The Impact of Downsizing on Workers, Communities, and Markets
This paper reviews empirical research on the wide-ranging consequences of organizational downsizing. It examines how layoffs and restructuring affect employees across industries — including healthcare workers and manufacturing employees — producing psychological distress, reduced job satisfaction, increased absenteeism, and deteriorating physical health. The paper also explores the broader community and economic consequences of plant closings, the impact on downsizing survivors, and the role of unions, labor relations, and external employment security in mitigating negative outcomes. Taken together, the studies reviewed demonstrate that downsizing carries significant costs that extend well beyond the immediate workforce reduction.
- Introduction: The Scope of Downsizing: Overview of downsizing's widespread workforce and social effects
- Restructuring and Its Effects on Healthcare Workers: Nurse study links restructuring to job insecurity and dissatisfaction
- Physical Health Consequences of Downsizing: Downsizing linked to higher sickness absence and health decline
- Community and Economic Consequences of Layoffs: Plant closings damage local tax bases and community services
- Market Orientation and Organizational Trust: Downsizing erodes trust and weakens firm market orientation
- The Impact on Downsizing Survivors: Surviving employees report lasting psychological and morale damage
- Conclusion: Calls for further research on long-term downsizing effects
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper synthesizes a diverse body of empirical research, moving logically from individual psychological effects to community-level and market-level consequences, giving the argument both depth and breadth.
- Specific statistics — such as the 2.17-times higher sickness absence rate after major downsizing — ground abstract claims in concrete evidence, strengthening credibility.
- The paper acknowledges complexity by noting that some negative effects can be mitigated through managerial support, information sharing, and union presence, avoiding an oversimplified argument.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective literature synthesis: rather than summarizing each study in isolation, it groups findings thematically and uses transitional phrasing ("Similarly," "These results were similar to prior studies") to show how multiple sources converge on the same conclusions. This technique builds cumulative evidentiary weight without requiring original data collection.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing introduction establishing that downsizing has two sides. It then moves through a series of thematically organized sections: psychological effects on nurses, physical health outcomes, community economic damage, effects on market orientation and trust, and finally the impact on layoff survivors. A brief forward-looking conclusion closes the argument. Each section transitions naturally into the next, maintaining a clear throughline about the multidimensional costs of downsizing.
Introduction: The Scope of Downsizing
What is the impact of downsizing? As the studies reviewed below indicate, layoffs have a number of negative effects not only on workers in different industries, but also on their communities and the market as a whole. Although it has been argued that downsizing can be economically beneficial to companies, the evidence presented here shows that there are two sides to this issue.
Over the past decade, the workplace has altered considerably in terms of job stability. People have either experienced layoffs firsthand or directly known someone else who was impacted by re-engineering, downsizing, outsourcing, or acquisition. For employees adversely affected by these changes — or for those who do not fully understand why these changes are occurring — the effects can be very disturbing and can impact both their personal and professional lives.
References
Burke, R. J., & Nelson, D. L. (1997). Downsizing and restructuring: Lessons from the firing line for revitalizing organizations. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 18, 325–334.
Campbell-Jamieson, F., Worrall, L., & Cooper, C. L. (2001). Downsizing in Britain and its effects on survivors and their organizations. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 14, 35–58.
Center for Competitive Economics. [University]. (July 2004). Estimating the economic impacts of plant closings and business downsizing in Cleveland County, NC. Cleveland Chamber of Commerce.
Dekker, S. W., & Schaufeli, W. B. (1995). The effects of job insecurity on psychological health and withdrawal: A longitudinal study. Australian Psychologist, 30, 57–63.
Farrell, M. A. (2000). The effect of downsizing on market orientation: The role of trust and commitment. ANZMAC 2000 Marketing Academy Conference.
Ferrie, J., Shipley, M., Marmot, M., Stansfeld, S., & Smith, G. (1998). The health effects of major organizational change and job insecurity. Social Science and Medicine, 46, 243–254.
Greenglass, L., Burke, R. J., & Fiksenbaum, L. (2002). Impact of restructuring, job insecurity and job satisfaction in hospital nurses. Stress News, 14(1).
Kinnunen, U., Mauno, S., Natti, J., & Happonen, M. (2000). Organizational antecedents and outcomes of job insecurity: A longitudinal study in three organizations in Finland. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 443–459.
Kivimäki, M., Vahtera, J., Pentti, J., & Ferrie, J. (2000). Factors underlying the effect of organisational downsizing on health of employees: Longitudinal cohort study. British Medical Journal, 320, 971–975.
Masi, A. C. (2000). Downsizing and employment insecurity under different adjustment regimes: A Canadian-Swedish comparison. Journal for Labour Issues, 16(2), 191–212.
Mishra, Ariel N., & Mishra, Karen E. (1994). The role of mutual trust in effective downsizing strategies. Human Resource Management, 33, 261–279.
Moore, S., Grunberg, L., & Greenberg, E. S. (2003). Repeated downsizing contact: The effects of similar and dissimilar layoff experiences on work and well-being outcomes. Institute of Behavioral Science, Research Program on Political and Economic Change. [University]. Working Paper.
Narver, John, & Tietje, Brian. (1998). Creating a market orientation. Journal of Market Focused Management, 2(3), 241–255.
O'Neill, H. M., & Lenn, D. J. (1995). Voices of survivors: Words that downsizing CEOs should hear. Academy of Management Executive, 9, 23–34.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.