This paper analyzes Nathaniel Hawthorne's short story "The Birthmark," examining how Aylmer's obsessive desire to remove his wife Georgiana's birthmark exposes his lack of genuine love and his hunger for dominion over nature and God. The essay argues that the birthmark functions as a symbol of Georgiana's heritage, dignity, and the inherent beauty found in imperfection. Through close reading of key passages, the paper demonstrates how Hawthorne embeds feminist commentary into the narrative, showing that Aylmer's fatal pursuit of perfection ultimately destroys the very thing he claims to love.
A "man of science," Aylmer eagerly wants to remove his wife's birthmark. "Georgiana," he says, "has it never occurred to you that the mark upon your cheek might be removed?" Georgiana responds by telling her husband that, to her and to many others who have known her, the mark is a "charm" — something of inherent value, worth, and beauty. The mark is also a sign of Georgiana's heritage: the mark of her birth. Therefore, when Aylmer calls the birthmark a "defect," Georgiana retorts, "You cannot love what shocks you!" In Hawthorne's story, this opening confrontation establishes the central conflict between a husband who sees imperfection as something to be corrected and a wife who understands her birthmark as an expression of who she is.
The birthmark illustrates Aylmer's lack of genuine love for his wife. Ironically, it is he who bears the mark of imperfection by wishing so hard that his wife were a different person. He obsesses about removing the birthmark, focusing on it at the expense of appreciating any other part of her. Georgiana's personality appears perfect in comparison, her birthmark a sign of her dignity. As Nathaniel Hawthorne constructs her character, Georgiana represents a wholeness that her husband is incapable of perceiving.
To Aylmer, the birthmark represents more than an annoyance. He "possessed this degree of faith in man's ultimate control over Nature" and viewed the mark as an opportunity to demonstrate his dominion over Nature. Instead of appreciating Georgiana, Aylmer sought to transform her — to change an essential part of her being. As the narrator states, the mark was "deeply interwoven, as it were, with the texture and substance of her face." This detail underscores that what Aylmer wishes to erase is not a surface blemish but a constitutive element of Georgiana's identity. The story thus engages broader American Romantic anxieties about the dangers of placing scientific ambition above human feeling and natural order.
"Hawthorne critiques male power; perfection destroys"
You’re 70% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.