This paper critically reviews Vassalou's (2001) article "The Learning Organization in Health-Care Services: Theory and Practice," published in the Journal of European Industrial Training. The review examines how the article defines learning organizations, identifies the building blocks necessary for their development, and compares theory with real-world practice through qualitative case study research conducted in a UK hospital and a Greek hospital. Key themes include individual versus organizational learning, single versus double loop learning, and the structural and cultural barriers that prevent organizations from fully achieving learning organization status. The paper also evaluates the strengths and limitations of Vassalou's methodology and literature review.
The paper demonstrates the technique of critical article review: it first summarizes the source's research questions, theoretical framework, and findings, then evaluates the quality of both the literature review and the primary research. The author applies an external methodological standard (Pyrczak, 2004) to assess validity, which adds analytical depth beyond simple description.
The paper opens by introducing Vassalou's research questions and aims, then summarizes the literature review and its conclusions about learning organization building blocks. It proceeds to describe the qualitative case study methodology and comparative findings between the UK and Greek hospitals. The final section offers a balanced critical evaluation, acknowledging the article's contributions while identifying weaknesses in the literature review and sample design.
A great deal of research has been undertaken regarding the concept of learning organizations. The 2001 article "The Learning Organization in Health-Care Services: Theory and Practice" by Leda Vassalou was published in the Journal of European Industrial Training. The article sought to add to the existing literature on learning organizations by first clarifying the concept and then examining the barriers which may prevent or hinder a firm from becoming a learning organization.
In order to achieve this aim, Vassalou (2001) identified four research questions. The first involved identifying the difference between individual learning and organizational learning. The second was the identification of the type of learning required to take place within a learning organization. The third asked what building blocks or other foundations were necessary for learning organizations. The fourth, and arguably one of the most interesting questions, was whether a difference exists between learning organizations as depicted in the literature and learning organizations as they operate in the real world.
The paper begins with a literature review, followed by primary research undertaken using case study methodology. Two healthcare organizations were examined to determine the degree to which organizational learning was present: one hospital in the United Kingdom and one hospital in Greece (Vassalou, 2001).
The concept and definition of a learning organization is constructed through the article's literature review. Vassalou (2001) argues that a learning organization is built on the concept of organizational learning, which in turn is built on learning undertaken by individuals. Vassalou (2001) states that learning involves the gaining of knowledge, and can include the concepts of "know-how" and "know-why." A range of authors are cited, including Argyris and Schön, with the view that learning only occurs when knowledge is applied to create different, repeatable behavior.
The idea of organizational learning is aligned with the presence of double loop learning in an organization, rather than simply single loop learning. The literature review concludes that learning at an organizational level is most likely to occur where individuals within the organization are both allowed and encouraged to learn. For a learning organization to emerge, suitable building blocks must include several characteristics that create an environment in which learning becomes part of the organizational culture, rather than a separate exercise.
These building blocks include: a leadership style that not only supports learning but actively encourages experimentation; cultural systems that facilitate the transfer of knowledge between workers; processes that support creativity and innovation; a high level of cooperative teamwork; a strong mission and vision that also supports the acquisition of knowledge; and a permissive culture that allows experimentation, including the ability to learn from mistakes (Vassalou, 2001). Organizational structure is also identified as an influencing factor that may either support or hinder the development of a learning organization.
You’re 42% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.