Ethics and Legalities of Medication Error Disclosure
This paper examines the ethical and legal dimensions of medication error disclosure in nursing practice. Drawing on established nursing literature and Kentucky state law, the paper argues that nurses have a clear ethical duty to disclose errors to both patients and staff, regardless of severity, in order to maintain transparency and trust. It also outlines the legal implications of disclosure versus non-disclosure, noting that immediate disclosure generally reduces the likelihood of legal action. The paper further discusses the Institute for Safe Medication Practices' ten key elements for preventing medication errors, covering areas such as patient and drug information gathering, SBAR communication, environmental factors, staff education, patient education, and quality risk management processes.
- Introduction: The Duty to Disclose: Nurse's ethical duty to inform patients of errors
- Ethical Implications of Disclosure and Non-Disclosure: Transparency and trust in the nurse-patient relationship
- Legal Considerations and Kentucky Law: Legal outcomes and Kentucky statutes on disclosure
- Applying Disclosure Principles in Advanced Practice Nursing: First-person nursing stance on disclosing errors
- Preventing Medication Errors: ISMP's 10 Key Elements: ISMP framework for safe medication prescribing practice
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper clearly integrates ethical, legal, and procedural dimensions of a single clinical issue, giving the argument both theoretical grounding and practical application.
- It moves logically from abstract principle (ethics and law) to concrete action (ISMP's 10 key elements), demonstrating how policy translates into nursing practice.
- The first-person nursing perspective adds professional authenticity and shows the student's ability to apply content to a real clinical scenario.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses source synthesis: rather than summarizing each source in isolation, it weaves together multiple citations (Philipsen & Soeken, Edwin, Kentucky Revised Statutes, Anderson) to build a cohesive, multi-dimensional argument about disclosure obligations and error prevention strategies.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by establishing the ethical and legal framework for disclosure, citing both academic literature and state statute. It then transitions to a personal professional stance, before shifting focus to the procedural side of error prevention through the ISMP's ten key elements. The structure moves from "why disclose" to "how to prevent errors in the first place," creating a logical and complete response to the topic.
Introduction: The Duty to Disclose
As Philipsen and Soeken (2011) note, it is the nurse's duty and ethical responsibility to inform the patient of any medical error in treatment, even if the error is "insignificant." The patient still has a right to know, as do all individuals impacted by the error, including staff members. This commitment to openness allows the medical community to remain transparent, which is a foundation of trust in the staff-patient relationship.
Ethical Implications of Disclosure and Non-Disclosure
The ethical implications of disclosure and non-disclosure are clear: to withhold information about a medical error is to act unethically and without the transparency and loyalty owed to both the patient and the members of the staff. Non-disclosure undermines the core principles that guide nursing practice and erodes the trust that patients place in their care providers. Owning up to mistakes is part of professional life, and avoiding disclosure only complicates matters when admitting the error can bring it to the fore where it can be resolved.
Legal Considerations and Kentucky Law
The legal implications of disclosure versus non-disclosure are equally clear. The severity of the error is what is most likely to affect the outcome if the error becomes known and no initial disclosure was made. However, legal action is also less likely to be pursued when disclosure is immediate and the severity of the error is not significant (Edwin, 2010). Kentucky law states that each case shall be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, implying some gray area regarding what will be tolerated in terms of disclosure policy, as individual hospitals set their own disclosure policies (Kentucky Revised Statutes, n.d.). This approach reflects the broader legal landscape surrounding medical errors, in which context and severity both play important roles in determining consequences.
References
Anderson, P. (2010). Medication errors: Don't let them happen to you. American Nurse Today, 5(3).
Edwin, A. K. (2010). Non-disclosure of medical errors an egregious violation of ethical principles. Ghana Medical Journal, 43(1): 34–39.
Kentucky Revised Statutes. (n.d.). Kentucky Board of Nursing. Retrieved from
Philipsen, N. C., & Soeken, D. (2011). Preparing to blow the whistle: A survival guide for nurses. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 7(9): 740–746.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.