This paper examines the artistic traditions of the Māori people of New Zealand, with a focus on wood carving and tā moko — the practice of carving images directly into human skin. It explores the religious and social frameworks of tapu and noa that governed Māori artistic production, the symbolic meanings of common figures such as human forms, reptiles, and birds, and the deeply sacred status of skilled carvers within Māori society. The paper also considers how Western museums and art collectors have decontextualized Māori artifacts by treating them as aesthetic objects rather than culturally and spiritually significant items, drawing on R.W. Firth's critique of that approach.
The Māori are a people who inhabit New Zealand with heritage rooted in the Pacific and Polynesian regions. Their culture is an extraordinarily rich one that has survived appropriation and colonization by Great Britain and other cultures. One of the ways the Māori people sustained their ancient culture was through the creation of works of art. Of particular importance to the continuation of that culture was their remarkable tradition of artistic carving. So central was the ability to carve that generations would literally carry artistic identity on their faces, carving images and icons into their skin as representations of their heritage.
Two concepts were of foundational importance to the Māori people: tapu and noa. Tapu was a religious idea encompassing everything considered holy within Māori society. In Māori culture, anything that is tapu is held to a standard beyond normal human interaction (Maori). This concept also related to the class system of the Māori: items belonging to a high class of society could not be touched by members of a lower class, and vice versa. Anyone who breached the laws of tapu faced the wrath of the gods. Noa is the direct opposite of tapu — these were laws relating to the common person and ordinary things. Art fell strictly under the parameters of tapu.
The original carvings of the Māori were considered sacred. Being a skilled carver was akin to holding a religious position, for the trees and plant life used as materials were sacred as well. If a person was an adept carver, it was understood that the gods themselves had granted them the ability to transform sacred material into something equally holy (Gathercole 171). The gods were believed to communicate through the artistry of the carvers. Because both the wood and the skill were of such importance, women and other lower-ranking members of the community were banned from touching even the shavings left over from the carvings.
Historians have noted that many different types of images were carved by Māori sculptors. Among the most favored subjects was the human figure. Notably, sculptors made clear which gender was depicted in each carving, but would limit the size of the female figure's upper anatomy so that the only reliable means of distinguishing male from female was the lower genitalia of the figure (Hamilton 7).
Beyond human figures, other natural subjects appear frequently in Māori art. Depictions of reptiles such as lizards, as well as birds, are common (Archey 171). These animals were native to New Zealand and carried symbolic significance within Māori culture. Fish and whales are also depicted in Māori artworks. All of these animals fulfilled some form of need for the Māori people, whether as sources of food, clothing materials, or religious symbolism.
"Sacred practice of carving designs into human skin"
"Critique of how museums strip Māori artifacts of meaning"
The Māori culture is exemplified by the art that was created, just as art of any culture fulfills the role of historian and works as testimony to a people's way of life. For the Māori, tā moko — the carving of designs into the skin — was a symbol of their culture and a representation of what held the deepest importance to them. That ancient culture could never have imagined that modern peoples would take items of sacred and holy significance and display them for the entire world as mere aesthetic objects. Based on the way even the scraps from wood carvings were treated as sacred, it is highly unlikely that the Māori would have appreciated their icons being handled as art installations stripped of their original meaning.
You’re 48% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.