Online Data Collection by Advertisers: Privacy & Ethics
This paper examines the ethical and privacy issues associated with online data collection by advertisers. It discusses how firms aggregate digital footprint data to build consumer profiles used for commercial targeting, often circumventing legal protections such as the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The paper draws an analogy between online data harvesting and physical surveillance to argue that such data is inherently private and warrants legislative protection. It also evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of personalized advertising from both consumer and advertiser perspectives, weighing marketing efficiency against risks of discrimination and privacy invasion.
- Introduction to Digital Data Collection: How firms aggregate digital footprints for commercial profiling
- Privacy Concerns and Legal Gaps: Legal loopholes that leave consumer data unprotected
- The Case for Treating Digital Data as Private: Arguments for legislative protection of digital consumer data
- Personalized Advertising: Advantages and Disadvantages: Weighing consumer benefits against discrimination and privacy risks
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses a concrete real-world analogy — comparing online data harvesting to physical surveillance — to make an abstract privacy argument tangible and persuasive.
- Engages both sides of the personalized advertising debate, acknowledging commercial benefits before presenting consumer-side risks.
- Grounds claims in specific legal frameworks (the Fair Credit Reporting Act) to add regulatory context and credibility.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper employs analogical reasoning to bridge a legal gap: because collecting the same data in the physical world would constitute stalking or surveillance, the author argues the digital equivalent should be treated with equal seriousness. This technique strengthens normative claims about privacy by appealing to widely shared intuitions rather than abstract legal definitions alone.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized as two loosely structured responses to related questions. The first section introduces data aggregation and its commercial uses, then pivots to privacy and legal concerns. The second section shifts to a balanced evaluation of personalized advertising. The argument builds progressively, moving from descriptive observations about data collection to normative conclusions about regulation and consumer rights.
Introduction to Digital Data Collection
There is an increased interest in, and use of, information that can be collected from a person's digital footprint. Individually, single pieces of information may not provide great insight into behavior patterns, but when firms are able to collect and aggregate data, they can create detailed profiles used for commercial purposes. This may be seen as reasonable from a commercial perspective, since much of the information collected is not overtly personal — data such as occupation or home value may appear non-intrusive. There is, however, also data collected that is more personal in nature, such as the type and amount of spending on different products, ranging from luxury goods to everyday items like cat food (Singer np). When aggregated, digital footprint information can provide considerable insight into the profile of a potential customer, particularly when compared against an ideal or desired consumer profile for a specific firm or product — including scores that relate directly to financial viability.
Privacy Concerns and Legal Gaps
Agencies such as e-Bureau are able to provide these profiling services precisely because the data they collect is not legally protected (Singer np). Data that may predict financial status, viability, and potential spending is collected and stored in ways that work around the Fair Credit Reporting Act (Singer np). As a result, not only is a large volume of data collected, but consumers do not have the same rights to inspect or correct erroneous information that they would under that Act. If data is not legally protected, the argument goes, it is not private. Yet this reasoning becomes difficult to sustain when one examines concrete analogies.
The Case for Treating Digital Data as Private
If one considers the collection of similar data in the physical world, it could only be gathered by physically following someone — using surveillance equipment, watching their movements, recording their actions, and noting the purchases they make in terms of both type and value. In the physical world, this would constitute an invasion of privacy and could even be classified as stalking. Furthermore, when personal data — which may be inaccurate — is used to identify and target consumers for specific goods or services, there is significant potential for discrimination. When personal data can be used to create consumer classifications that lead to discriminatory outcomes, this further supports the argument that the data is private rather than merely personal.
A final and telling indicator of the private nature of this data is the way that the agencies themselves treat it. They protect not only the data itself, but also the details of what data they are collecting and how they are using it — which suggests even they regard it as private. It can therefore be argued that this is private data that should be protected by legislation rather than left in the hands of potentially unaccountable data agencies.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.