This paper examines Harlan L. Dalton's critique of the Horatio Alger myth — the quintessential American rags-to-riches narrative — as presented in his essay "Horatio Alger." Dalton argues that the myth is particularly harmful and misleading for Black Americans, as it obscures systemic racial inequality while encouraging individuals to attribute poverty to personal failing. The paper engages with Dalton's thesis, concedes its merits, but extends the critique beyond race: the author contends that the myth ultimately fails for all people, regardless of background, because genuine upward mobility from poverty to extreme wealth typically requires the abandonment of the very moral values — honesty, altruism, and integrity — that the original Alger stories celebrated.
The Horatio Alger myth is the "rags to riches" story that America likes to use to represent itself. Hard work and perseverance, the narrative insists, can pull the poor out of poverty and make them rich. The problem is that this myth is only partially true. Analysis of the myth shows that the accompanying conditions in Alger's original stories required integrity and honesty — and that it is only the privileged few who can accumulate wealth within such a framework.
Horatio Alger Jr. was a prolific author during the Teddy Roosevelt era whose novels featured characters who inevitably achieved wealth — and did so, a detail many forget, by leading exemplary moral lives. America became enthusiastic about this story. It came to epitomize the reputation the country wished to project: that rags-to-riches journeys are possible through hard work and perseverance, and that this journey is available to anyone regardless of background. Yet the stories may do more harm than good. Many people work hard their entire lives, persist through hardship, and still fail. Their failure then becomes grounds for others to deny them assistance, on the assumption that they simply have not worked hard enough.
Harlon L. Dalton, Professor of Law, challenges the Horatio Alger romance, arguing that it is misleading and that it particularly deceives Black Americans. To Dalton, the Alger myth speaks to everyone except the individual of minority — specifically Black — extraction. The myth, he argues, contains three messages: each of us is judged on his or her individual merits; we each have a fair opportunity to develop those merits; and our merits will eventually earn us wealth and lift us out of misfortune.
The Horatio Alger myth is therefore typical of quintessential pop psychology in that it maintains that success in life has nothing to do with external factors such as pedigree, race, class background, gender, national origin, or sexual orientation. Will it, and you will get it. Perseverance and labor, in this telling, dictate the outcome.
For Dalton, the myth holds a certain appeal: it pulls people forward and gives them a reason to get up in the morning even when despair is overwhelming. It offers a kind of optimism, even if that optimism is not grounded in reality. At the same time, the myth allows people to turn a blind eye to racial injustice, because it provides a ready rationalization — that the difficulties faced by Black Americans are simply the result of insufficient tenacity, grit, perseverance, or discipline. In this way, the myth not only serves to maintain the hierarchical social order but actively works to intensify it, promoting and entrenching inequality.
For Black Americans, the myth creates a painful dissonance. They experience firsthand the difficulties — and near impossibilities — of rising out of their circumstances despite genuine hard work. On the other hand, the myth provides a reason to keep striving, and so they suppress the dissonance and reluctantly accept the myth's falsity. For white Americans, by contrast, the myth is self-serving: it allows them to excuse the ugliness of racism and attribute Black poverty to a lack of individual effort rather than to systemic disadvantage.
Dalton's thesis has merit in an era when possibilities for Black Americans were severely diminished. However, history offers examples of Black individuals who climbed out of extreme poverty to achieve great wealth. Oprah Winfrey is perhaps the most prominent example — born into rural poverty, she became one of the wealthiest people in the world. Maya Angelou and Sidney Poitier are others, and the list could continue at length.
"Counter-examples complicate the racial argument"
"Wealth accumulation requires abandoning Alger's own values"
In response to Dalton's analysis, the rags-to-riches story can be true for anyone regardless of racial background and other impediments. But the Horatio Alger myth fails for other reasons: it cannot be true for anyone simply because the journey from poverty to astounding wealth depends on a breach of the very values the myth celebrates. The story ascribes success to virtue; reality reveals that extreme success more often requires its abandonment. Life contradicts the story, and reality disproves it. The myth, ultimately, fails — not only for Black Americans, as Dalton argues, but for everyone.
You’re 70% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.