This paper examines the Manhattan Project, the United States government's World War II program to develop an atomic bomb before Nazi Germany or Japan. Beginning with the scientific challenges faced by General Leslie Groves and his team — including controlling nuclear chain reactions and isolating fissile isotopes — the paper traces the project from its 1942 origins through the successful Trinity test in New Mexico. It then addresses the moral and strategic debate surrounding President Truman's decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, weighing the civilian casualties caused against the potentially far greater losses that a land invasion of Japan would have produced.
In 1939, the United States learned through various intelligence channels that Nazi Germany was planning to develop an atomic bomb. This was startling and alarming news, as the prospect of the Nazis possessing the most powerful weapon in the world was deeply troubling. In response, the United States began its own program to develop and build an atomic bomb before the Nazis or the Japanese could do so. Launched in 1942 under the Army Corps of Engineers, this effort became known as the Manhattan Project. The atomic bomb developed through this program was ultimately dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This paper examines the history behind the Manhattan Project and analyzes whether or not the United States was right to drop the bomb it developed.
General Leslie R. Groves, Chief of Construction for the Army Corps of Engineers, was selected to lead the Manhattan Project. The project faced significant hurdles from the very beginning, and General Groves had to find ways to overcome them. It was still early in the study of atomic science, and scientists were only just beginning to understand atoms and how they worked.
At the time, only two types of atomic reactions were known: fusion and fission. A fusion reaction derives its power from combining the nuclei of several hydrogen isotopes to produce helium nuclei. This reaction is used to produce the fusion bomb, otherwise known as the hydrogen bomb. Fission, by contrast, occurs when the nucleus of an atom splits into two roughly equal fragments. A neutron strikes and breaks the nucleus, and the resulting fragments release additional neutrons, which in turn break up more atomic nuclei — a process known as a fission chain reaction. A fission reaction can also initiate a fusion reaction. These concepts were only barely understood at the time of the Manhattan Project, and it fell to the project's scientists to learn how to control these processes and direct them into a controlled explosion — no easy task.
The second major challenge facing the Manhattan Project was finding an adequate and plentiful fuel source for the bombs. Niels Bohr, who pioneered the study of atomic science, determined that the uranium isotope was a strong candidate, as it was unstable and capable of sustaining a chain reaction. Glen Seaborg, another atomic scientist, concluded that the plutonium isotope could function in the same way. Obtaining these elements in usable form, however, presented its own serious difficulties.
The isotopes had to be separated from their parent elements through a process that was not yet fully understood. Magnetic separation was initially attempted, but it proved severely flawed and could not produce the purity and quantity of isotopes required for a bomb. After roughly one million dollars in construction costs, only about a gram of isotopes had been produced by this method. Gaseous diffusion was subsequently discovered and proved to be a far more efficient means of obtaining the required isotopes.
"Chicago reaction leads to New Mexico Trinity test"
"Truman weighs invasion costs against atomic strike"
"Bombings end war; ethical debate persists today"
You’re 33% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.