial species used to control them (Liebhold 2003; Scholtens n.d.). A thorough consideration of environmental factors will lead to more effective treatment responses and landscape restoration efforts.
Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki (Btk) is a naturally occurring bacterium that functions effectively as an insecticide and has been used to control the growth and spread of Gypsy Moth populations for several decades with considerable success (Liebhold 2003; Scholtens n.d.). Some research has suggested, however, that Diana fritillary larvae may be especially susceptible to Btk infections, and that populations could be decimated by the widespread use of this control technique (Scholtens n.d.). The key challenge lies in finding a balance between using Btk to control Gypsy Moth populations and prevent further defoliation while simultaneously protecting native species like the Diana fritillary.
Because the research indicates susceptibility to Btk only during the larval stage of the Diana fritillary, spraying during other periods of the butterfly's life cycle could potentially avoid negative impacts on Speyeria diana populations while still exerting control over Gypsy Moth spread and growth (Scholtens n.d.; Liebhold 2003). Additional assistance is provided by prevailing weather patterns: current Gypsy Moth populations remain considerably north of known Diana fritillary populations, and given the configuration of prevailing fronts, these more southerly populations should not be affected by Btk use in northern areas (Scholtens n.d.). Spraying during early summer—when the Diana fritillary is in its adult stage and well before larvae emerge from eggs in the fall—and concentrating spraying in the areas of North Carolina and Virginia where Gypsy Moths currently exist should form an effective strategy for preventing the spread of the moths into Diana fritillary territory to the south (Scholtens n.d.).
"Landscape topography guides targeted pest control areas"
"NEPA, EPA oversight, and federal land compliance"
The control of the Gypsy Moth population in the Eastern United States has been a long-running issue since the introduction of the species. The threat the Gypsy Moth represents to the Diana fritillary butterfly is both direct and indirect, and moth population control methods can themselves be harmful to the Diana fritillary. Careful consideration of landscape issues, biological timing, topographic features, and federal regulatory requirements is essential in the development of an effective and legally compliant treatment plan.
You’re 60% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.