This paper examines interactivity as an educational method that supports active learning across online and traditional classroom environments. Drawing on peer-reviewed literature, it argues that interactive approaches—ranging from peer feedback in distance learning to computer-assisted instruction and e-textbooks in campus settings—improve student engagement, knowledge acquisition, and academic performance. The paper reviews barriers to interactivity such as scheduling constraints, limited resources, and teacher training gaps, and evaluates the strategies educators have developed to overcome them. Evidence consistently shows that when students interact meaningfully with content, peers, and instructors, learning outcomes improve across disciplines, age levels, and institutional contexts.
Interactivity in the classroom refers to a hands-on approach to education that facilitates active learning (Park, 2015). Active learning has been shown to strengthen students' ability to acquire knowledge over time—more so than passive learning (Dobbs, 2011). Through interaction, which may occur with or without technology, students obtain a deeper understanding of lessons, retain information more effectively, and are better able to build on prior knowledge. Interactivity has been shown to be a productive method for teachers seeking to support student learning with applications that get students involved and engaged with the material in a meaningful way.
This paper argues that interactivity for education is a beneficial method that educators can utilize to increase student performance, knowledge acquisition, and academic success throughout a range of teaching environments, age levels, and disciplines.
Interactivity for education can be a benefit at any level, from primary education to higher education and across multiple disciplines (Guzman, Costa-Castello, Dormido, & Berenguel, 2016). It has applicability in both traditional classroom learning and online learning. It is especially helpful for students because it encourages engagement, fosters direct interaction with course material, and cultivates a personal commitment to digesting the information presented. When interactivity is required of a student, there is a demand on the student's part to respond in a personal way to what is presented.
Interactivity promotes student participation, especially in online learning where it can be difficult for teachers to assess student engagement (Park, 2015). However, as Park (2015) shows, there is a need for teachers and moderators to assist student learning in interactive terms in order to promote the acquisition of knowledge in online formats. In other words, the online format itself is not enough for students to be engaged: they require some direction, coordinated exposure to content, and a method of engaging with content that facilitates interactivity with their peers. Providing feedback in the form of peer responses and reviews is one recommended method that Park (2015) advocates implementing.
The benefits of interactivity in online learning have also been measured through student performance assessments (Kent et al., 2016). Positive correlation has been identified between "various interactivity measures, taken from various learning communities, and a set of well-known learning assessments" (Kent et al., 2016, p. 116). Wei, Peng, and Chou (2015) similarly provide evidence that interactivity in online learning promotes student acquisition of knowledge as measured by scores in online discussions, exams, and group projects. Additionally, students themselves have indicated that they benefit from interactivity: "students' self-reported use of interactive functions, students' perceptions of the usefulness of interactive functions, and students' actual-use logs" all indicate that their online learning performance is positively impacted by interactivity (Wei et al., 2015, p. 10).
Other means of measuring performance include actual-use logs, which refer to the number of times students log in to an online course, the number of times they examine or read their online learning materials, the number of times they post in discussion threads in online portals, and the number of times they review their syllabus (Wei et al., 2015). Each of these interactive methods assists online and distance learning students in engaging more deeply with the material through active learning.
Interactivity in online learning is a helpful method of instruction, as it serves to bring students together in ways they would otherwise not be able to achieve. Although physical separation limits the depth of interaction, interactivity remains highly effective in enabling communication that stimulates student engagement.
Huss, Sela, and Eastep (2015) explore some of the barriers to interactivity in the online learning community. They show that teachers have demonstrated a "need to establish quality interactions throughout their distance courses" but have also "acknowledged barriers they perceive in attaining desired levels of human relationship" (p. 4). The barriers to attaining desired levels of human interaction are primarily related to time and space. The nature of the online learning medium means there is little an educator can do to overcome these obstacles entirely within the distance learning framework. In spite of these constraints, interactivity can still be achieved—if in a limited degree—particularly because student interaction with teachers and other students is restricted in terms of actual one-to-one time, face-to-face meetings, and scheduling.
Despite these barriers, the recognized need for interactivity has prompted the development of successful strategies. Huss et al. (2015) note that the keys to developing an interactivity strategy in online learning consist of "collaboration, caring, and context when creating and teaching courses in an online environment" (p. 4). Collaboration facilitates interactivity by bringing people together to share ideas and communicate their experiences. Caring provides the impetus for interaction. And context provides the framework that guides how students can interact.
The findings of Huss et al. (2015) are corroborated by Kent, Laslo, and Rafaeli (2016), who demonstrate in their assessment of interactivity in online learning that the network is a major component of successful interactive engagement: "it is the network of interactions among content items and participants which drives a collective knowledge construction process" (p. 116). In other words, the network of exchange itself is what helps facilitate the interactive process and fosters engagement and relationship building among students. By linking content to relational interactivity, feedback distribution, and collective knowledge construction, educators can use the online platform to overcome the inherent barriers of the medium. For example, online discussions in which students and teachers engage with learning content, communicate via chat rooms or video, and share information through portals, direct messaging, and student-driven response papers are positive ways to facilitate interactivity (Kent et al., 2016).
"Interactive methods in campus and vocational settings"
"E-textbooks, computers, and measurable learning gains"
Interactivity is beneficial in both online learning spheres and in traditional classroom environments. Although barriers to interactivity can exist in both formats, these obstacles can be overcome with technological assistance, teacher training, and student willingness to engage. The barriers, moreover, are minor in comparison to the opportunities for interactivity that exist in both learning situations.
You’re 50% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.