At-Will Employment and Independent Contractor Status
This paper presents a legal memorandum prepared for the Little Lamb Company addressing the lawfulness of an employee's termination. It examines the distinction between independent contractors and standard employees using established criteria, then analyzes the doctrine of at-will employment to determine whether Mary's release from her position constitutes actionable wrongdoing. The memo considers potential claims including breach of public policy, breach of implied contract, and breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, ultimately concluding that the termination was legally permissible and that Mary has insufficient grounds for a successful legal complaint.
- Introduction and Purpose of Memo: Memo establishes Mary as independent contractor
- Defining Independent Contractor Status: Criteria distinguishing contractors from employees
- At-Will Employment Doctrine: At-will employment rules and legal exceptions
- Legality of Mary's Termination: Applying law to conclude termination was lawful
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The memo applies specific legal criteria systematically to a concrete factual scenario, grounding each conclusion in recognizable employment law standards.
- It anticipates counterarguments — acknowledging factors that could suggest employee status — and rebuts them with a principled distinction between essential and merely common characteristics of contract work.
- The analysis addresses multiple potential legal theories (public policy, implied contract, implied covenant) rather than relying on a single line of reasoning, demonstrating thoroughness.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates applied legal reasoning: the writer identifies the governing legal standard, maps the relevant facts onto that standard, and draws a conclusion. This IRAC-adjacent structure (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) is characteristic of professional legal writing and shows how abstract doctrine is operationalized in real workplace disputes.
Structure breakdown
The memo opens by establishing its purpose and conclusion upfront. It then defines independent contractor status with bullet-point criteria before pivoting to the at-will employment doctrine. The final section applies both frameworks to Mary's specific situation, addressing discrimination, implied contract, and good faith claims in turn. References follow standard APA formatting.
Introduction and Purpose of Memo
Memo: The Little Lamb Company
Regarding our recent discussion about potential legal issues that might arise concerning Mary's termination, it must be concluded that, based on the evidence, Mary is clearly an independent contractor.
Defining Independent Contractor Status
Independent contractors may be distinguished from standard employees based upon the following criteria:
It is true that certain factors typically associated with contract employment are not present in this case, given that Mary worked very closely with a supervisor, used company materials, and adhered to a company schedule (Feig, 2007). However, working alone off-premises and using personal materials are merely characteristics frequently associated with contract employment, rather than essential characteristics of it. The employee-employer relationship has not changed substantively over time; the only difference is that certain additional requirements were placed upon the contract work Mary was performing.
At-Will Employment Doctrine
The doctrine of at-will employment means that an employee may be dismissed for any reason, or for no reason, so long as the action does not violate federal anti-discrimination law based on the employee's membership in a protected category such as race, religion, gender, age, or disability. "Similarly, you cannot be fired because you have complained about illegal activity, about discrimination or harassment, or about health and safety violations in the workplace" (Guerin, 2014). Otherwise, "if you are employed at will, your employer does not need good cause to fire you" (Guerin, 2014).
References
Feig, E. (2007). Employee versus independent contractor: Differences you need to know. LegalZoom. Retrieved from
Guerin, L. (2014). Employment at will. Nolo. Retrieved from
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.