This paper analyzes the key business challenges facing Optical Distortion Inc. (ODI) as it prepares to launch a novel contact lens product designed to reduce aggression and cannibalism among chickens in commercial poultry operations. The paper examines three interconnected problems: determining an optimal pricing strategy for the lenses, managing investment and cost commitments during an early-stage launch, and designing an effective marketing program that communicates the product's benefits to skeptical farmers. Drawing on the original case study, the paper argues that pricing, human resources, and targeted outreach — through trade publications, mobile sales teams, and industry trade shows — are the central levers ODI must manage to secure meaningful market share.
The paper demonstrates applied problem decomposition: rather than treating ODI's situation as a single challenge, the writer disaggregates it into a pricing problem, a costing problem, and a marketing problem, then addresses each in sequence while showing the linkages between them. This structured approach is a core technique in business case analysis and helps readers follow the logic without losing sight of the overall recommendation.
The paper opens with background on the product and its origins, then identifies the company's principal challenges. It moves through pricing, investment, and marketing in turn, proposing specific tactics — trade-publication articles, mobile sales teams, and industry fairs — for each. It closes with a unified recommendation tied to budget sufficiency and first-year priorities, advocating aggressive investment given the product's innovation potential and early investor interest.
Optical Distortion Inc. has developed an idea with the potential to revolutionize animal behavior management in the poultry industry. The company promotes contact lenses designed to partially blind chickens, making them less aggressive and more manageable. Research within the industry has shown that hierarchy disputes inside the chicken pen frequently lead to cannibalism within the flock. The consequences of such behavior are significant and well documented.
Until now, the standard solution was debeaking — a painful and traumatizing procedure in which a chicken's beak is partially removed and the wound cauterized. Debeaking had a direct negative impact on egg production, as chickens tended to eat less in the months following the procedure.
The contact lens concept dates back to 1965, when the original product was first designed and tested. Throughout the 1960s, the product underwent several modifications aimed at improving its performance before receiving a U.S. patent in 1969. In 1973, Optical Distortion Inc. secured a long-term license from New World for the use of hydrophilic polymer in nonhuman applications and was ready to bring its invention to market. Several significant business challenges arise from this situation, and they are closely connected to the difficulties any company in its early stages of development must navigate — most notably, limited financial and human resources and the need to make sound decisions about investment levels and general spending on areas such as advertising.
The first issue the company faces is cost and revenue related. On the revenue side, stakeholders must decide how much to charge for the contact lenses. The minimum price currently under consideration is $0.08 per pair, or approximately $20 per box of 250 pairs. Stakeholders must also weigh the benefits that farmers gain from using contact lenses. As the case study makes clear, switching from debeaking to contact lenses produces savings on feed costs while simultaneously increasing overall revenues through higher egg production. Viewed in this light, it is reasonable to assume that the economic value the lenses deliver to farmers will substantially exceed the purchase price.
There is also a psychological dimension to pricing. When selling any product, a very low price can create the impression in the buyer's mind that the item is of inferior quality or limited usefulness. Because both the product and the underlying concept are genuinely new, setting the price too low risks generating exactly this reaction and undermining the launch.
Reading the case, one of the most persuasive marketing arguments available is the following: for every dollar spent on contact lenses, a farmer stands to gain at least twice as much from savings on chicken feed and increased egg production. These benefits must be communicated clearly, however, because without explanation the initial reaction from farmers is likely to be skepticism — contact lenses for chickens is, after all, an unfamiliar concept. The pricing problem is therefore inseparable from the communication challenge: how much to charge for a revolutionary product, and how to justify that price to a cautious audience.
These two problems — what to charge and how much to spend — are not independent. A higher marketing and sales budget allows the company to build awareness and justify a premium price; a constrained budget forces a more targeted rollout. Resolving this tension requires a clear-eyed assessment of available resources and a realistic first-year business plan.
The third major problem is the marketing challenge. The product's two defining characteristics are (1) its revolutionary concept and (2) the tangible benefits it offers to the poultry industry. The company's marketing efforts must keep both of these features front and center.
Several marketing channels are available for effective propagation of the concept. The first is advertising in poultry industry publications. Beyond placing standard advertisements, however, the company should go further and seek to publish editorial articles and research findings that document how contact lenses reduce hierarchical aggression and cannibalism in the flock. Well-placed research articles are likely to generate more genuine interest among farmers than promotional advertising alone, lending the product scientific credibility.
The company could also deploy a mobile sales workforce — teams that visit farms directly to explain the product's advantages and, where possible, complete sales on the spot. Each mobile team could be assigned to one of the regional offices the company intends to establish, enabling coordinated, geographically focused outreach.
Participation in national fairs and industry trade shows is equally important. These events are the natural gathering places where farmers learn about new technologies and products. A visible presence at trade shows could establish Optical Distortion Inc. as a recognized and credible player in the poultry sector.
Beyond identifying advertising channels, the marketing strategy must also include coherent market segmentation. The company needs to determine which market segments to target first, both geographically and in terms of customer psychology. The ideal early adopter is a farmer who is open to change and willing to embrace new ideas — someone predisposed to believe that an innovative product can improve productivity and increase revenues.
You’re 69% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.