Little Lamb Company: Employee vs. Contractor Legal Analysis
This paper examines a workplace scenario involving Little Lamb Company and a contract worker named Mary. Using principles of employment law, the paper evaluates Mary's classification as an independent contractor, the implications of an at-will employment state, and three potential breach claims: breach of public policy, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and breach of implied contract. The analysis considers factors such as the use of company equipment, work schedule integration, duration of service, and contractual language to determine whether Little Lamb acted legally in terminating Mary's services and subsequently hiring a different contractor.
- Scenario Overview: Background facts of the Little Lamb case
- Mary's Status as an Independent Contractor: Classifying Mary as contractor, not employee
- At-Will Employment and Contract Extension: At-will doctrine applied to Mary's extended contract
- Breach of Public Policy: No public policy violation found
- Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith: Fair dealing assessment between both parties
- Breach of Implied Contract: Implied contractual expectations and contractor language
- Conclusion: Little Lamb acted legally under at-will rules
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Organizes a multi-issue legal scenario into clearly labeled parts, making it easy to follow the analysis of each distinct claim.
- Applies established employment law concepts — including at-will doctrine and implied contract theory — directly to the specific facts of the scenario.
- Acknowledges factual ambiguities (e.g., how Mary is paid, whether she works for multiple firms) and explains how those ambiguities affect the legal conclusions.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates issue-spotting and rule application, a core legal writing technique. Each section identifies a specific legal issue, states the relevant rule or doctrine, and applies it to the facts of the Little Lamb scenario. This IRAC-style reasoning (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) is standard in law and business law courses and gives the analysis a structured, professional quality.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief scenario overview, then works through four numbered parts: contractor classification, employment extension, at-will doctrine, and breach analysis. The breach section is further divided into three sub-issues — public policy, implied covenant, and implied contract — each treated as a standalone analysis. References are provided in a standard list at the end.
Scenario Overview
Little Lamb Company requires an additional employee to complete a special project. They contract Mary for this position and enter into a contract with her. Just as the project nears completion, Little Lamb realizes it needs Mary's services longer and asks her to continue with the company. While completing the new project, the supervisor observes that Mary must use company materials and equipment in order to meet the job requirements.
Two years pass, and an economic downturn requires Little Lamb to make budget cuts, including the elimination of Mary's position. A month later, Little Lamb receives another major contract requiring the services of a programmer like Mary. However, instead of rehiring Mary, the supervisor decides to hire his equally qualified cousin. This situation raises concerns about Mary's status as an employee, the at-will employment clause, breach of policy, and breach of contract.
Mary's Status as an Independent Contractor
Mary is hired as a contract employee because she enters into a specific relationship with Little Lamb. An independent contractor is a person who works for a company under certain legally defined terms but is not considered a permanent employee and is not entitled to the benefits or considerations afforded to a formally hired employee. Mary remained a contract employee because the definition of her job and contract changed and she was asked to continue under the same contractual arrangement.
References
Andrews, N. (2011). Contract law. Cambridge University Press.
Independent contractor — Self-employed or employee? (2012). Internal Revenue Service. Retrieved from https://www.irs.gov
Rothstein, M., et al. (1987). Cases and materials on employment law. Foundation Press.
Already a member? Log in
Unlock the rest of this paper
135,000+ research papers · AI writing tools · Plagiarism & AI detection
7-Day Pass
Does not renew
Get 7-Day PassMonthly
Renews at $12.99/month until canceled
Start MonthlyAnnual
Renews at $99/year until canceled
Start Annual- Unlimited AI writing tools
- Plagiarism and AI text detection tool
Plan details
Unlimited AI writing tools are for individual, non-automated use and are subject to our Terms of Service and abuse-prevention measures.
TextChecker scans: 3 during the 7-Day Pass, or 5 per month with Monthly and Annual.
Prices exclude applicable tax.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.