Ischaemic Stroke Nursing Care: Case Study of an Aboriginal Patient
This paper presents a nursing case study of Mary Young, a 71-year-old Aboriginal Australian woman admitted with a moderate-to-severe thrombotic ischaemic stroke complicated by atrial fibrillation, Type 2 diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, atherosclerosis, and osteoporosis. The paper identifies her primary admission diagnosis and outlines key nursing problems — including impaired mobility, post-stroke fatigue, impaired verbal communication, risk of powerlessness, and social isolation — drawing on NANDA diagnostic frameworks. Evidence-based nursing management strategies are discussed for fatigue and aphasia, including physiotherapy, speech pathology referral, and communication aids. Discharge planning considerations address supported discharge options, education about modifiable risk factors, and the patient's social circumstances and cultural background.
- Introduction and Primary Admission Diagnosis: Stroke confirmed; key comorbidities and risk factors identified
- Nursing Problems: NANDA diagnoses: mobility, fatigue, communication, isolation
- Nursing Management: Fatigue: Evidence-based interventions for post-stroke fatigue
- Nursing Management: Communication: Aphasia management and speech pathology referral
- Discharge Planning: Supported discharge criteria and risk factor education
- Conclusion: Outstanding risks and readiness for discharge assessed
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper integrates a patient's multiple comorbidities — atrial fibrillation, Type 2 diabetes, hypertension — into a coherent explanation of stroke risk, showing how background conditions shape both diagnosis and care planning.
- Cultural context is woven throughout: the patient's Aboriginal heritage and rare indigenous languages are treated as clinically relevant factors affecting communication assessment and social isolation risk, not just demographic details.
- The discussion honestly acknowledges gaps in the evidence base (e.g., limited research on post-stroke fatigue compared with chemotherapy-related fatigue), which demonstrates critical engagement with the literature rather than uncritical acceptance.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses NANDA-aligned nursing diagnosis language to frame clinical observations as structured, actionable problems. Each nursing problem is connected directly to an evidence-based management strategy and then carried forward into discharge planning, creating a logical chain from assessment through to safe discharge — a hallmark of effective clinical reasoning in nursing writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a standard clinical case-study structure: brief patient profile and primary diagnosis, followed by nursing problem identification, two focused nursing management sections (fatigue and communication), discharge planning, and a conclusion. This mirrors the nursing process (assess → diagnose → plan → intervene → evaluate) and makes the argument easy to follow for clinical readers. The conclusion synthesises outstanding risks rather than simply restating the paper's contents.
Introduction and Primary Admission Diagnosis
Mary Young is a 71-year-old Aboriginal Australian woman who has presented with a number of different health issues, including osteoporosis, hypercholesterolaemia, atherosclerosis, atrial fibrillation, and Type 2 diabetes. She has been feeling fatigued for several months, and her current admission was prompted by increasing dizziness, blurred vision, and a persistent headache. She was found to have suffered a moderate-to-severe ischaemic stroke. This paper outlines the primary admission diagnosis, the nursing problems identified, nursing management strategies, and discharge planning for Mary.
Mary was admitted to the emergency department with left-sided hemiparesis, aphasia, and hypertension. She had an irregular pulse rate. An ECG revealed atrial fibrillation. A thrombotic ischaemic stroke was suspected and confirmed on CT. She has since been stabilised and admitted to the medical ward for clinical management and rehabilitation.
Thrombotic ischaemic strokes are caused by a number of factors. Among these, Mary has Type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation — risk factors that not only may have contributed to this stroke but may precipitate future strokes if left unaddressed. Hinkle and Guanci (2007) note that this type of stroke involves restriction of blood flow to the brain. Several potential outcomes can affect care after the patient has been stabilised. The patient's airway may be compromised, and a swallow screen should be applied before anything is administered by mouth, including water and medications (Hinkle & Guanci, 2007). The patient's ability to communicate can also be affected by the stroke and should be closely monitored. Mary worked for the South Australian Police Department and would normally be expected to communicate in English; however, she does not appear able to do so at this time, and this is a matter that must be addressed prior to discharge (Hinkle & Guanci, 2007).
Nursing Problems
Several nursing diagnoses can be made for Mary at this stage. She has impaired physical mobility and impaired walking, as she is unable to bear her own weight. She is experiencing fatigue, which predated her stroke. She has impaired verbal communication. She is at risk of powerlessness due to her deteriorating physical condition: Mary wishes to continue her work and contributions to her community, and may struggle emotionally and mentally with being unable to do so during her recovery.
