This paper analyzes and compares two medieval sculptures of the Virgin and Child housed in the medieval art collection at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The first, attributed to Claus de Werve (c. 1380–1439), is a French limestone piece from Poligny, Burgundy, believed to have been a gift to a Franciscan convent. The second, Virgin and Child in Majesty, is a twelfth-century French oak sculpture likely from Auvergne. Through close visual analysis, the paper examines how each work conveys Christian themes of wisdom, protection, modesty, and divine authority, and how the compositional choices — pose, gesture, color, and material — reflect the religious values and social conditions of the medieval period.
Art has always held great importance throughout history. On one hand, art is a means of evolution. On the other hand, it is a highly relevant means of expression and communication. Its purpose has been purely aesthetic, but also pragmatic when it needed to communicate specific messages. Art reflects the values of its creator as well as those of the society in which it was produced.
This paper describes, analyzes, and compares two statues that are part of the Metropolitan Museum of Art's medieval art collection. These statues are Virgin and Child, attributed to Claus de Werve, and Virgin and Child in Majesty. Both are exhibited in the medieval art area on the first floor. They represent iconic, Bible-inspired figures, yet they communicate different ways in which people relate to divinity.
The first statue is French, created in Poligny, Burgundy. The piece is attributed to Claus de Werve, who lived between 1380 and 1439. Its main technical characteristics are limestone, polychromy, and gilding. The sculpture is one of four that the museum acquired from Poligny. It is believed that the piece was a gift made by John the Fearless, Duke of Burgundy, or his wife Margaret of Bavaria to the convent they founded at Poligny — a convent belonging to the Franciscan order of the Poor Clares. The statue is thought to have been located in the area reserved for the nuns, where acts of devotion were to take place.
The statue gives a highly monumental impression. It represents the Virgin Mary holding the baby Jesus in her lap. The baby looks at her with an expression open to more than one interpretation. One of the elements that makes this statue especially significant is the fact that the Christ child is holding an open book, with his right hand resting on one of its pages.
From the gesture, one can deduce that what the child is actually doing is asking the Virgin Mary to explain something — he is looking for an answer. What we have here is a metaphor. The viewer is invited to understand that the human side of Jesus as a child is very strong. He is not omniscient like his divine Father. His knowledge is limited. The manifestation of God as a human being carries with it a limited awareness of the world and a limited knowledge of truth. The message transmitted is that we as humans — as children of the Lord — also have a limited capacity to understand the world around us and to find truth.
The fact that the child turns to his mother to receive the desired answer also speaks to the status of the Virgin Mary. She is the one who holds the answers, or more precisely, she is the one who can teach the child how to find answers on his own. From this perspective she becomes an incarnation of Wisdom. A further interpretation is that humans should look to the Virgin Mary and ask her to share in her wisdom. The transmission of knowledge does not occur through pure revelation; rather, the child is taught how to arrive at truth through his own effort. The mystical dimension of the process remains, nonetheless, very strong.
The body language of the Virgin Mary is protective and reassuring, yet at the same time relaxed. What the viewer is meant to understand is that this is the attitude divinity holds toward her children — that is, toward all people. God will protect his children and teach them the right path to follow. Through God's teachings and protection, humanity will be able to reach wisdom, balance, and happiness.
It is clear that the message the sculpture was intended to transmit was a religious and pious one. One may reasonably assume that the artist was commissioned to produce the piece with full awareness that it would be offered as a gift and that its final home would be a convent. The statue reflects the values of the period in which it was created: divinity is believed to be omniscient and generous, the very source of truth and wisdom, and divine protection serves as a legitimating force.
The sculpture has a dark, warm shade of brown that suggests solemnity. It is not particularly bright, which may also suggest a quality of sadness — an invitation to the mood of piety and solemnity associated with the contemplation of God and with acts of devotion and veneration.
The second sculpture is called Virgin and Child in Majesty. It is dated between 1150 and 1200. The key technical materials are oak, polychromy, gesso, and linen. The piece is French, believed to have been made in Auvergne. Like the former work, it is a Christian statue representing the Virgin Mary and the baby Jesus, and it draws its inspiration from the New Testament.
The attitude of the figures is highly monumental; the statue inspires awe and respect. The Virgin is seated not on an elaborate throne but on a simple chair. The majesty of the piece therefore derives from the very nature of the figures rather than from the richness of material possessions. This constitutes a metaphorical lesson in Christian values: modesty, the primacy of the spirit, and simplicity. The carving is beautiful and gives the piece an almost otherworldly feeling — one that, through its clean outlines, seeks to suggest simplicity and sobriety as further Christian virtues.
"Throne of wisdom iconography and divine truth"
"Similarities and differences between both works"
Medieval art was predominantly religious, and the majority of works were inspired by both the Old and the New Testament. The predilection for religious cult objects reflects the social and economic hardships of the era as well as the central importance that God and divinity held across all areas of life. These two sculptures, though separated by roughly two centuries and different in style, together demonstrate the enduring role that medieval religious art played in shaping and expressing the spiritual values of the communities that created and used them.
You’re 67% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.