This essay examines Sophocles' Oedipus the King through the lens of Jungian archetypes, arguing that Oedipus does not occupy a single archetypal role but successively embodies three: the scapegoat, the questing hero, and the outcast. The paper traces how Oedipus' life mirrors the Sphinx's famous riddle about man's three stages of existence, connecting each stage to a distinct archetypal identity. It also analyzes the role of hubris—both his father's and his own—as a tragic flaw that compounds the effects of fate. Ultimately, the essay argues that Oedipus resonates so powerfully in the collective unconscious because he is simultaneously victim and agent of his own downfall.
"What walks on four legs in the morning, two legs at noon, and on three legs in the evening?" In answering the Sphinx's riddle with the word "man," the Oedipus of Sophocles' Oedipus the King seals his fate. He will marry the widowed queen of Thebes, having unwittingly dispensed with his father during a roadside brawl. Perhaps because the answer to this riddle so perfectly embodies Oedipus' own struggle, this character's answer carries a special poignancy for the reader or viewer of the play.
Oedipus began his life crawling on all fours as one of the lowest of babes, retrieved by a shepherd shortly after being abandoned at birth. In the noontime of his life, he was raised high as a king, standing on two legs. Then, after being exposed as a parricide who had engaged in incest, he was expelled from the city — banished, a terrible fate for the ancient Greeks, into the world of the barbarians — hobbled upon a stick, shamed, blinded, and moving on three legs, just as he had come into the world.
The relationship between Oedipus and the Sphinx seems initially to be that of the heroic quest. The hero seeks an answer and a reward to set the strange city free. He is simultaneously on a personal quest — to avoid his predestined fate of murdering his father and marrying his mother. Yet Oedipus is not simply the archetypal tragic hero of Jungian archetypes. He also becomes the outcast, the source of all the embodied suffering of the plague-ridden city. In fact, over the course of his life, Oedipus passes through three common male archetypes.
He begins as a scapegoat, cast off from his city as a child who has done nothing wrong, save become the victim of a terrible prophecy. In the noontime of his existence, he becomes the questing hero who first successfully confronts the riddling Sphinx to set the city free, and then unsuccessfully attempts to fulfill his self-imposed quest to free the city of disease. He does ultimately succeed at the task of discovering who has caused the plague — but in doing so, he is transformed into the outcast, willingly ostracizing himself from his community and social position out of shame.
This is why the story of Oedipus seems so universal: like all of us, he fulfills multiple roles in his life, depending upon his station. Oedipus' themes uniquely tap into the collective unconscious because they explore not only our relationships with our parents, but our own senses of self, fate, and destiny. Oedipus' tragedy is a tragedy of character. He is a victim of his father's and his own hubris, and of a lack of self-knowledge, as much as he is a victim of fate. A tragic hero has one fatal flaw that brings him down — such as jealousy or pride — despite his illustrious beginnings.
"Pride drives both generations toward ruin"
"Why Oedipus resonates as everyman figure"
You’re 67% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.