This paper analyzes the product safety crisis faced by Mattel, the world's largest toy manufacturer, stemming from two major defects in its Chinese-manufactured toys: loose magnets in Polly Pocket play sets and excessive lead levels in painted toys. The paper traces the origins of these problems to Mattel's complex, multilayered supply chain in China, which made direct quality oversight difficult. It examines the health risks associated with both hazards, reviews the specific recalls undertaken between 2006 and 2007, and evaluates the corrective measures Mattel adopted. The paper concludes with recommendations for stricter manufacturing guidelines, supplier audits, and enhanced product testing protocols to prevent future recalls.
Mattel was founded by Harold Matson and Elliot Handler in 1944. The company began by manufacturing dollhouse furniture and picture frames. Its first mass-produced product was the music box, which established Mattel in the toy business. Company growth was propelled by the introduction of Barbie in 1959, with Ken introduced two years later. Harold Matson eventually sold his share of the company to Elliot Handler and his wife. In 1948, Ruth Handler — Elliot's wife — formally incorporated the company, and Mattel went public in 1960.
To reduce production costs, Mattel established several contracts with principal vendors in China. These vendors manufactured toys on Mattel's behalf and, in turn, would often use smaller subcontractors for the partial or full production of individual toys. Because of this subcontracting structure, the supply chain became long and complex. Mattel maintained direct contact only with its principal vendors, leaving significant portions of the production process beyond its immediate oversight.
When it came to corporate responsibility, Mattel was considered an industry leader. The safety of its products was a central concern, and the company worked to ensure that all products met quality standards and were free of hazards. This reputation was severely damaged in 2007, when it was discovered that some of its products contained lead levels exceeding the permissible limits set by U.S. federal toy safety policy. The discovery triggered a massive recall of toys manufactured in China between April 2007 and July 2007.
The case study identifies two main product safety problems: an excessive amount of lead in the toy paint, and loose magnets in certain toys. Loose magnets were used primarily in building block toys and children's jewelry. The availability and low cost of powerful small magnets had made them attractive to toy manufacturers for use in building block sets and play sets. On some products, however, the magnets would detach during play, creating a risk that a child might swallow them.
The primary danger associated with swallowed magnets is that if a child ingests two or more, the magnets can attract one another through the walls of the intestines, causing perforations or dangerous blockages — both of which can be fatal. Mattel was compelled to recall 2.4 million Polly Pocket play sets after reports of 170 cases in which children had swallowed magnets, including three children who required surgery to remove them. The recalled play sets had been sold between May 2003 and September 2006, and the recall announcement was made on November 21, 2006.
Lead in children's products is a serious health hazard. Exposure to high levels of lead affects virtually every organ in the human body. In children specifically, elevated lead exposure is associated with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), IQ deficits, slowed reaction time, and impaired motor skills. In recognition of these dangers, the U.S. government limits the permissible amount of lead in children's products to no more than 600 parts per million (ppm).
In many developing countries, the use of lead in paint is neither restricted nor banned. Manufacturers in these regions frequently use lead-based paints because lead is highly corrosion-resistant and produces bright, visually appealing colors — qualities that make finished products attractive to consumers. This regulatory gap created conditions in which lead-containing materials could enter Mattel's supply chain without detection, particularly given the limited direct oversight Mattel exercised over its subcontractors.
"Lee Der and Early Light products recalled"
"Magnet reinforcement and supply chain reforms proposed"
The recall of affected products was a necessary first step for addressing both the magnet and lead paint problems, ensuring that children already in possession of the toys were protected from further harm. Going forward, Mattel should conduct regular audits of all approved paint suppliers to verify that the materials used contain only permissible levels of lead. Strict manufacturing guidelines, applicable to all offshore production facilities, would help guarantee that every product meets Mattel's quality and safety standards — regardless of where in the supply chain it was produced.
Increasing the frequency and scope of product testing is also critical. Rather than testing only selected products, comprehensive testing across all product lines would substantially reduce the likelihood of a future recall. Finally, maintaining regular communication with manufacturing plants in China is essential to ensuring those facilities adhere to established regulations and to reinforcing the company's broader commitment to product safety. Together, these measures address both the immediate defects and the underlying structural vulnerabilities that allowed them to occur.
You’re 64% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.