Challenges Facing Youth Who Age Out of Foster Care
This paper examines the multifaceted challenges confronting youth who age out of the foster care system in the United States. Drawing on empirical research, it explores how prior homelessness, teenage pregnancy, criminal justice involvement, and racial disparities intersect to increase housing instability among former foster youth. The paper also addresses the growing shortage of foster parents — driven largely by adversarial relationships with oversight agencies — and the organizational dysfunction within foster care programs, including worker burnout and compassion fatigue. Together, these factors compound the difficulties younger youth face when transitioning into adulthood, and the paper identifies protective factors such as simultaneous school attendance and employment that support more successful outcomes.
- Introduction: Overview of foster care transition challenges and paper scope
- Difficulty in Securing Stable Housing: Statistical predictors of homelessness among foster youth
- Risk Factors and Racial Disparities: Race, justice involvement, and compounding vulnerability factors
- Shortage of Foster Parents: Regulatory burden reducing available foster families
- Ineffective Organizational Culture: Worker burnout and trauma impairing service delivery
- Conclusion: Synthesis of systemic barriers to successful transition
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds its claims in quantitative research findings, citing specific statistics such as R-squared values and probability ratios to lend empirical weight to the argument.
- Covers multiple systemic levels — individual youth risk factors, family environment, foster parent supply, and organizational culture — giving readers a comprehensive picture of the issue.
- Balances problem identification with mitigation strategies, noting trade school partnerships and individualized case management as practical responses.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses a risk-factor framework to structure its argument, systematically identifying variables (prior homelessness, race, household composition, criminal history) and explaining how they interact to compound disadvantage. This cumulative-risk approach is common in social-work and public-health research and allows the author to move logically from individual-level factors to systemic recommendations.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a theoretical framing of adolescent brain development and the influence of social media, then moves through three substantive sections: housing instability and its statistical predictors, the foster parent shortage driven by regulatory burden, and organizational failures such as worker PTSD and compassion fatigue. A brief conclusion synthesizes these threads. References follow APA formatting throughout.
Introduction
Although well intentioned, the foster care system often places youth in a precarious position once they age out of the program. Evidence suggests that foster care youth frequently experience trouble securing stable housing, difficulty juggling work and school responsibilities, and challenges to their overall healthy development. These issues also harm foster care youth in their ability to properly matriculate into society. Other problems related to the foster care system itself — along with social workers and practitioners — further complicate its application. Practitioners are often ill-equipped to handle the overall transition of adolescents, and may lack the experience needed to properly assess and assist foster care youth as they move into adulthood. These elements coalesce into an adverse circumstance in which many foster youth are subjected to harsh conditions immediately after leaving care. Complexities related to the individuals who originally cared for the foster child can also contribute to adverse outcomes; the caregiver's beliefs, personality, and living environment can all have a negative impact on the youth (ACF, 2017).
Research has shown that adolescents are the most malleable during their early teenage years. Parents, communities, peers, and social media can have a direct impact on how foster care youth perform in life (Bauman, 2006). Because the brain is still developing, stimuli from multiple sources can influence the perceptions and thought processes of foster care youth. Social media exacerbates these circumstances by contributing to information silos, distorted perceptions of success, and harmful dialogue. Due to these influences, it is the contention of this paper that foster care youth are adversely impacted by the current system. Furthermore, older youth — who benefit from greater life experience and more advanced brain development — fare considerably better than their younger counterparts. This ultimately provides a template for identifying which youth will succeed as they transfer out of foster care and which will struggle.
A review of the research reveals a common thread uniting successful foster care students and distinguishing them from unsuccessful ones (Benach, 2014). These threads often coalesce into a standard philosophy that can be adapted to suit the individual needs of foster care participants. First, research has shown that successful foster care students are able to handle and manage multiple tasks simultaneously (Bender, 2015). Many were able to balance both school and work as a means of creating a stable lifestyle. It is also important for foster care parents to provide an inclusive and engaging environment designed to help develop the child's innate abilities (Berzin, 2011). Such an environment offers the stability in which learning and development can occur. The difficulty is that many younger individuals in foster care do not experience this kind of environment — particularly when compared to older foster care participants who are further along in their cognitive development. Finally, the social workers themselves, along with their overall employment environment, can contribute to adverse circumstances for both foster care students and those who seek to support them. Each of these issues will be discussed in detail in the sections that follow, with care taken to present both sides of the prevailing research so that readers may evaluate the merit of each argument (Blome, 1997).
References
ACF (2017). Number of children in foster care continues to increase. Administration for Children and Families. Washington, DC: Children's Bureau.
ACF (2019). The AFCARS Report #26. Administration for Children and Families. Washington, DC: Children's Bureau. Retrieved from
Adams, E., Hassett, A., & Lumsden, V. (2018). What do we know about the impact of stress on foster carers and contributing factors? Adoption & Fostering, 42(4), 338–353.
Ahn, H., Greeno, E. J., Bright, C. L., Hartzel, S., & Reiman, S. (2017). A survival analysis of the length of foster parenting duration and implications for recruitment.
Bauman, L., Silver, E., & Stein, R. (2006). Cumulative social disadvantage and child health. Pediatrics, 117(4), 1321–1328.
Benach, J., Vives, A., Amable, M., Vanroelen, C., Tarafa, G., & Muntaner, C. (2014). Precarious employment: Understanding an emerging social determinant of health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 229–253.
Bender, K., Yang, J., Ferguson, K., & Thompson, S. (2015). Experiences and needs of homeless youth with a history of foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 55(August), 222–231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.06.007
Berzin, S. C., Rhodes, A. M., & Curtis, M. A. (2011). Housing experiences of former foster youth: How do they fare in comparison to other youth? Children and Youth Services Review, 33(11), 2119–2126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.06.018
Blome, W. W. (1997). What happens to foster kids: Educational experiences of a random sample of foster care youth and a matched group of non-foster youth. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 14(1), 41–53.
Brown, A., Courtney, M. E., & McMillen, J. C. (2015). Behavioral health needs and service use among those who have aged out of foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 58, 163–169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.09.020
Osgood, D. W., Foster, E. M., & Courtney, M. E. (2010). Vulnerable populations and the transition to adulthood. The Future of Children, 20(1), 209–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/foc.0.0047
Padgett, D. K. (2006). Housing first services for people who are homeless with co-occurring serious mental illness and substance abuse. Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 74–83.
Pecora, P. J., Kessler, R. C., O'Brien, K., White, C. R., Williams, J., Hiripi, E., & Herrick, M. A. (2006). Educational and employment outcomes of adults formerly placed in foster care: Results from the Northwest Foster Care Alumni Study. Children and Youth Services Review.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.