Skip to main content
Essay Undergraduate 679 words

Legal Writing Conventions: Formal vs. Informal Style

~4 min read 5 sections Law
Abstract

This paper examines legal writing conventions by contrasting two distinct writing styles: an informal personal letter and a formal legal liability analysis. Through this comparison, the paper identifies key differences in diction, sentence structure, tone, and the use of concrete versus abstract language. It demonstrates how formal legal writing relies on polysyllabic vocabulary, logical reasoning, and precise expression, while informal writing depends on emotional appeals and colloquial language. The paper also reflects on how concrete language promotes clarity and reduces ambiguity in legal contexts.

Key Takeaways
  • Introduction: Two Modes of Writing: Overview of two contrasting writing samples
  • Informal Personal Letter: Colloquial letter ending a personal relationship
  • Formal Legal Liability Analysis: Formal analysis of criminal liability in a case
  • Comparing Formal and Informal Writing Styles: Diction, tone, and structure differences examined
  • Concrete vs. Abstract Language in Legal Writing: Why concrete language improves legal clarity
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾

What makes this paper effective

  • Uses a direct side-by-side comparison of two writing samples to illustrate abstract concepts about style and tone in a concrete, accessible way.
  • Grounds its stylistic observations in specific textual examples (e.g., use of contractions, the em-dash, polysyllabic diction), making the analysis precise rather than vague.
  • Connects the discussion of formal versus informal writing to the broader principle of concrete versus abstract language, giving the paper a cohesive analytical thread.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates comparative textual analysis: presenting two original writing samples and then systematically identifying and evaluating their distinguishing features. This technique is especially useful in legal writing courses, where students must learn to recognize the conventions of professional legal prose by contrasting it with everyday language.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with an informal personal letter written in colloquial, emotionally charged language. It then offers a short formal legal analysis identifying criminal liability. Finally, the third section compares both pieces, examining differences in diction, sentence structure, and the use of concrete versus abstract language. The structure moves from demonstration to reflection, allowing the comparison to arise organically from the two samples.

Essay 679 words

Introduction: Two Modes of Writing

The following exercise illustrates the conventions of legal writing by presenting two distinct writing samples — an informal personal letter and a formal legal analysis — and then comparing them in terms of diction, tone, structure, and the use of concrete versus abstract language.

Informal Personal Letter

I am no longer willing to continue in a relationship with you. I have tried very hard over the past several months to be patient with you. However, I simply cannot tolerate your behavior any longer. In fact, I am convinced there is something very wrong with you.

It is simply unacceptable for you to hang up the phone on me, repeatedly, in the middle of our conversations. I can't think of anything more rude in a long-distance relationship when two people spend so much time on the phone. I don't understand how you can profess to care for me and then behave in such a pathological manner.

Perhaps that pathology is why you run out of restaurants when we're together. You don't seem to realize that crawling on the floor to get out of a booth is unacceptable behavior, and indicative of some deep-rooted problem on your end. The same sentiment applies to the multiple times you have gotten in my face waving your hands like you're going to strike me. For me to stay with you I would have to devalue myself as much as you do, which is why I'm much better off without you.

Formal Legal Liability Analysis

In the aforementioned scenario, B is liable for a number of criminal actions. In fact, B is solely liable for all criminality discussed within this particular case study. He is liable for theft of A's credit card number — which is not the same as being held liable for stealing the card itself. What he stole was the number, which he used for legal purposes (to access pornography). Additionally, B is also liable for damaging A's property by cracking A's safe. B is responsible for whatever damage was done to the safe in order to obtain the credit card information inside. Thus, B is primarily liable for inflicting property damage and for stealing A's credit card number.

Comparing Formal and Informal Writing Styles

The most distinguishable difference between the two types of writing presented in this document is that the letter is far more colloquial and informal than the legal liability analysis. In terms of diction, the latter utilizes more polysyllabic words such as additionally and criminality. The diction in the letter, by contrast, is characterized by words people use in everyday speech rather than in formal writing. Examples include the repeated use of the word very, which is neither descriptive nor academic.

This difference is also reflected in the style of each response. The letter relies on informal contractions, whereas the legal analysis employs more sophisticated sentence structures. The use of the em-dash is a good example of this distinction. On the whole, the second response is far more analytical than the first. The letter relies on unprofessional emotional appeals to make its point, while the legal analysis is grounded in logic and a refined expression of language.

1 Section Hidden · 85 words
Concrete vs. Abstract Language in Legal Writing85 words
Abstract words and phrases are less defined than concrete words and phrases, which are explicit and readily identifiable for their association with designated meaning. The more effectual words and phrases are the concrete ones. They…

References

Tyler, T. (2012). Nailing the Baby Bar: How to Write Essays for the California First Year Law Student Exam. Practical Step Press.

Already a member? Log in

Unlock the rest of this paper

135,000+ research papers · AI writing tools · Plagiarism & AI detection

Monthly

$12.99Per month

Renews at $12.99/month until canceled

Start Monthly
Best value

Annual

$99Per year

Renews at $99/year until canceled

Start Annual
  • Unlimited AI writing tools
  • Plagiarism and AI text detection tool
Secure checkout

Plan details

Unlimited AI writing tools are for individual, non-automated use and are subject to our Terms of Service and abuse-prevention measures.

TextChecker scans: 1 during the 24-Hour Pass, or 5 per month with Monthly and Annual.

Prices exclude applicable tax.

Key Concepts in This Paper
Legal Writing Formal Diction Informal Tone Liability Analysis Concrete Language Abstract Language Writing Style Comparative Analysis Colloquial Language Legal Conventions
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Legal Writing Conventions: Formal vs. Informal Style. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/legal-writing-conventions-formal-vs-informal-2163924

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.