This reflection paper presents a nurse leader's self-assessment of competencies across three core leadership domains: The Science (Managing the Business), The Art (Leading the People), and The Leader Within. Drawing on a structured scoring framework, the author evaluates strengths and weaknesses in areas such as financial management, human resource leadership, diversity, and personal accountability. The paper also compares self-ratings with mentor feedback, revealing key gaps in staff selection and performance management. To address these gaps, the author develops two SMART goals targeting employee recruitment training and staff termination procedures, each with specific timelines and measurable benchmarks for improvement.
My average score for The Science category is 3.8. The key outcome of this self-assessment process is that I was able to individually gauge my competencies across several areas of focus, including financial management, human resource management, performance improvement, foundational thinking skills, technology, strategic management, and clinical practice knowledge. Some of my most competent areas in this category included the ability to cooperate with other service lines and the ability to match staff competency with patient acuity, both earning a score of 5. The majority of other areas within this category received a score of 4.0, including shared decision-making, patient safety, understanding complex adaptive systems and information technology, facilitating change, project management, and contingency planning.
My lowest score in this category was in staff selection, specifically regarding the application of individual interview approaches. This is an area in which I need to improve in order to understand the most effective techniques for interviewing candidates.
The average score for this category was 4.2. This section encompassed competency rankings across several areas of focus, including human resource leadership skills, relationship management, influencing behaviors, diversity, and shared decision-making. The key benefit of this analysis is that I was able to carefully examine my competencies in leading people and assess how effective I am as a leader. The areas in which I received the highest rankings include my ability to influence others, the promotion of professional development, and managing relationships with key stakeholders. I also demonstrated a strong understanding of cultural components and social justice as they relate to sustaining an environment that supports equality and impartiality. Additionally, I am competent in leveraging individual differences in order to cultivate highly effective work groups.
Other key areas of this category received a score of 4.0. These included performance management — specifically evaluating staff, assisting in setting goals, monitoring personnel for fitness of duty, and carrying out continuous performance development. Other areas receiving a similar score encompassed staff development with respect to facilitating staff education, assessing staff needs, promoting professional growth, and ensuring competency validation. However, this analysis also revealed a significant weakness in my ability to terminate staff, which is an area that requires considerable improvement.
This category placed emphasis on key areas including personal and professional accountability, career planning, personal journey disciplines, and optimizing the leader within. I scored the highest average of the three categories, earning a 4.3 out of 5.0. The areas in which I scored highest in terms of competency included personal growth and development through advancing my education, planning my career, and taking deliberate action. This also encompassed planning a proper career path and engaging in practices that support nursing standards and scopes of practice.
The remaining areas received an average rating of 4.0, reflecting a high overall level of competence in this category. These areas included applying active learning to solve problems and reflecting individually on decisions. Additional competencies included developing a clear career plan that offers direction while remaining flexible enough to adapt to emerging scenarios.
"Mentor scores reveal overestimated competencies and key gaps"
"SMART goals for staff selection and termination training"
You’re 47% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.