This essay critiques narrowly defined and strictly enforced high school codes of conduct, using specific examples from the Denison High School Code of Conduct in Iowa and similar policies. It examines how zero-tolerance rules around tobacco and alcohol use can exceed legal limits on individual freedom, disproportionately affect at-risk students, and prove counterproductive by excluding students from school life rather than engaging them. The paper contrasts these rigid policies with the Colorado High School Activities Association's principle-based Code of Ethics, arguing that broader ethical guidelines allow for fairer, more realistic student evaluation and better serve the educational goals that codes of conduct are meant to support.
There seems to be a belief among many educators, administrators, and even students that narrowly defined and strictly enforced codes of conduct promote better education and even greater student expression in educational settings. Though there is some validity to this belief, there are also many ways in which such codes can go too far. One such example can be found in the Denison High School Code of Conduct in Iowa. There are several instances where, according to this code, punishments issued by the school are harsher than those prescribed by law — for instance, even an eighteen-year-old student found smoking a cigarette at work can be barred from participating in extracurricular activities (Denison, 2007). Though smoking should certainly be discouraged, lawmakers have determined that eighteen is a responsible enough age for each individual to make this choice; a school's code of conduct should not increase limits on individual freedom.
The case of tobacco use illustrates how school policy can overstep its appropriate boundaries. When a school penalizes an eighteen-year-old student — a legal adult — for an activity that is lawful under state and federal law, the institution is effectively substituting its own judgment for that of the legislature. Such overreach raises serious questions about the proper scope of school authority, particularly when the student's conduct occurs outside of school grounds and hours (Denison, 2007). While discouraging tobacco use among young people is a worthwhile goal, imposing consequences more severe than those recognized by law undermines the credibility of the institution enforcing them.
In addition to tobacco use, alcohol use and possession is one of the most common issues addressed in high school codes of conduct (Denison, 2007; Alamance-Burlington, 2009; American Athletic Institute, 2006). Again, alcohol use should be discouraged among high school students, but the zero-tolerance policy advocated by many codes of conduct is simply shortsighted and naĂŻve. Most high school students drink at some point, and often these codes of conduct are applied to students considered "at-risk" in greater numbers than to athletes, who are frequently able to slip by when parents and administrators look the other way. In addition, barring students caught with alcohol from school events is likely to be counterproductive, especially when these students see themselves being punished for something that many other people do. These codes go too far in punishing acts like alcohol and tobacco use without attempting in any meaningful way to foster open discussion about these topics.
"CHSAA model offers flexible, principle-based alternative"
You’re 61% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.