Essay Undergraduate 503 words

Sexism and Feminism in Muriel Rukeyser's "Myth"

~3 min read
Abstract

This paper analyzes Muriel Rukeyser's poem "Myth" as a feminist reinterpretation of Sophocles' Oedipus the King. The paper examines how Rukeyser uses the continuation of Oedipus' story — his encounter with the Sphinx after blinding himself — to expose the sexism embedded in the original myth. Key themes include the treatment of women as commodities, the symbolic significance of the Sphinx's riddle, and the argument that Oedipus' failure to distinguish "Man" from "Woman" represents a deeper social blindness. The paper concludes that Rukeyser's poem remains contemporary in its critique of female subordination and sexism.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand

What makes this paper effective

  • The paper connects a short contemporary poem directly to its classical source text, demonstrating how Rukeyser reframes a well-known myth to deliver a feminist critique.
  • It identifies a specific textual moment — the Sphinx's retort "That's what you think" — and unpacks its thematic significance rather than simply summarizing the plot.
  • The argument moves logically from the treatment of Jocasta in Sophocles to Rukeyser's commentary on female identity, giving the analysis a clear through-line.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates intertextual analysis — reading one literary work through the lens of another. By situating Rukeyser's "Myth" against Sophocles' tragedy, the author shows how meaning is created not just within a text but between texts, revealing how modern writers can use classical material to comment on contemporary social issues such as sexism and gender inequality.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with a brief introduction to both texts and states its central claim. It then examines how Jocasta is portrayed as a commodity in the original play, before turning to Rukeyser's feminist revision. The Sphinx's riddle serves as the analytical centerpiece, illustrating Oedipus' symbolic blindness to women's identity. The paper closes by affirming the poem's contemporary relevance to feminism and the history of female subordination.

Introduction

"Myth" by Muriel Rukeyser is a poem that addresses the issue of sexism embedded in Sophocles' Oedipus the King. The poem begins as a continuation of Oedipus' suffering as a blind man — a condition he brought upon himself after learning that he had killed his father Laius and married his mother Jocasta. Rukeyser uses Oedipus' story as a vehicle for emphasizing the treatment of women in ancient society: as objects of possession, or as commodities to be exchanged.

Jocasta as Commodity in Sophocles' Play

In Sophocles' famous play, Oedipus' mother Jocasta is clearly portrayed as a woman who has been "handed down" — passed to Oedipus following her husband's death. Oedipus' triumph in Thebes made him the ruler of that kingdom, and Jocasta became his wife as a "reward" for conquering the city. It is precisely this reduction of a woman to a prize that Rukeyser calls into question. As the poem reveals, what followed Oedipus' ascension to kingship and his marriage to Jocasta became his ultimate downfall.

Rukeyser's Feminist Reinterpretation

Rukeyser identifies one critical mistake on Oedipus' part in the tragedy that befell him at Thebes: he underestimated the woman who would prove central to his ruin — Jocasta, his own mother. By framing her poem as a sequel to the Sophoclean narrative, Rukeyser makes readers recognize that the "Woman" played the most important and critical role in Oedipus' tragic life. Oedipus blinded himself not only because he killed his own father, but most importantly, because he had made his mother occupy the role of his wife. Rukeyser's treatment of the poem as a derivation of Sophocles' famous play shows how female subordination and sexism were prevalent issues even in antiquity.

1 Locked Section · 110 words remaining
Sign up to read this section

The Sphinx's Riddle and Oedipus' Error · 110 words

"Sphinx corrects Oedipus' conflation of Man and Woman"

Conclusion

Muriel Rukeyser's "Myth" is contemporary in its theme because it tackles the social issues of feminism and sexism, two concerns that remain central to modern society. The poem demonstrates that the problem of sexism and female subordination is not a modern invention but a deeply rooted historical condition. Rukeyser's reinterpretation of the Oedipus myth gives that ancient story renewed urgency, reminding readers that the failure to recognize women as individuals — rather than as commodities or extensions of male identity — carries consequences as devastating today as they were in the world of Greek tragedy.

You’re 72% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Key Concepts in This Paper
Feminist Critique Intertextuality Female Subordination Oedipus Myth The Sphinx Jocasta Sexism Greek Tragedy Gender Identity Commodity of Women
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Sexism and Feminism in Muriel Rukeyser's "Myth". PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/muriel-rukeyser-myth-poem-sexism-feminism-134945

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.