This paper examines the operational strengths and weaknesses of Oakley Pub and Grill, an independent casual restaurant. Drawing on interviews with the owner and industry literature, the analysis covers four key areas: cost-control practices, food production and sanitation challenges, essential leadership qualities, and the staffing process. The paper identifies how routine prime cost tracking, improved burger production methods, leadership traits such as humility and integrity, and a structured hiring template could help Oakley overcome its current shortcomings and reclaim its standing as a top local dining destination.
The paper demonstrates applied case analysis: it takes theoretical frameworks (prime cost tracking, staffing best practices, leadership theory) and maps them directly onto observable problems at a specific business. This technique shows the writer's ability to bridge academic concepts and real-world application, a core skill in hospitality and business management courses.
The paper opens with a brief framing of independent versus chain restaurants before moving through four body sections — cost control, food production and sanitation, leadership, and staffing — each identifying a specific problem and proposing a solution. A short conclusion synthesizes the recommendations. This problem-solution structure, repeated consistently across sections, makes the argument easy to follow and reflects standard business analysis writing.
As John R. Walker (2008) describes in The Restaurant: From Concept to Operation, "chain restaurants have some advantages and some disadvantages over independent restaurants" (p. 8). What the chain offers in its favor is public recognition of a name customers can trust, more extensive advertising, and a greater ability to discount. Independent restaurants, on the other hand, also have advantages — they are not bound by any corporate model, they are significantly easier to start up, and they can even grow into chains of their own. This paper examines one independent restaurant, Oakley Pub and Grill, and identifies its strengths and weaknesses across cost control, sanitation, food production, leadership, and staffing.
One cost-control challenge for Oakley is that its food and beverage costs routinely hover around 35%. According to Randy White (2005), costs should not run so high, and one effective way to achieve better control is to perform regular prime cost check-ups: "It is important to track prime cost on a regular basis, as it includes the two most controllable costs — labor and cost of goods sold." Infrequent tracking allows too much time to elapse "before it's recognized that costs may have exceeded the benchmark. There's no way to go back and correct them at that point, so it represents a permanently lost profit opportunity" (White, 2005).
White recommends daily reporting of food and beverage cost, which, among other things, sends a strong message to the food and beverage manager that cost control is essential to the job. As White puts it, "That which gets measured gets attention." If costs are not tracked regularly, they can quickly spiral out of control — a situation that Oakley's owner acknowledges is already occurring.
Oakley, like any restaurant, faces challenges with both food production and sanitation. Initially, the restaurant had a serious problem with roaches — the premises were infested. Pest control resolved the issue; once treatment was applied, roaches fell from the ceiling and covered the floors before the infestation was eliminated. Food production, however, presented a different and more persistent problem.
The difficulty centers on how the hamburger patties are produced. The Oakley burger was once listed among the top five burgers in town. As costs increased, however, cut-backs were made: a cheaper grade of meat was introduced, and more patties were produced at one time. The end result was that the Oakley burger lost much of its appeal.
Addressing this situation requires an understanding of how quality and cost interact. First, switching to lower-grade meat saves Oakley very little in real terms because the operational cost is being ignored — a better burger sells more burgers. Using inferior meat therefore does not solve the underlying cost problem. Second, Oakley should consider making fewer patties at one time. The additives in the meat tend to make it rubbery when it sits too long; a fresh patty is juicy and tender, while Oakley's patties are clearly no longer fresh.
Correcting these issues would not cost Oakley much. The restaurant often runs two cooks on a single shift; reducing that number would save considerably more money than is currently being lost by producing too many patties at once — patties that are made in bulk partly because the extra cook needs to be kept busy. Streamlining both staffing and production would therefore address the quality problem more efficiently.
Mintzberg, H. (1973). The Nature of Managerial Work. Legacee. Retrieved from
Staffing Best Practices. (n.d.). Creating a Staffing System. Retrieved from ].pdf
Walker, J. R. (2008). Study Guide to Accompany The Restaurant: From Concept to Operation (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
White, R. (2005). Prime time: knowing the prime cost formula can keep your restaurant on track. White Hutchinson Leisure and Learning Group. Retrieved from http://www.whitehutchinson.com/leisure/articles/primetime.shtml
You’re 44% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.