This paper examines how Adolf Hitler's rise to power during the 1920s and 1930s resulted from a convergence of historical circumstances and calculated personal image-making. Drawing on contemporary accounts, primary sources, and recent historical scholarship, the paper argues that Hitler's success depended less on innate ability and more on his exploitation of the German public's fear, ignorance, and susceptibility to "great man" theories of leadership. The devastating consequences of World War I, the punitive Treaty of Versailles, and the collapse of Weimar Germany's political structures created an environment primed for a messianic, emotionally manipulative figure. Hitler crafted a public persona that simultaneously conveyed humility and singular competence, disguising ideological fanaticism in the language of science and reason.
Adolf Hitler's rise to power over the course of the 1920s and 1930s was due to a confluence of political and personal factors that made him the ideal figure to seize control of Germany's failing fortunes. In many ways, his frightening success can be viewed as a case of being the right person, in the right place, at the right time, because his peculiar personality was an almost perfect match for the disillusioned Germans suffering from the ignominy and economic disaster that followed their defeat in the First World War. Numerous researchers have attempted to diagnose Hitler's personality in psychological or psychiatric terms, and while these studies offer some useful insights, this paper focuses more on Hitler's personality as it relates to his audience. Regardless of the specific neuroses Hitler exhibited, the image he cultivated in the minds of Germans — and of some in the international community — depended on a perceived logic, humility, and charm, even as his actions and speeches, from the perspective of the historian, appear illogical, fanatical, and megalomaniacal.
Combining recent historical work with contemporary accounts of Hitler given by those who engaged with him during his rise helps to demonstrate how Hitler exploited a fairly inaccurate understanding of personality, psychology, and their relationship to power in order to couch his bigoted ideology in the language of science, reason, and national pride. In doing so, he ensnared a population already primed to receive this ideology due to their fear and ignorance regarding the actual causes of Germany's misery.
Before addressing Hitler's successful manipulation of widespread assumptions regarding personality and its relation to power, it is helpful to provide some background on the state of Germany following World War I and the initial emergence of the National Socialist party. As is now widely understood, Hitler's rise would likely have been impossible without the devastating ramifications the war had on the German economy and national identity, and the unexpected consequences of the Treaty of Versailles. Following the war and the punitive reparation measures included in the treaty, "the economy was in seeming freefall, and social divisiveness was so great that many Germans thought a Soviet-style revolution was likely," and indeed, there was a brief uprising in Munich which partially served to justify the paramilitary groups that would provide the backbone for Hitler's National Socialist party (Redles 24).
Old political organizations were rapidly deteriorating while "the new parliamentary democracy, so long sought after by many liberals, was rejected by just as many other Germans as being more a cause of political chaos rather than its solution," leaving Germany, including the leadership of the Weimar government, in an almost infantile state of helplessness (Redles 24). The only forms of social organization that were seemingly not dissolving before the public's eyes were nationalist paramilitary groups and other ideological organizations that sought to reject the perceived failures of both imperial and parliamentary government. Far from proposing new, productive ideas regarding the future of the country, these ideologies were marked by an infantile reliance on comfortable assumptions and preexisting stereotypes.
These paramilitary organizations arose almost immediately following the end of World War I, as the Treaty of Versailles "mandated reduction of Germany's armed forces and prohibition of military weapons at target ranges," thus excluding numerous returning veterans from the social and political organization that had previously structured their lives (Imhoof 464). The result was the emergence of what were essentially highly nationalist, politically minded gangs. The Versailles treaty did not actually prevent Germany from training militants; rather, it forced the training of these militants and their organizations outside of official channels, which ultimately made them more susceptible to assimilation by the emerging National Socialist party.
In particular, the sharpshooting clubs that rose to prominence following World War I — being the only legal means by which men could train — provided an ideal local community organization from which the National Socialist party could build support. The emergence of sharpshooting as a popular pastime and the newfound importance granted to sharpshooting clubs in the 1920s "provided the institutional and ideological basis for its integration into the Third Reich" (Imhoof 463). Thus, far from precluding the dangerous buildup of military power in Germany, the restrictions included in the Treaty of Versailles only served to create the conditions for a different form of military power — one that could be co-opted far more easily than a standard military.
At the same time, the state of the German economy was rapidly deteriorating with no sign of reversal. Coupled with the fundamentally new methods of warfare introduced during World War I and the previously unheard-of scale of the conflict, the economic and social divisions within Germany presented such seemingly insurmountable problems that "many Germans interpreted Weimar Germany as a culture of apocalypse" (Redles 25). As in any time of marked globalization and rapid political and social upheaval, the population of Germany was being forced to confront problems born out of a global system it had no way of wholly conceiving, given that the shared public consciousness is almost always behind in understanding the actual structures of power — new theoretical knowledge and critical tools take time to disseminate and ingratiate themselves into public awareness. When faced with such overwhelming, bewildering developments, people tend to retreat toward the oversimplified answers provided by religiosity and other forms of restrictive thinking, such as bigotry and nationalism. This phenomenon helps to explain the formation and rise of the National Socialist party at the beginning of the 1920s as well as the appeal of a domineering personality such as Hitler's.
"Hitler's crafted image of humility and messianic appeal"
"How emotional appeal masqueraded as rational argument"
"Historicism and misdirection as tools of power"
Like many politicians, Hitler's success actually had less to do with any innate ability on his part and much more to do with the particular historical context in which he found himself. This is not, however, to entirely discount the centrality of Hitler's personality in his rise to power, because he effectively used his public persona to manipulate the assumptions and fears of the German populace during the 1920s and 1930s. The consequences of the Treaty of Versailles ensured not only that Germany would suffer catastrophic economic and political failures, but also that its military capacity, far from being dismantled, would organize itself outside official channels of control, thus making Hitler's rise all the easier.
You’re 41% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.