Marriage and Divorce in the Bible: Old and New Testament Views
This paper examines the biblical concept of marriage from both Old and New Testament perspectives, tracing how ancient Israelite custom, Pauline theology, and Christian sacramental tradition define marriage as a permanent, divinely sanctioned covenant. It contrasts the biblical framework — in which marriage is a lasting union before God — with the modern secular view of marriage as a dissolvable legal contract. The paper also discusses the biblical grounds for divorce, the positions of Catholic and Protestant traditions, and how contemporary theology attempts to balance the ideal of marital permanence with recognition of human fallibility and God's capacity for forgiveness and renewal.
- Introduction: Marriage in Ancient Israel and Today: Marriage as lifelong covenant versus modern personal choice
- New Testament Teachings on Marriage and Sexuality: Paul's teaching on celibacy, marriage, and fornication
- Biblical and Modern Views on Divorce: Stricter biblical divorce grounds versus secular permissiveness
- The Reformation Challenge to Catholic Marriage Doctrine: Reformers critique Catholic annulment hypocrisy and rigidity
- Transcendent Meaning of Marriage and the Possibility of Renewal: Marriage as spiritual struggle open to God's forgiveness
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper consistently grounds its claims in a single authoritative reference — Elwell's Evangelical Dictionary of Biblical Theology — and cites it precisely, lending the argument scholarly credibility despite its brevity.
- It effectively contrasts ancient, biblical, and modern secular perspectives in a clear progression, helping readers understand how attitudes toward marriage have shifted over time.
- The inclusion of the Protestant Reformation debate adds historical depth and prevents the argument from becoming one-dimensional, acknowledging legitimate theological disagreement within Christianity.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the use of comparative theological analysis: it places biblical texts and denominational doctrines in dialogue with modern secular norms, using a single comprehensive reference source to anchor multiple distinct claims. Direct quotation from scripture (1 Corinthians 7:9) alongside secondary theological commentary shows how to integrate primary and secondary sources within one argument.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an overview of marriage in ancient Israel, moves through New Testament theology and Pauline teaching, addresses divorce doctrine in both Testaments, examines the Reformation critique of Catholic annulment practice, and concludes by reconciling marital permanence with God's forgiveness. Each paragraph advances the argument chronologically and theologically, building toward a nuanced, balanced conclusion. Approximately 600 words across five logical sections.
Introduction: Marriage in Ancient Israel and Today
In ancient Israel, marriage was largely a social construct arranged between parents for their children. Divorce was possible but largely confined to the very wealthy, and even the Old Testament presumption was that marriage was a lasting, lifelong covenant (Elwell 1996: 346). The custom of marriage was often a "family" affair, with parents governing the union rather than the personal will of the participants (Elwell 1996: 740). Today, marriage is largely considered a matter of personal choice without theological significance, much less an analog to the relationship between humanity and God (Elwell 1996: 743). Although some aspects of the modern conception of marriage may seem to have positive benefits — particularly its emphasis on the spiritual bonds between individuals rather than social obligations — the biblical concept of marriage as a permanent union that cannot be dissolved, because of its spiritual as well as social and personal components, has been lost in many respects. Love is more than a physical act (Elwell 1996: 708).
New Testament Teachings on Marriage and Sexuality
In modernity, the New Testament concept stresses the eternal and unalterable nature of marriage, in contrast to the modern view, which sees marriage as a legal bond that can be dissolved with the proper protocols if one or both parties differ in some respect. One of the most oft-quoted New Testament passages regarding marriage is Paul's comment that it is "better to marry than to burn" (1 Corinthians 7:9). This implies that celibacy and a life completely focused on God is superior, but that the marital context provides relief from ungoverned sexual urges. Unmarried sexuality is considered fornication, unlike sexual congress within a marital context (Elwell 1996: 462).
Reference
Elwell, W. (1996). Evangelical Dictionary of Biblical Theology. Baker Publishing Group.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.