Other Undergraduate 1,419 words

Non-Pharmacological Cancer Pain Management: Web Resources

~8 min read
Abstract

This paper presents a nursing internet resource assessment focused on non-pharmacological pain management for a palliative care patient with cancer. A caregiver has requested information on complementary techniques—including massage, acupressure, acupuncture, and guided imagery—to supplement pharmacological treatment and prepare for breakthrough or intractable pain. Three websites are evaluated for accuracy, credentials, currency, and usability. The paper identifies the most appropriate resource for the patient's learning needs and readiness, aligns website content with evidence from nursing textbooks and evidence-based practice literature, and concludes with open-ended questions designed to assess patient comprehension and promote compliance with a holistic pain management plan.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand

What makes this paper effective

  • The paper grounds its website evaluation in the patient's specific clinical context—palliative care, limited mobility, and a caregiver's involvement—making the assessment practically relevant rather than abstract.
  • Each website is assessed across multiple consistent criteria (credentials, currency, usability, and alignment with evidence-based practice), demonstrating systematic evaluative thinking.
  • The inclusion of open-ended questions at the end shows integration of patient education theory, reflecting understanding of how to assess comprehension and promote compliance.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates comparative evaluation of health information sources against established nursing standards. By cross-referencing website content with Smeltzer and Bare's nursing textbook and Levin and Feldman's evidence-based practice guide, the writer models how clinicians should validate internet resources before recommending them to patients—a core skill in health literacy and patient education.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with a patient scenario and learning need, then states a clear learning objective. It moves into a three-site comparative evaluation covering credentials, currency, and usability, before justifying a single recommended resource. It closes with open-ended patient questions that operationalize the educational plan. This structure mirrors a clinical nursing workflow from assessment through intervention.

Patient Scenario and Learning Need

The chosen topic for this internet information assessment is pain management. The patient scenario is as follows: a patient's caregiver has expressed the desire to learn about non-pharmacological treatments for her mother's cancer pain in a palliative care setting. The daughter would like to be prepared if breakthrough pain occurs during the use of pharmacological means, and to help her mother learn skills she could use to combat intractable pain before such pain occurs.

The patient, though interested, is reluctant to believe that alternative treatments might work as well as, or in supplement to, pain medication, but is willing to review evidence provided by the nurse in connection with her daughter's request. On more than one occasion, the patient has expressed the desire to spend quality time with her children and other family members while she is ill, rather than feeling as though she is "out of her mind" on medication or in severe pain. This tells me, as the nurse, that the patient would likely be interested in and compliant with a non-pharmacological or supplemental program to avoid taking additional pain medication if she does not have to.

The patient and her daughter would like to know whether massage, acupressure, acupuncture (if available in the home), limited movement techniques, and guided imagery or other psychological means would be effective components of a pain management plan (Smeltzer & Bare, 2008, pp. 105–108).

The patient and her caregiver would then possibly apply any techniques the nurse offered as viable through web-based learning, if such resources provided truthful options. The techniques most likely to be included in an alternative pain management plan would include massage, acupressure, acupuncture, and guided imagery. Some of these techniques are supported by nursing intervention materials, specifically psychological techniques such as guided imagery and the relaxation response (Smeltzer & Bare, 2008, pp. 105–108). The patient's learning preference is one of trial and error through application and practice. She is not currently bed-bound but would like to be prepared for when she reaches that state. Both the patient and her daughter have high levels of reading skill and both have access to and regularly use the internet.

The learning objective for the patient is exposure to non-pharmacological pain management techniques that will be possible to apply when she is bed-bound or has limited mobility, but that can be tried now in order to develop an alternative pain management plan to supplement medication. The desired outcome is to have an alternative pain management plan in place prior to the patient's condition declining to a bed-bound state and prior to any additional decrease in mobility.

The three websites chosen for this exploration are:

Learning Objective

Website 1: Alternative Medicine Foundation — Pain Management: An Alternative and Complementary Medicine Resource Guide (http://www.amfoundation.org/pain.htm)

Website 2: Cancer Treatment Centers of America — Pain Management (http://www.cancercenter.com/complementary-alternative-medicine/pain-management.cfm)

Website Evaluation: Accuracy and Credentials

Website 3: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association — Nonpharmacologic and Complementary Approaches to Cancer Pain Management by Lynette A. Menefee, PhD, and Daniel A. Monti, MD (http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/content/full/105/suppl5/S15)

Website 1 has limited credentials, as it is non-authored and associated with the foundation itself. It does, however, offer an extensive resources list for alternative and medical pain management.

Website 2 is also non-authored but offers the advice and testimony of a certified pain management RN and the director of the Cancer Treatment Centers of America's pain management program.

Website 3 is authored by two experts in pain management and integrative pain therapies: Lynette A. Menefee, PhD, from the Jefferson Pain Center, Department of Anesthesiology, and Daniel A. Monti, MD, from the Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior — both at Jefferson Medical College in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Dr. Monti is director of the Jefferson Myrna Brind Center of Integrative Medicine.

3 Locked Sections · 615 words remaining
Sign up to read these 3 sections

Currency and Ease of Use · 110 words

"Update dates and usability compared across sites"

Website Selection and Rationale · 420 words

"Best site chosen and justified against nursing evidence"

Open-Ended Assessment Questions · 85 words

"Questions to gauge patient understanding and readiness"

You’re 44% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Key Concepts in This Paper
Palliative Care Cancer Pain Complementary Therapy Guided Imagery Patient Education Health Literacy Evidence-Based Practice Holistic Nursing Acupressure Breakthrough Pain
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Non-Pharmacological Cancer Pain Management: Web Resources. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/non-pharmacological-cancer-pain-management-web-resources-23595

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.