This paper presents a legal memorandum prepared for the Little Lamb Company addressing the lawfulness of an employee's termination. It examines the distinction between independent contractors and standard employees using established criteria, then analyzes the doctrine of at-will employment to determine whether Mary's release from her position constitutes actionable wrongdoing. The memo considers potential claims including breach of public policy, breach of implied contract, and breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, ultimately concluding that the termination was legally permissible and that Mary has insufficient grounds for a successful legal complaint.
Memo: The Little Lamb Company
Regarding our recent discussion about potential legal issues that might arise concerning Mary's termination, it must be concluded that, based on the evidence, Mary is clearly an independent contractor.
Independent contractors may be distinguished from standard employees based upon the following criteria:
It is true that certain factors typically associated with contract employment are not present in this case, given that Mary worked very closely with a supervisor, used company materials, and adhered to a company schedule (Feig, 2007). However, working alone off-premises and using personal materials are merely characteristics frequently associated with contract employment, rather than essential characteristics of it. The employee-employer relationship has not changed substantively over time; the only difference is that certain additional requirements were placed upon the contract work Mary was performing.
The doctrine of at-will employment means that an employee may be dismissed for any reason, or for no reason, so long as the action does not violate federal anti-discrimination law based on the employee's membership in a protected category such as race, religion, gender, age, or disability. "Similarly, you cannot be fired because you have complained about illegal activity, about discrimination or harassment, or about health and safety violations in the workplace" (Guerin, 2014). Otherwise, "if you are employed at will, your employer does not need good cause to fire you" (Guerin, 2014).
"Applying law to conclude termination was lawful"
You’re 44% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.