Mary is also at risk of social isolation. This risk is heightened by her compromised mobility and by her current inability to communicate in English. The Aboriginal languages she speaks have very few — if any — fluent speakers in her immediate environment, and there has been no assessment of how well she is able to use those languages in her present state. There is a real risk that she will become socially isolated if she can neither move freely nor communicate verbally with those around her.
Nursing Management: Fatigue
The first nursing problem to examine is Mary's fatigue. She was experiencing fatigue prior to her stroke, and post-stroke fatigue is expected to persist. One of the difficulties with managing post-stroke fatigue is the limited evidence available to guide practice. There is a substantial body of work on chemotherapy-related fatigue, but comparatively little on stroke-related fatigue. Collo, Feigin, and Dudley (2007) note that fatigue is common in stroke survivors and is linked to reduced independence — both of which are significant nursing concerns. Some existing research is inconclusive (Michael, Allen, & Macko, 2006), but fatigue has been shown to be associated with impaired balance and increased fall risk — a particularly serious concern for older individuals such as Mary. Strokes have been linked to falls, especially in the presence of fatigue (Schmid et al., 2010).
Given the limited evidence base, only generalised interventions can be recommended at this stage. First, Mary and her daughter both need to be made aware of the risks associated with fatigue, including the risk of falling, so that the home environment can be modified to minimise that risk. Dietary factors also warrant consideration. Additionally, physiotherapy and rehabilitation should be initiated so that Mary can regain as much mobility as possible, since improved mobility is associated with reduced fatigue. At her age, however, it may ultimately come down to identifying appropriate coping strategies — such as increased assistance from her daughter, arranging home care services, or other measures to minimise the negative impact of fatigue on her daily life.
Conclusion
Mary faces a number of significant challenges, relating both to her stroke and to the underlying conditions that contributed to it. She has communication difficulties, as well as problems with balance and fatigue. She appears to be a long way from being ready for discharge, as she is currently unable to care for herself independently. The anxiety she is experiencing is understandable given the severity of her stroke and the stressful circumstances she now faces. Her multiple health issues have converged in a serious way.
Mary requires assessment by a speech pathologist to determine the nature and extent of her aphasia. She will need a structured treatment plan for her diabetes and hypertension. She is at risk of social isolation and of being unable to care for herself independently after discharge. Caution must be exercised in planning her discharge: she may not be able to understand or retain instructions at this point. Her daughter appears to be a reliable support person, but this should be formally evaluated, as Mary does not appear to have anyone else to rely on. If home care support can be arranged to assist Mary with basic daily functions following discharge, this will be essential — as she currently cannot manage basic self-care and is therefore not yet a suitable candidate for discharge.
References
Collo, S., Feigin, S., & Dudley, M. (2007). Post-stroke fatigue — where is the evidence to guide practice? New Zealand Medical Journal, 120(1264), 1–9.
Gordon, C., Hill, C., & Ashburn, A. (2008). The use of conversational analysis: Nurse-patient interaction in communication disability after stroke. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(3), 544–553.
Hinkle, J., & Guanci, M. (2007). Acute ischemic stroke review. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 39(5), 285–293.
ISC. (2016). Ischaemic stroke. Internet Stroke Center. Retrieved April 19, 2016 from
Michael, K., Allen, J., & Macko, R. (2006). Fatigue after stroke: Relationship to mobility, fitness, ambulatory activity, social support and falls efficacy. Rehabilitation Nursing. Retrieved April 19, 2016 from http://www.rehabnurse.org/apps/ws_resource/public_index.php?task=full_article&art_id=41&cat_id=10
NANDA. (2014). The complete list of NANDA nursing diagnoses for 2012–2014. NANDA. Retrieved April 19, 2016 from http://www.kc-courses.com/fundamentals/week2process/nanda2012.pdf
Saka, O., Serra, V., Samyshkin, Y., McGuire, A., & Wolfe, C. (2009). Cost-effectiveness of stroke unit care followed by early supported discharge. Stroke, 40, 24–29.
Schmid, A., et al. (2010). Prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of poststroke falls in acute hospital setting. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 47(6), 553–562.
Stroke Association. (2016). Aphasia. The Stroke Association. Retrieved April 19, 2016 from
Stroke Foundation. (2016). Communication after stroke. Stroke Foundation of Australia. Retrieved April 19, 2016 from
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.