The Atomic Bomb: Effects on Japan and the World

Introduction: Japan's Historical and Cultural Paradox

Modern Japanese culture is fraught with paradox. A nation constructed on ancient Shinto and Buddhist ideologies, its people have been conditioned to infuse old-world practices and philosophies into all aspects of life, from dining, working, and recreation to aesthetics, religion, and art. But amid this highly conscious preservation of tradition are a stifling number of indications that Japan is a vastly different nation than it was only fifty years ago. Steeped in the implications, tastes, and peculiarities of Eastern life, Japan is also an example of Western integration at its most thorough.

The bulk of its history shows that Japan was an imperialist force of the highest order, acting on intentions of militaristic expansion well into the twentieth century with an undeniable focus on the imposition of demonstrably Japanese ideologies. Today, however, we recognize Japan as both an esteemed colleague in the global dominance of capitalism and, from a much more implicitly understood angle, an American outpost for the physical and theoretical disbursement of democracy. Naturally, such a great chasm between historical identities has rendered Japan deeply contradictory in some respects, with consumerism and ultra-modernity somehow peacefully coexisting alongside tradition and historical reverence. But its relative success, especially when compared to the countless examples of failed nation-building in recent and classic history, does not remove the gravity of its origins.

Japan's imperialist push, which began with a 1931 invasion of Manchuria and ended when the United States deployed two atomic warheads at Hiroshima and Nagasaki fourteen years later, would be its last gasp and the threshold to a period of unprecedented reconstruction. The socially revised Japan that stands as one of America's clearest and staunchest allies today, in the aftermath of World War II, underwent a transformation of massive spiritual, political, and economic proportions. For all intents and purposes, the atomic bombs dropped over Japan wiped a nation's history clean and began a new chapter.

The Psychological and Political Impact on Japan

Most immediately visible, even in the first days following the atomic strikes of August 1945, was a jarring dose of reality: the emperor was only human. Japanese Emperor Hirohito, whose name itself translates to a claim of heavenly bestowal upon the people, was publicly perceived as a divine figure. Indeed, the Japanese royal legacy was directly correlated to the popular understanding of the Shinto faith, which sanctified the ruling family. As such, the emperor was generally believed by his subjects to be more than a man. He was a symbol of Japan — its faith, its honor, and its soul (Cook 1993).

His radio address to the people on August 14, 1945, admitting defeat and asking all Japanese citizens to follow suit, was inescapably devastating to the psyche of an entire nation. Thousands of years of imperial rule effectively came to an end when Emperor Hirohito advised those loyal to him to accept the terms of the conquerors. Those terms demanded nothing short of complete submission to the United States. When the Japanese were forced to accept the radical circumstances of military occupation and realignment in a Western image, the emperor's authority was subverted to little more than an honorary title. In a famous photograph depicting Supreme Allied Commander Douglas MacArthur towering over his recently deposed counterpart, Hirohito, the Japanese people were confronted with an image that shattered all illusions (Cook 1993).

Among those illusions were the divinity of the emperor and, more troubling to the Japanese self-image, the unparalleled power of imperial Japan. The man in whom many had invested their unwavering faith — patriotic and religious alike — was impotent. Among the major changes provoked by the dropping of the atomic bombs, this shift would prove especially significant. The change in Japan's national identity would carry vast future implications for the region, altering the orientation of what had long been a military power and an imperial scourge of the Asian continent. With the dropping of the atomic bombs and the psychological and practical struggles of rebuilding, Japan had surrendered authority to the United States. This would create a new power dynamic in which American influence spread both to Japan and to its broader region (McClain 2001).

The effect on Japan's morale was certainly damaging, and the political climate there following the war was dark and difficult to interpret. The losses Japan suffered during World War II were devastating by any measure. Often characterized as having wiped out a generation, the fourteen-year war yielded 2.3 million military casualties and 800,000 civilian deaths. Beyond this monumental loss, Japan suffered what many viewed as the emasculating occupation of the United States, beginning with the sheer and unthinkable carnage produced by the atomic strikes (Cook 1993).

Occupation, Disarmament, and Cultural Transformation

In accordance with his surrender, Emperor Hirohito sought to avoid the war crimes trials that faced his military leaders by becoming the strongest and most visible proponent of Westernization. In doing so, he welcomed General Douglas MacArthur, a powerful symbol of American authority, to preside over Japan. The six years of American military occupation that followed the war introduced a number of new elements to the Japanese political identity.

First and foremost, the United States addressed the pressing concern of Japan's dejection over defeat by disarming it. A nation that had spent the entirety of its history emphasizing the warrior tradition was stripped of its capacity to wage war. Both as a safeguard against the potentially hostile outgrowth of resentment and as an unavoidable response to its aggression, the United States deemed Japan a nation prohibited from possessing a standing army. Though for economic and political reasons the United States would attempt in vain to shift on this position in the 1970s, the prohibition would become a distinctive detail of Japanese culture — the great warrior tradition was, for all practical purposes, dead. There was natural frustration among the Japanese people, who initially viewed MacArthur as a threat to the Japanese way of life. It cannot be denied that evidence supports this concern in many respects, perhaps the most notable of which was the strict censorship of Japanese media during the occupation, which prevented any sentiments contrary to American authority or reconstruction from reaching the general public.

