This paper examines the concept of marriage and marital relationships as portrayed by Octavia Butler in Kindred and Alejo Carpentier in The Lost Steps. Through a comparative reading of the two novels' female protagonists — Dana and Rosario — the paper argues that both authors project images of women who possess wisdom about marriage, yet differ significantly in their outlook. Rosario views marriage as an instrument of patriarchal subjugation, while Dana experiences a more congenial partnership with her husband Kevin. Together, the two novels reframe marriage in postmodern society not as a hierarchical union but as a mutual partnership grounded in respect and equality.
Literature has functioned, over time, as the "reflector" of the social realities that people experience in society. Works of literature chronicle, narrate, and illustrate to readers a particular social reality as perceived and experienced by the writer. Through literature, readers encounter a subjective point of view of what life is like in a particular period or era. Indeed, literature allows society to appreciate and come to know the arduous yet fascinating history of humanity.
In the works of Octavia Butler and Alejo Carpentier, readers witness the truth behind this assertion. Through Butler's Kindred and Carpentier's The Lost Steps, the social issue of women's subjugation or empowerment through marriage becomes the central theme. This paper argues that both Butler's and Carpentier's portrayals of their female protagonists project the image of an empowered woman who has gained wisdom about marriage. However, it also becomes evident that, despite their empowerment and wisdom concerning marital relationships, Dana of Kindred holds a more positive view of marriage than Rosario of The Lost Steps.
Carpentier's portrayal of Rosario's character in The Lost Steps reveals the subjugation she perceives once a woman enters into a legally binding relationship such as marriage. According to Rosario: "Marriage, the legal bond, deprived a woman of all her defenses against man. A legal wife . . . was one for whom the husband could send the police when she left the house where he was free to indulge his infidelity, his cruelty, or his drunkenness. To marry was to come under laws drawn up by men and not women." In this passage, Rosario demonstrates her wisdom by articulating a pointed truth: since marriage is a ritual reinforced by characteristically patriarchal societies, there is a real danger that the institution of marriage operates in favor of men.
"Dana experiences congenial but patriarchy-shadowed marriage"
"Both protagonists navigate empowerment within patriarchal structures"
"Synthesis reframes marriage as mutual, equal partnership"
You’re 49% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.