This paper examines leadership approaches to implementing organizational change within human resources, drawing on the author's experience as Senior Project Manager at Asurion. It discusses the critical phases of change management—unfreezing entrenched organizational behaviors and refreezing new practices through reinforcement systems—while addressing common obstacles to adoption such as lack of communication and employee resistance. The paper outlines practical strategies for overcoming resistance, including establishing urgency, communicating vision and values, and managing information flow to build organizational alignment during transformation.
Static and unchanging environments rapidly render organizations obsolete. Consequently, change is an invariable and indispensable prerequisite for organizations to remain competitive and endure in an unpredictable global financial system. Organizational change can facilitate streamlining business operations and eliminate redundant systems or groups. The overall change process should create a win-win situation for both the organization and its workforce (Haug & Krabbenhoft, 2006).
At present, as the Senior Project Manager of Asurion, I have initiated certain change opportunities for the advancement of my team members. Rather than viewing change as a top-down mandate, I have sought to foster an environment where transformation aligns organizational goals with employee development. The most significant and complex change opportunity involved what organizational theorists call "unfreezing"—a foundational phase in managing organizational transformation effectively.
Unfreezing entails recognizing and unlearning entrenched organizational behaviors that are sometimes deeply rooted in company culture. This phase is essential because it initiates change from the employee's understanding of organizational challenges or visualization that inspires them to transform. The unfreezing concept, developed by organizational psychologist Kurt Lewin, emphasizes creating awareness that current practices are no longer sustainable. The most critical measure of success at this stage is employee acceptance and willingness to let go of familiar routines.
The next change initiative I implemented was refreezing—the ultimate phase of the transformation process. This phase emphasizes and sustains the new behavior through continuous visibility and measurement of success. One reinforcement mechanism is the employment of recognition and reward systems. According to organizational behavior research, recognition and reward systems encourage elevated performance and motivate employees to embrace change (Jones, 2004). By celebrating early wins and acknowledging those who adapt most effectively, we created positive momentum that extended throughout the team.
While initiating change, I encountered significant obstacles. Primary among these was a lack of information among employees regarding the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed changes. Employees were hesitant because they had not been communicated with regarding the necessity of change. They lacked a clear vision or values concerning the initiative, and a sense of urgency was absent (George & Jones, 2002). Without these foundational elements, even well-intentioned change efforts face substantial resistance.
I took deliberate steps to overcome resistance to change. First, I crafted a sense of urgency based on the company's fiscal performance, competitive position, market situation, and technological trends. This grounded the change effort in concrete business realities rather than abstract ideals.
Second, I furnished a clear vision to employees. Clear organizational vision can provide both a corporate sense of identity and a sense of long-term purpose (George & Jones, 2002). When employees understand not only what is changing but why it matters to the organization's future, they are more likely to support the transition.
Third, I worked to form a shared vision, values, and widespread communication across all levels of the organization. I classified the necessity for change and communicated it throughout the organization using multiple channels and messaging approaches. To lessen resistance, I provided information tailored to different employee perspectives, ensuring that the message aligned with how various groups understood their roles and concerns.
Finally, I emphasized that measurement should be considered during the planning of transformation and before any action is commenced (George & Jones, 2002). This proactive approach to evaluation ensured that we could track progress, identify emerging obstacles, and adjust strategies as needed.
"Communication and measurement for sustained change"
You’re 84% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.