Hagar and Ishmael in Genesis: Exclusion, Ethics, and Meaning
This essay critically examines the narrative of Hagar and Ishmael in Genesis 16 and 21, focusing on the ethical and theological issues raised by their exclusion from Abraham's household. The paper poses honest questions about consent, divine silence, and paternal responsibility before applying Augustine's hermeneutic of charity to explore charitable interpretations of the key figures' actions. It then contextualizes the narrative within ancient Near Eastern law codes, including Hammurabi's laws and the Nuzi texts, and traces the symbolic significance of Hagar and Ishmael in relation to the New Testament promise. The essay concludes with a personal reflection connecting the biblical narrative to the author's own experience as a Black, Caribbean immigrant woman and single mother.
- Introduction: Overview of Hagar's narrative and essay approach
- Questions Arising from the Narrative: Ethical questions on consent, divine silence, paternal love
- Extending Charity: Augustine's Hermeneutic Applied: Charitable readings of Sarah, Abraham, and Hagar's expulsion
- Contextualizing the Narrative in Ancient Law and Symbolism: Hammurabi, Nuzi law, and typological symbolism of Christ
- Personal Application of the Text: Author connects Hagar's story to personal immigrant experience
- Conclusion: Synthesis of justice, faith, and biblical relevance
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper moves through a coherent methodological sequence — posing ethical questions, applying a named hermeneutic framework, contextualizing in ancient law, and then reflecting personally — giving the argument clear forward momentum.
- The use of Augustine's hermeneutic of charity as an explicit analytical lens demonstrates engagement with theological methodology rather than simple moral judgment, adding academic rigor to an emotionally resonant subject.
- The personal reflection section is unusually candid and connects abstract biblical themes to lived experience in a way that models contextual, embodied reading of Scripture.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper exemplifies contextual biblical interpretation: it reads the Genesis narrative against its ancient Near Eastern legal background (Hammurabi's code, Nuzi tablets) while simultaneously applying a patristic hermeneutical principle (Augustine's charity). This layered approach — historical-critical context plus interpretive framework plus personal application — is a hallmark of theological studies methodology.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with an introduction establishing the significance of the Hagar narrative, followed by a section of pointed ethical questions about consent, divine silence, and parental responsibility. A third section applies Augustine's hermeneutic of charity to offer non-judgmental readings of each character's actions. The fourth section situates the story within ancient law codes and develops its typological symbolism pointing toward Christ. The final section applies the narrative personally, with the author drawing parallels between Hagar's experience and her own life as a Black immigrant single mother.
Introduction
There is little doubt that the Old Testament in the Christian Bible is of vital significance, especially concerning the individual narratives in Genesis. These stories have been cherished from a young age. Even though these narratives hold great importance in a Christian's life, they also pose some critical issues, particularly in the current social context of the twenty-first century.1 One such issue is found in the narrative of Hagar, the handmaid in Abraham's household who bore him his first son, Ishmael.
This essay offers a critical assessment of that issue, focusing on the exclusion of Hagar and Ishmael from Abraham's narrative and their expulsion from the homestead after Sarah — Abraham's wife — realized she was expecting a child. The analysis proceeds by first posing some honest and ethical questions, then applying Augustine's hermeneutic of charity, creating a conversation from that framework, and finally responding to the text against its historical and cultural background.
Questions Arising from the Narrative
For many people, Scripture is holy, and examining characters or questioning God's actions in its stories is considered taboo. However, the Hebrew Scriptures as presented in the Bible are both the national history of the Hebrew people and a profound religious account of those people's experiences with God — who, according to both the Quran and the Bible, is understood to be the God of both Christians and Muslims.2
The Old Testament accounts do not always measure up to the ideals of the real world, and in twenty-first century society, to the ideals of good neighborliness and common humanity. In the context of Hagar's narrative and how she and her son were treated within Abraham's household, the reader is compelled to ask: what are the injustices that Hagar and Ishmael experienced at the hands of Sarah? And more specifically, what does "terror" mean in this context?
From Genesis 16 to 21, from Hagar's standpoint, there is what today's reader would recognize as a profound injustice. Hagar was used, and her rights were violated in a deliberately dehumanizing manner. With Sarah's permission, Abraham went into her with the intention of fathering a child. The text, however, never gives the reader Hagar's opinion — nor any indication of whether she consented. In any sexual relationship, both parties must be adults and must freely consent. This raises a pointed question: did Hagar consent to the sexual relationship with Abraham? And does the absence of that consent constitute sexual molestation by a master of his servant?
Up to this point in the narrative, Abraham's life had been guided by the voice of God. It was God who had instructed him to leave his birthplace — Ur — and journey to a land where God would establish him and make him a father of many nations, Canaan. God had spoken explicitly about the promise of making him the father of nations. It is therefore striking that, in this particular instance, God's voice is absent. This raises further questions: why is the voice of God missing in the matter of Hagar and Ishmael? Why did Abraham not seek God's counsel on the matter? And why did God allow Sarah and Abraham to send away his firstborn child, Ishmael, born of Hagar?
Throughout history, men have treasured their firstborn children, and especially their firstborn sons. Ishmael was Abraham's first son. According to the covenant with God, Abraham was to circumcise every male in his household; for newborn boys, this rite was to be performed on the eighth day. Yet throughout the narrative, there is no explicit indication that Ishmael was circumcised. This raises yet another question: did Abraham truly love his child? Did the fact that the child was not born of his lawfully wedded wife — Sarah — diminish his paternal love for Ishmael? Equally significant is the absence of any record of God communicating with Abraham specifically about this child, which invites the question: what was God's view on Abraham fathering a child through Sarah's handmaid?
Bibliography
Clewis, Robert. "Augustine's Hermeneutics." Auslegung: A Journal of Philosophy 24, no. 1 (2001): 65–87.
Gunkel, H. "The Two Accounts of Hagar. (Genesis XVI. and XXI., 8–21.)." The Monist 10, no. 3 (1900): 321–42.
Noble, John Travis. "Let Ishmael Live Before You!" Finding a Place for Hagar's Son in the Priestly Tradition. Diss. 2013.
Okoye, James C. "Sarah and Hagar: Genesis 16 and 21." Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 32, no. 2 (2007): 163–175.
Wimbush, Vincent L. "Reading Texts as Reading Ourselves: A Chapter in the History of African American Biblical Interpretation." In Fernando Segovia and Mary Ann Tolbert (eds.), Reading from This Place. I. Social Location and Biblical Interpretation in the United States. Augsburg: Fortress Press, 1993, pp. 95–108.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.