This paper examines the ethical and legal controversies surrounding Hillary Clinton's use of a personal email server during her tenure as U.S. Secretary of State. The paper explores how maintaining a private server raised concerns about government transparency, compliance with Freedom of Information Act requirements, and congressional oversight. It also addresses the legal dimension of the controversy, including the FBI's review of the server, questions about the handling of classified information, and the Fifth Amendment invocation by a key aide. The paper concludes by noting the potential impact of these issues on Clinton's public perception and her 2016 presidential candidacy.
This paper examines the ethical charges against a politician in recent memory. A particularly prominent example is the ethical and legal controversy surrounding Hillary Clinton's use of a personal email server during her tenure as U.S. Secretary of State. Ms. Clinton had a personal email server prepared and maintained, and she used that server to conduct official business in her role as Secretary of State. While it was not entirely clear at the time of writing whether Clinton would face charges or had broken the law, she had certainly attracted significant scrutiny from the top intelligence and law enforcement agencies in the United States.
Even if nothing Clinton did was illegal, one of her primary ethical failings centered on transparency in her role as a public official. One of the common obligations of holding public office is that correspondence conducted via email and other electronic means is often subject to public review through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and similar mechanisms. When it comes to positions that involve handling confidential material — such as Secretary of State — not all correspondence is subject to such review. However, oversight and review by authorized parties, such as committees of the U.S. House and Senate, still apply. The central concern is that maintaining a personal server is seen as a means of obscuring information from the public and from regulatory committees tasked with monitoring the executive branch of the U.S. government (Wilstein, 2015; Hemingway, 2015).
Clinton further complicated her situation — both ethically and potentially criminally — by the manner in which emails were being produced. A large number of emails were being released in a piecemeal fashion, and it appeared that many had been deleted. Moreover, the time periods during which emails were reportedly deleted seemed to coincide with some of the most controversial events of her tenure as Secretary of State, including the 2012 Benghazi attack. Public officials are held to a high standard of transparency, and Clinton was far from the first official to face such accusations. Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin faced much the same allegations and ethical charges during her time in office (Wilstein, 2015; Hemingway, 2015).
"Email deletions coinciding with sensitive events"
"FBI review, classified information, and Fifth Amendment"
Wilstein, M. (2015). Sarah Palin compares her own email problems to Hillary Clinton's. Mediaite.com. Retrieved 9 September 2015, from http://www.mediaite.com/online/sarah-palin-compares-her-own-email-problems-to-hillary-clintons/
You’re 62% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.