Lead Water Contamination in Newark: Effects and Policy Response
This paper examines the lead water contamination crisis in Newark, New Jersey, where water samples collected in 2018 revealed lead levels exceeding federal limits of 15.0 parts per billion. The paper investigates the causes of contamination — primarily aging lead service lines and changes to pH treatment — and details the disproportionate health risks faced by children and pregnant women, including impaired brain development, anemia, and adverse birth outcomes. It also surveys the city's mitigation efforts, such as free testing programs, filter distribution, and pipe-replacement initiatives. Finally, the paper analyzes New Jersey's Bill A676, which mandates lead testing at higher education institutions and requires public disclosure of results, evaluating both its potential benefits and limitations for Newark's ongoing public health response.
- Introduction: Background on Newark's escalating lead crisis
- Causes of Lead-Contaminated Water in Newark: Pipe ownership disputes and pH treatment changes
- Health Effects of Lead-Contaminated Drinking Water: Risks to children, pregnant women, and anemia
- Mitigation Efforts and City Response: Free testing, filters, and pipe-replacement programs
- Bill A676: Environment–Water Supply: Legislation mandating testing at higher education institutions
- Pros and Cons of Bill A676: Accountability benefits versus financial and accuracy concerns
- Conclusion and Recommendations: Urgency of full bill enforcement and pipe replacement
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds the policy discussion in specific, quantified data — such as the 15.8 ppb measurement exceeding the federal 15.0 ppb action level — giving concrete weight to the public health argument.
- Uses a real family's experience (Theo's case) to humanize statistical risk, balancing technical evidence with narrative illustration.
- Moves logically from causes to effects to mitigation and then to legislative analysis, giving the paper a clear problem–solution structure that is easy to follow.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of multi-source synthesis, weaving together public health data, legal developments (the NRDC lawsuit), biochemical mechanisms (delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase inhibition), and legislative analysis (Bill A676) into a unified argument. Rather than treating each source in isolation, the writer connects them to build cumulative evidence for urgency and policy reform.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with background on Newark's lead crisis and the federal action level before moving to the pipe-ownership dispute as a root cause. The central section details health impacts, with separate attention to children, pregnant women, and anemia. A mitigation section surveys city programs, and the final analytical sections evaluate Bill A676's provisions, merits, and drawbacks before a brief conclusion and recommendation urging full enforcement of the bill.
Introduction
According to state-released figures, the levels of lead in drinking water in Newark have never been as high as they are now in 17 years. This may be partly attributable to lead's unique physical properties — including malleability, softness, resistance to corrosion, poor conductibility, and ductility — which make it difficult for industrialists to abandon its use. Lead is employed in various processes, including the manufacture of pipes, fuels, and paint. Despite its industrial usefulness, lead is highly harmful to the environment and to human health (Sol, 2019). Because lead is non-biodegradable, when it is released into the environment it accumulates over time, progressively intensifying its hazardous effects (Wani et al., 2015). Once it enters the body — whether through drinking water or direct contact — lead negatively affects nearly all organ systems.
The elevated levels of lead in Newark's drinking water have elicited strong reactions from residents and advocacy organizations alike. One organization at the forefront of this issue is the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), which, together with the Newark Education Workers Caucus (NEW Caucus), has filed a lawsuit against the city (Sol, 2019). Despite this legal pressure, local municipal officials continued to refute the claims, even after more than ten percent of water samples collected in 2018 were found to contain more than 15.8 parts per billion — exceeding the federal lead action level of 15.0 parts per billion (Muoio & Sam, 2018).
This paper examines the effects of lead-contaminated drinking water on Newark residents, with particular attention to young children and pregnant women. It also surveys current mitigation efforts and analyzes how Bill A676 (environment–water supply) is relevant to addressing the crisis.
Causes of Lead-Contaminated Water in Newark
Municipal officials note that while Newark owns the water mains, it does not own or control the service lines that connect individual homes to the city water supply. The lead in the water originates from the dissolution of lead within these private pipes. Because the leaching occurs in pipes the city does not own, Newark has maintained that it bears no direct responsibility for the lead situation. Furthermore, since private enterprises own the pipes, any corrective measures require extensive cooperation between private citizens and the state (Sol, 2019).
An additional contributing factor is the city's effort — begun around 2012 — to lower the pH level of its water in order to reduce cancer-causing agents. This change in water chemistry may have significantly increased the rate at which lead leaches from the pipes, inadvertently worsening the contamination problem.
References
Hanna-Attisha, M., LaChance, J., Sadler, R. C., & Champney Schnepp, A. (2016). Elevated blood lead levels in children associated with the Flint drinking water crisis: a spatial analysis of risk and public health response. American Journal of Public Health, 106(2), 283–290.
Jasey, N. (2019). Assembly Higher Education Hearing (19:00 1/17/2019 A-4866).
Kiefer, E. (2018). Newark hands out thousands of lead water filters after lawsuit. Patch.
Layden, L. (2018). A water crisis in Newark brings new worries. The New York Times.
Muoio, D., & Sam, S. (2018). Tests revealed high levels of lead in Newark's water in 2015, study finds. Politico.
Panico, R. (2019). Newark exceeds lead levels again, receives 3 other water violations. TAPinto Newark.
Sax, S. (2018). How Newark got lead in its water, and what it means for the rest of America. Vice News.
Sol, M. W. (2019). The lead in Newark's drinking water has hit a 'jaw-dropping' high level, tests show. NJ Advance Media for NJ.com.
Wani, A. L., Ara, A., & Usmani, J. A. (2015). Lead toxicity: a review. Interdisciplinary Toxicology, 8(2), 55–64.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.