Were the Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombings Justified?
This essay argues that the United States' atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945 were justifiable on two primary grounds: ending a prolonged and devastating war and establishing American supremacy during the early Cold War era. The paper draws on multiple historical perspectives to support the claim that the bombs saved lives by prompting Japan's swift surrender, while also acknowledging serious counterarguments regarding civilian casualties, ethical violations, and evidence that Japan may have been close to surrender independently. Ultimately, the essay contends that the military and geopolitical outcomes achieved by the bombings outweigh the moral objections raised against them.
- Introduction: Historical context and two-part thesis statement
- Ending the War: The Military Necessity Argument: Bombs saved lives by ending prolonged conflict
- Geopolitical Justification and the Rise of U.S. Superpower Status: Bombings countered Soviet power and secured U.S. dominance
- Counterarguments: Ethics and Alternative Solutions: Civilian targeting, ethical violations, and Japan's near-surrender
- Conclusion: Military and political outcomes justify the bombings
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The essay presents a clear, arguable thesis in the introduction and maintains it consistently throughout all body paragraphs.
- It balances its argument by dedicating a full paragraph to counterarguments before rebutting them, demonstrating awareness of opposing viewpoints.
- The conclusion effectively synthesizes both the military and geopolitical justifications without introducing new claims.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper models the concession-rebuttal technique: it acknowledges credible opposing evidence — including the possibility that Japan was already seeking peace — then pivots to reassert that the actual outcomes of the bombings validate the decision. This move strengthens the overall argument by showing the writer has engaged seriously with complexity rather than ignoring it.
Structure breakdown
The essay follows a classic five-paragraph argumentative structure. The introduction establishes historical context and a two-part thesis. The second and third paragraphs each develop one half of that thesis (military necessity and Cold War geopolitics, respectively). The fourth paragraph presents and rebuts counterarguments. The concluding paragraph restates the thesis using evidence-grounded language. Citations from four distinct secondary sources are distributed across the body paragraphs.
Introduction
In August 1945, President Truman authorized the detonation of an atomic bomb nicknamed "Little Boy" on Hiroshima, Japan. Just three days later, the United States dropped another atomic bomb, called "Fat Man," on Nagasaki. About a week after the Nagasaki explosion, Japan surrendered and the Second World War officially came to an end. The two atomic bombs resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians, and many who did not instantly perish suffered long-term ill effects from radiation exposure. However gruesome and catastrophic the event, the dropping of the two atomic bombs on Japan is justifiable because it definitively ended a brutal and ongoing war and it also helped to solidify the United States as a global superpower dedicated to defeating nefarious states, including the Soviet Union.
Ending the War: The Military Necessity Argument
One of the most cogent reasons why the bombs were justified is rooted in the fact that the war had been dragging on and could have resulted in far more deaths — civilian and military — had Japan not surrendered when it did. Estimates of up to a million lives may have been saved due to the willingness to use the bomb at that specific juncture (Dahi). Alternative scenarios to the American bombing of Japan "would have probably turned out even worse" (Murray 1). As Mason points out, "the death toll on both sides was high, and the countries' negative view of one another became almost unbridgeable" (Mason 1). A drastic measure such as a weapon of mass destruction was the impetus needed to cease the senseless fighting. Moreover, Japan had committed wartime atrocities throughout the Pacific, and its imperialistic intentions were threatening to destabilize the entire region. The bomb has been widely regarded as "necessary to end the war" (Dahi 1).
Geopolitical Justification and the Rise of U.S. Superpower Status
A critical justification of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was America's need to counter the growing power of the Soviet Union and to establish itself as a global superpower. Mason points out that the most strategic use of the bombs was "to keep the U.S.S.R. in check," as it had sought to bolster its anti-American allies around the world (1). The United States effectively demonstrated its military power through the bombings, proving both its efficacy as a superpower and the effectiveness of the technology itself (Dahi). Were it not for the dual bombings, the United States might not have achieved the unequivocal global superpower status it enjoyed throughout the twentieth century — status that enabled Europe and other parts of the free world to rebuild.
Conclusion
Weapons of mass destruction present clear ethical and logistical problems, but in the case of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the atomic bombs achieved core military and political objectives. Japan did surrender immediately after the second bomb was detonated. Although hundreds of thousands of civilian lives were lost, the bombs ended World War II and thereby potentially reduced the number of American and other casualties that would have resulted had the war continued longer than it already had. Finally, the detonation of the atomic bombs sent a clear message to the United States' main rival — the Soviet Union — and secured the supremacy of American values in the twentieth century.
Works Cited
Dahi, Naji. "Dropping the Bomb On Hiroshima and Nagasaki was Never Justified." Antimedia. Retrieved online: http://theantimedia.org/dropping-the-bomb-on-hiroshima-and-nagasaki-was-never-justified/
Mason, Emma. "Was the U.S. Justified in Dropping Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki During the Second World War?" History Extra. 6 Aug. 2015. Retrieved online: http://www.historyextra.com/feature/second-world-war/was-us-justified-dropping-atomic-bombs-hiroshima-and-nagasaki-during-second
Murray, Mike. "Hiroshima 60 Years Later." The Soapbox. Vol. 3, No. 1, Oct. 2005. Retrieved online:
Weber, Mark. "Was Hiroshima Necessary?" Institute for Historical Review. Retrieved online: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v16/v16n3p-4_Weber.html
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.