In the aftermath of defeat and occupation, Japan's transformation under American oversight represented one of the most consequential episodes of nation-building in modern history, reshaping the country's constitution, governance, and civil society in ways that persist to the present day.

The Nuclear Age: Cold War Arms Race and Non-Proliferation

Japanese culture had been significantly altered both by its defeat at the hands of the United States and by the occupation that followed. But in reality, the changes in Japan were only the first chapter in the narrative of atomic power. The devastating detonations on Japanese soil opened a new frontier in the conduct of warfare. On August 6, 1945, the world entered a new age. The end of World War II, presaged by the nuclear attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, introduced the world to the nuclear era.

The next five decades, unfolding under the shadow of the Cold War, were underscored by the continuing threat of nuclear conflict. With major conflicts in Korea, Cuba, and Vietnam functioning as remote nation-building contests between the world's two major superpowers, the United States and the Soviet Union began a race for the accumulation of nuclear weapons that brought an alarming new reality to the world. The events in Japan foreshadowed the new and enormous dangers which humanity had become capable of imposing upon itself.

The presence of nuclear power in global affairs came to play a dominant subtextual role in the considerations of war and diplomacy. Even so, this condition existed without any international controls for more than twenty years — until 1968, when the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) was signed. This agreement "represents the world's single most important multilateral nuclear arms control agreement, with the largest membership, and it remains the most successful exemplar of arms control" (Rauf 1999).

Largely a response to a heightened Cold War, in which theaters in Southeast Asia, South America, and Central America revealed the genuinely global perils posed by the now-nuclear-armed American and Soviet spheres of influence, the non-proliferation agenda encompasses the prevention of continued weapons stockpiling, the exchange of nuclear secrets between nations, and the development of covert nuclear programs in non-nuclear states. The international initiative represents an effort to place a collective safeguard agreement into action that would prevent the worst-case escalation of hostilities between the two superpowers. After the revelations at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the internationalization of the power struggle bore with it "the threat of total annihilation" (Debat et al. 2006). A great many organizations and regulatory bodies emerged to prevent the realization of this threat. The attacks on Japan at the end of World War II raised the stakes of global conflict in a way that stimulated considerable preventative policy. The result today is a continued contest over who is entitled to nuclear capability and who is not. Many developing nations such as North Korea and Iran claim they are being denied the right to generate nuclear energy to improve domestic energy policy, but political differences with the world order have also raised concerns about the safety of nuclear power in such hands.

Conclusion: A Legacy That Endures

Ultimately, the foregoing discussion underscores the most prominent and problematic effect of the nuclear strikes. The attention paid in this account to the changes in Japan following the attacks is important for framing our understanding of the effects on a nation — its conditions, its institutions, and its psyche — of a full-scale nuclear attack. It illustrates that from a warfare standpoint, the deployment of an atomic bomb is a compelling deterrent against aggression or the sustaining of hostilities.

That said, the conditions imposed upon Japan by the attacks are all but erased today. The rebuilding of Japan has changed the nation's face entirely, with much of its modernity and cultural complexity speaking to the trauma in its not-too-distant past. Its recovery has been fraught with difficulties, but it has occurred. By contrast, no method has yet fully succeeded in preventing the spread of nuclear technology and the capacity to weaponize nuclear energy. This remains one of the most important issues in world diplomacy and international security.

As this discussion shows, the scale of the attacks on Japan has encouraged the creation of NGOs, world government agencies, and domestic action groups concerned with preventing nuclear proliferation. However, this has been an uphill effort ever since the strikes that brought the hostilities of World War II to their official end. As the mushroom clouds cleared over two distinct scenes of outright destruction, a new threat hung in the air, forever altering the nature of global conflict. Today, this remains a significant presence in the world community, with the images of Hiroshima and Nagasaki never far from the world's collective consciousness.

Works Cited

Biswas, S. (2001). "Nuclear Apartheid" as Political Position: Race as a Postcolonial Resource? Alternatives: Global, Local, Political.

Cook, T.F. (1993). Japan at War: An Oral History. New Press.

Debat, A. & Gvosdev, N.K. (2006). America the Vulnerable. The National Interest.

Dower, J.W. (1974). Ground Zero 1945. MIT: Visualizing Cultures.

Eden, L. (2005). Underestimating the Consequences of Use of Nuclear Weapons: Condemned to Repeat the Past's Errors. Forum on Physics and Society: Stanford Institute for International Studies.

Krieger, D. (2005). Nuclear Arms Control Treaties. Nuclear Files.

Kritsky, W.G. & Loiselle, V. (1999). Nuclear Power for the 21st Century: There Is Life for the Nuclear Industry in the New Millennium If It Is Willing to Create Its Own Future. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, 14.

Lipper, I. & Stone, J. (2000). Nuclear Energy and Society. University of Michigan.

McClain, J.L. (2001). Japan: A Modern History. W.W. Norton Publishing Company.

Rauf, T. (1999). Successes of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime. Center for Non-Proliferation Studies.