This paper offers a summary and critique of Donna Freitas's 2017 book, The Happiness Effect: How Social Media Is Driving a Generation to Appear Perfect at Any Cost. Drawing on Freitas's interviews and surveys of college students across multiple campuses, the paper traces her key findings—including the pressure to project happiness online, the rise of selfie culture, sexting, smartphone addiction, and fear of cancel culture. The critique examines the consistency, validity, and adequacy of Freitas's arguments, ultimately finding that while the book succeeds as an empathetic portrait of young people navigating social media, it falls short by failing to make a direct, forceful case for reducing or abandoning social media use altogether.
This paper demonstrates the technique of evaluative critique grounded in a stated framework. Rather than simply summarizing or disagreeing emotionally, the writer establishes upfront what standards will be applied (consistency, validity, adequacy) and then measures the book against each. This approach gives the critique intellectual structure and allows the writer to make fair, specific judgments rather than broad dismissals.
The paper follows a classic book-review structure: a brief introduction stating the thesis, a thorough summary covering the book's major themes, a multi-part critique assessing argument strength and gaps, and a concise conclusion. The critique section is the longest and most developed, divided between acknowledging the book's methodology and pressing the case for a stronger authorial stance — a logical and effective organizational choice.
The Happiness Effect by Freitas (2017) is a story about young people and their use of social media — and its impact on their lives — told largely in their own words. It is a probing and sensitive examination of a techno-cultural phenomenon unlike anything seen before in human history, and Freitas takes care to allow those participating in this phenomenon to provide their own perspectives on it. This paper summarizes and critiques the book and examines the consistency, validity, and adequacy of the author's arguments. While the book offers important insight, it comes up short in directly addressing the ultimate issue: that social media is more of a burden and a problem than a tool, and that young people need to know they are better off without it.
Freitas (2017) explores the love-hate relationship that young people have with social media by surveying and interviewing students across a number of different college campuses. The central idea of the book is to show that young people struggle with the demands social media places on them: they feel they must do everything possible to appear happy and successful online. They also worry that posting the wrong thing may be used against them later in life. This latter point is especially significant in the age of cancel culture, where a tweet or Facebook post from years ago can end up costing a person their career.
The fear young people experience is understandable, and Freitas (2017) pays special attention to it throughout the work. The book begins by examining how young people feel social media obliges them to display the "good times," creating a sense of envy and competition — a desire to show that "I'm in a better place than you are and I want to prove that to you and show you that I'm extremely happy" (p. 16). Freitas brings the students she meets to life so that the reader can visualize them as real people with real pressures.
The author also discusses Facebook Cleanups, which are taught to young students so they know not to post anything offensive online that might come back to haunt them. Students actually learn this lesson in high school; they are aware "how important it is to watch what you say online because you never know who is keeping an eye on you" (p. 53). Young people are essentially being groomed to accept cancel culture and to play along with its rules.
There is also a discussion of selfie culture. One young person interviewed explains how she used to hate the idea of selfies and believed people posted them merely to gain attention and likes. However, she eventually began taking and posting them herself, justifying the practice as a way of making herself feel good. Essentially, she admits to caving to the pressure to be vain — even if she does not say so in those exact words. Her actions are indicative of a broader trend among young people to embrace vanity under peer pressure. As Freitas (2017) writes, "for Elise, selfies offer a way to capture a moment when you are feeling attractive and good about yourself" (p. 83). The behavior is justified as an expression of identity — as though one's identity depended on others noticing and potentially approving. It is identity rooted in vanity, however one interprets it, and self-described selfie-haters, as Freitas points out, tend to recognize this more readily than selfie-lovers.
Another topic covered is live-streaming and using social media to open oneself up to others. The book also addresses sexting — using social media to engage in sexual activity with others — noting that some young people grow out of it and others grow further into it. The same justification tends to recur: the person sexting does not see a problem with it because "he sees social media as just another outlet to express himself" (p. 205). Freitas goes on to discuss how young people have become addicted to their smartphones — unable to get through a day without spending significant amounts of time on them. One young person interviewed claimed his phone did not get in the way of what was essential to him, but in doing so essentially revealed that "his phone is essential" (p. 223).
The author concludes that social media is here to stay, and that the question is how adults can help young people deal with it. Ultimately, she states: "we may simply need to stop using social media as a place to measure, judge, and evaluate" (p. 275). However, there is no firm argument to abandon social media altogether — the author comes up short on that matter.
The Happiness Effect by Freitas (2017) does a good job of placing the reader in the shoes of young people caught up in the social media phenomenon of today's techno-culture. It shows what they are thinking, feeling, and experiencing, and how they are affected by it all. However, it does not do enough in the way of making a loud, compelling argument for stepping away from social media altogether. Instead, the author offers the reader a weak challenge to unplug for a little while and see what happens. For all its empathy and insight, the book ultimately stops short of delivering the clear-eyed message that young people most need to hear.
Freitas, D. (2017). The happiness effect: How social media is driving a generation to appear perfect at any cost. Oxford University Press.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.