This paper examines the challenges new managers face when transitioning into leadership roles, particularly when promoted internally without adequate training. It discusses the importance of understanding one's own strengths and weaknesses, the needs of employees, and situational flexibility in leadership style. Drawing on Blanchard's situational leadership framework, the paper contrasts situational and contingency theories of leadership, arguing that situational theory is more practically effective. It also weighs the benefits and risks of internal versus external promotions, highlighting how leadership training can mitigate communication breakdowns and help newly promoted managers build authority among former peers.
Leadership style determines the way a manager or leader interacts with others in an organization (Blanchard, 1999). This style does not need to be fixed or unchangeable; instead, it can be flexible and adaptable to suit various situations. Most managers make a mistake in choosing the right leadership style when they feel they must stick with one style in all situations. Inadequate knowledge of leadership styles can result in erroneous choices, and similarly, a manager who does not understand his or her own strengths and weaknesses can make the same mistake. There is not one single reason why a manager would falter when choosing a leadership style — a host of issues can affect that choice.
A person who knows that he can do better by being amiable does not need to adopt an autocratic style, and similarly, a strong charismatic leader does not always need to be a servant leader in order to get the best out of people. Lack of proper leadership training can create all of these conflicts. In order to choose the right leadership style, it is important for managers to:
Leadership training is essential for everyone in a management position. If a person is to supervise or lead a team of workers, it is important that the organization provides sufficient leadership training so that the individual can choose the right style and become a more effective leader. In many organizations, such training is either unheard of or simply not effective. Organizations will typically invest in their future leaders by sending them to attend seminars and courses on leadership, which helps them attain self-confidence, learn more effective ways of communicating, and build a professional vision for themselves and their teams.
However, in organizations where this is not done properly, managers can find themselves in a difficult position. In the case at hand, for example, Cheryl, Rob, and Linda were all promoted to leadership positions without any training in that area. They clearly lacked the skills to command a team and to communicate effectively with members of their teams who had been their peers only a day before. It is important for firms to understand that a great deal changes among employees when one of them is promoted to a senior position. Giving directives to former peers is not an easy task and must be handled with care. For this reason, good leadership training must be provided both before a person is promoted to a senior position and while he or she is in that position, in order to facilitate better communication.
"Comparing two key leadership frameworks"
"Weighing internal versus external leadership appointments"
There is no right or wrong answer to the question of internal promotion. It all depends on how effectively and smoothly a person can move from one position to another. Internal promotions have their downsides, and so does bringing in outsiders to fill key positions. By the same token, internal promotion carries many positives. A person who is promoted internally understands the organizational culture very well. He or she knows the needs of the employees, the problems that exist within the organization, and the targets the firm seeks to reach. An outsider may not be aware of all of this and can make serious errors or find the adjustment process very difficult.
You’re 56% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.