This paper offers a literary analysis of Sophocles' Oedipus Rex, arguing that knowledge functions as the play's central theme. The essay traces how Oedipus's relentless pursuit of truth β beginning with his investigation into the plague on Thebes β ultimately destroys the life he has built. Drawing on key exchanges with Teiresias, the analysis demonstrates how Sophocles employs dramatic irony to generate tension and sympathy in the audience. The paper concludes by connecting this structure to Aristotle's concept of catharsis: the audience's pity and fear are purged alongside Oedipus as the full horror of his identity is revealed.
The main theme of Sophocles' Oedipus Rex is knowledge. Oedipus begins the play wanting to know why Thebes is suffering a plague. He turns to Creon, who has been sent to the oracle to find the meaning of the plague. Creon reports that the Thebans must "drive away the polluting stain this land has harboured" (113β14). The polluting stain refers to the murder of King Laius and the fact that the murderer still lives, unpunished, in Thebes. Oedipus vows to remove the offending pollution. Sophocles uses irony to bring the tragedy into focus. Oedipus declares, "This polluting stain I will remove, not for some distant friend, but for myself. For whoever killed this man may soon enough desire to turn his hand in the same way against me, too, and kill me" (165β69). The irony is that he is the murderer, and by acting as the prosecutor of justice he inadvertently destroys the life he has come to possess as ruler: in the end, his wife will hang herself out of horror for what the facts have uncovered; he will blind himself and stagger out of Thebes a broken man. Yet in the great fall that he experiences, Oedipus comes to know himself. The audience experiences a cathartic effect β the purging of the emotions.
Oedipus is warned not to pursue the case by the prophet Teiresias, whose advice the impulsive Oedipus ignores. The prophet tells him that he will not like the answer he seeks β but Oedipus is driven by pride; after all, he solved the riddle of the Sphinx, and he is not afraid of a challenge. He fails, however, to understand the full measure of the warning given him. When Oedipus pushes the prophet to reveal what he knows, Teiresias states, "You are all ignorant. I will not reveal the troubling things inside me" (391β92). Teiresias knows that Oedipus is the murderer and that, to make matters worse, he has married his mother and had children by her. Oedipus erupts violently and calls the prophet the "most disgraceful of disgraceful men" (399).
Sophocles again uses dramatic irony here, for the prophet is actually trying to be merciful by withholding knowledge from Oedipus. Teiresias urges Oedipus to bear the burden of the plague to his death rather than seek out the murderer of Laius. Oedipus will not hear it, and his temper gets the better of him. Indeed, it is this very temper that led him to kill β unknowingly β his father Laius earlier in his life. Thus, it is not Teiresias who is the most disgraceful of disgraceful men, but rather Oedipus himself; he simply does not know it yet. Only Teiresias knows the truth.
"Audience sympathy and creeping dread build tension"
"Final revelation triggers catharsis and universal pity"
You’re 66% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.