This paper examines Alejandro Portes and Alex Stepick's City on the Edge: The Transformation of Miami (1994), focusing on why the authors identify 1980 as a critical turning point for Miami. The paper traces how the Mariel boatlift — triggered by a diplomatic incident at the Peruvian embassy in Havana — brought approximately 125,000 Cuban refugees to Florida, many of them from lower socioeconomic classes, racial minorities, or marginalized groups. It explores how this influx challenged the established Cuban-American community's self-image, altered American public opinion toward Cuban immigrants, and contributed to lasting racial, social, and political tensions within Miami.
The paper demonstrates effective use of a secondary source review format: it summarizes a scholarly book's argument, supports it with evidence drawn directly from the text, and situates that argument within a broader historical context (the Cold War, Cuban political history). This approach models how to engage analytically with a non-fiction academic book rather than simply retelling its narrative.
The paper opens by introducing the book and its central thesis, then moves chronologically through the causes of the boatlift, the community's initial reception, growing hostility based on criminality and sexuality, and finally racial tension and the long-term reputational damage to Cuban Americans. The conclusion acknowledges the complexity of blame. This structure reflects the book's own progression from historical event to sociological consequence.
Portes, Alejandro and Alex Stepick. City on the Edge: The Transformation of Miami. California: University of California Press, 1994.
Alejandro Portes and Alex Stepick describe the Miami of 1980 as a city on the edge — racially and socially. The city's formerly established Cuban community, secure in its sense of American identity, underwent a profound disruption with the influx of new Cuban immigrants to its shores. This demographic upheaval was comparable in scale to the earlier exodus of the late 1950s and early 1960s, when the first wave of Cuban immigrants arrived in Florida. Many of the later 1980 immigrants, however, rather than coming from the aristocratic and middle classes of Cuba — like the largely light-skinned supporters of the Batista regime — were from the lower classes, or were mulattoes or Black. This confronted the established Cuban-American community with the uncomfortable truth of the racial and social diversity of the Cuban people and nation.
Why did the Castro regime change its immigration policy so suddenly? Answering this question helps explain why the next wave of immigration was so demographically diverse. The chain of events began, oddly enough, with an incident in which a Havana bus driver crashed through the gates of the Peruvian embassy and publicly embarrassed Castro by demanding political asylum. This set off an international crisis. In 1980, the world was at the height of the second wave of the Cold War, in a state of international tension unprecedented since the Cuban Missile Crisis. Castro sensed the political pressure, and within days of the widely publicized incident he allowed thousands of Cubans to leave, as more and more disenchanted citizens stormed the Cuban embassy to claim refuge.
The embarrassed Castro regime thus opened the port of Mariel to all Cubans who wished to leave. Naturally, most headed to the largest Cuban community in the most prosperous nation in the world: Miami.
Many of the Cuban exiles had relatives already living in Florida. According to Portes and Stepick, the so-called Freedom Flotilla ferried approximately 125,000 Cubans to Florida — a huge number for a relatively small community to absorb at one time. Because many of the new arrivals were family members, however, the anti-Castro, anti-communist Cuban-Americans of Miami felt compelled to respond with open arms, drawing on the Latin spirit of hospitality and communal solidarity.
Yet before long, the community's reaction grew more complicated. A Cuban-American official quoted in the book stated that the Mariel boatlift "destroyed the image of Cubans in the United States and, in passing, destroyed the image of Miami itself for tourism" (21). First quietly, and then openly, longtime Cuban residents of Miami claimed that Castro had used the boatlift as an opportunity to rid Cuba of criminals and vagabonds. Indeed, over half of the boatlift population reportedly had criminal backgrounds. Castro himself reinforced this characterization, publicly denouncing the departing citizens at a May Day celebration in 1980 — during the height of the Mariel migration — calling them the scum of the country and suggesting no other nation, not even America, would want them.
You’re 53% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.