Changing Legal Norms and the Individual in Modern Society
This paper examines how the law functions not as a barrier to behavior but as a system of consequences, and how its continuous evolution reshapes the position of the individual within society. Drawing on examples from criminal law, civil law, and equal rights jurisprudence, the paper traces the effects of landmark legal changes — including Alcohol Prohibition, the development of contract and tort law, and the civil rights legislation of the mid-twentieth century — on the everyday lives of ordinary Americans. The paper argues that because law defines remedies rather than preventing conduct, its evolution has profound and sometimes immediate effects on what is permissible, obligatory, or punishable at any given time and place.
- Introduction: Law as a System of Consequences: Law defines consequences, not conduct itself
- Criminal Law: Prohibition and Its Legacy: Prohibition's overnight criminalization and lasting social impact
- Civil Law: Contracts, Torts, and Evolving Liability: Evolving contract and tort law reshape individual liability
- Equal Rights: Race, Education, and Employment Law: Civil rights law transforms African-American legal status
- Conclusion: Law, History, and the Individual: Civil War as ultimate example of law's social power
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses concrete historical examples — Prohibition, Hadley v. Baxendale, Brown v. Board of Education — to ground abstract legal principles in tangible human experience.
- Maintains a consistent thesis throughout: that law operates as a system of consequences rather than prohibitions, and that its evolution directly repositions the individual within society.
- Balances breadth across criminal, civil, and constitutional law while keeping each section focused on a single illustrative example or principle.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses the compare-and-contrast of legal "before and after" moments — such as the overnight criminalization and later decriminalization of alcohol under the Eighteenth and Twenty-First Amendments — to make the abstract concept of legal relativity vivid and persuasive. This technique anchors theoretical claims about how law shapes individual status in specific, datable historical events.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a theoretical framing of law as consequence rather than prohibition, then moves through three substantive sections organized by legal domain: criminal law (Prohibition), civil law (contract and tort), and constitutional/equal rights law. Each section applies the central thesis to its domain. A brief conclusion ties the argument back to the largest possible illustration — the American Civil War — as the ultimate example of law's power to reshape individual and collective life.
Introduction: Law as a System of Consequences
Many legal scholars have observed that the law does not actually define what a person may or may not do; rather, it describes what remedies and penalties flow as consequences of one's behavior.1 In matters of civil law, contracts do not prevent one from acting in violation of explicit agreements — they merely prescribe remedies (usually monetary) that the courts may enforce against one for breaching a contract, as well as compensation for parties wronged by that breach. Likewise, in the realm of criminal law, statutes do not prevent any criminal acts or behavior; they merely define what monetary penalties or potential terms of incarceration result from violating those statutes.2
Nevertheless, the vast majority of people in society choose to honor their civil contractual obligations, since the consequences of failing to do so are likely to be more expensive than fulfilling their commitments. Similarly, whether also as a function of moral conscience or not, most people refrain from serious transgressions of penal law simply because the consequences of criminal prosecution serve as a quite effective deterrent.
The law itself is a constantly evolving creature, which may, over time, undergo very profound changes and even complete reversals of public policy. Therefore, in many respects, the relative position of the individual within society also changes in accordance with statutory definitions of his rights and obligations under the laws in effect at any particular time. Laws also vary significantly from place to place because, unless usurped by federal jurisdiction, individual states maintain significantly different legal standards and requirements applicable within their borders — making "legality" and "illegality" strictly a matter dependent on location.3
Bibliography
Abrams, Natalie, and Buckner, Michael D. Medical Ethics: A Clinical Textbook and Reference for the Health Care Professionals. Cambridge, MA: [University] Press, 1983.
Carter, Lief H. Reason in Law. Boston: Little, Brown, 1979.
Gilmore, Grant. The Death of Contract. Ohio: OSU Press, 1974.
Lerner, Max. America as a Civilization. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1957.
Taylor, Richard. Freedom, Anarchy and the Law. Buffalo: Prometheus, 1982.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.