This paper analyzes the role of contract workers in the healthcare industry, examining why organizations increasingly turn to temporary staffing as an alternative to full-time employment. It outlines the key financial and operational benefits of hiring contract workers — including reduced benefit costs, lower overhead, and access to specialized skills — while also addressing significant drawbacks such as lack of loyalty, wasted training, inconsistency, and safety concerns. The paper further explores real-world controversy surrounding healthcare contract workers, drawing on a notable case that raised questions about industry hiring and screening practices. It concludes with recommendations for more rigorous background checks and reporting protocols to protect patient safety.
The paper demonstrates the use of a real-world case (the Kwiatkowski incident) to illustrate systemic policy and management issues. Rather than treating the case as a mere anecdote, the author connects it to broader questions about hiring practices, background screening, and inter-agency communication — showing how a single event can be used to support structural recommendations.
The paper follows a clear problem-analysis-recommendation structure: it opens by defining contract workers and establishing industry trends, moves through a point-by-point benefit and drawback analysis, introduces a high-profile controversy to add urgency, and closes with practical recommendations and a concise conclusion. This logical progression makes the argument easy to follow and is well suited for a business or health policy topic at the undergraduate level.
This paper analyzes the role of healthcare contract workers, discussing the reasons they are hired by various organizations and the advantages that companies gain by appointing temporary employees. As with every issue, there are two sides: the disadvantages of this arrangement are also examined. Contract workers face many controversies while working within organizations. Companies are often reluctant to invest heavily in temporary employees, believing resources may be wasted, which means contract workers must largely fend for themselves. They frequently encounter reliability concerns, and permanent employees do not always extend them full trust. This paper provides an overall analysis of the difficulties faced by temporary employees, their role in organizational success, and offers recommendations to companies that hire them.
A contract worker is a person who is temporarily employed for a limited period of time based on certain terms and conditions set by the organization. These employees may be engaged directly by the employer or through private staffing agencies. Agencies sometimes hire and train temporary employees and then place them with employers. Contract workers are also commonly referred to as fixed-term employees, meaning they are hired at specified rates for a defined period.
More and more companies are hiring contract workers rather than permanent employees. The temporary placement service provider Adecco predicts that the growth rate of contract workers will be three to four times greater than that of traditional workforces, eventually making up approximately 25% of the workforce (Erickson, 2012).
In many sectors, businesses and organizations must carefully weigh the benefits and drawbacks of hiring independent contract workers rather than full-time employees. This is an important decision for business owners, and there are several key considerations that illustrate the advantages of hiring an independent contract worker.
Reduced Benefit Costs: By hiring contract workers, the costs associated with benefits such as vacation pay, sick leave, and retirement plans are eliminated. One of the largest savings comes from health insurance: in the United States, providing health insurance for a single employee costs approximately $6,000 per year. This figure varies depending on the employee's age and medical condition, but it remains one of the most significant costs associated with direct employment. Companies can avoid these costs by hiring contract workers instead.
Business Costs Only Increase During Growth: When hiring contract workers, employers pay only for services when they are actually needed. This provides flexibility during growth periods, which is of great importance to a company's cash flow.
More Employees Means More Responsibility: Human resources management is one of the most time-consuming functions in any business. The more employees a company has, the more difficult they become to manage. Because contract workers are self-employed and are motivated to excel, they typically require little or no management oversight.
Reduced Overhead: Payroll processing, taxes, and other overhead expenses are reduced when contract workers are hired. There is also a hidden cost to firing employees that many employers overlook: whenever an employer terminates a worker, the unemployment tax rate can increase for all remaining employees. Using contract workers helps mitigate this risk.
Specialized Skills: Another significant advantage of hiring contract workers — particularly in healthcare — is that they tend to be highly specialized. This allows the contract worker to focus on what they do best, providing immediate value to the organization without the learning curve associated with generalist employees.
Hiring contract workers is an excellent solution during unpredictable economic times. Most business owners rely on knowledgeable contract workers to fill gaps where needed. Contract workers can become an ongoing part of the team without the overhead cost of hiring them directly (Hutton, 2011).
While contract workers can be beneficial in certain contexts, there are a number of well-documented disadvantages associated with their use.
Temporary workers often lack loyalty and motivation toward the organization, partly because of the short duration of their assignments. Without incentives such as bonuses or opportunities for promotion, they may be primarily motivated by their paycheck rather than by the company's broader success.
Training temporary workers to complete tasks specific to the organization can go to waste if the contract worker does not return for a subsequent placement. During the training period, contract workers often require significant manpower and resources, representing a potential loss of revenue if they do not stay.
Contract workers may lack consistency — they may not arrive on time or may fail to report for scheduled shifts altogether. A contract worker who arrives with a negative or unproductive attitude can have a significant adverse effect on the organization.
Permanent employees may be reluctant to work alongside contract workers who are unfamiliar with specific tasks or internal processes. They may be unwilling to guide or train temporary workers, viewing such efforts as a poor use of their time when working with someone who may not remain with the organization.
Many healthcare jobs are inherently dangerous and require careful safety training. Studies show that the frequency of on-the-job injuries is higher among contract workers. Regardless of a worker's level of experience, proper safety protocols must be enforced to ensure that dangerous tasks are performed correctly.
There is a widely held assumption that temporary workers are less reliable than permanent employees. Research supports this view: the occurrence of on-the-job injuries is higher among temporary workers, and issues such as poor attendance and lack of commitment further undermine their reliability compared to permanent staff (Schaefer, 2005).
Hiring contract workers is both beneficial and an excellent solution during times of economic crisis for the healthcare industry. In order to avoid controversies that damage the reputations of both workers and hospitals, the industry must exercise extra caution during the hiring process. Hospitals should maintain complete background records for all employees and ensure that contract workers receive proper training for the roles they are assigned. Ultimately, the success of any employee — temporary or permanent — depends significantly on how well the organization integrates and supports them.
Dawe, T. (n.d.). What are the disadvantages of hiring temporary workers?
Erickson, T. (2012, September 7). The rise of the new contract worker. Harvard Business Review.
Hutton, S. (2011, July 25). Advantages of hiring contract employees: Solutions to controlling employee costs in unpredictable economic times.
Schaefer, P. (2005). The pros and cons of hiring temporary employees. Business Know-How.
Wilson, J. (2012, August 3). Controversy surrounds healthcare contract workers. CNN.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.