Organisational Values, Culture, and Strategic Alignment
This paper examines the relationship between organisational values, culture, and strategic objectives, with particular attention to the non-profit sector. Drawing on management literature, it defines organisational values and culture, explores how leadership drives value formation, and investigates the concept of value congruence as a moderator of organisational outcomes. The paper also considers the role of ethics in reinforcing shared values and addresses how organisational change complicates the alignment between values, culture, and goals. The analysis highlights that while the literature clearly links values to culture and objectives, the nature of this relationship remains underexplored, especially in non-profit contexts where volunteer participation and mission-driven work create distinctive dynamics.
- Introduction: Framing values, culture, and the research gap
- Defining Values and Culture: Distinguishing organisational values from culture
- The Role of Leadership: CEO influence on values and strategic direction
- Relationship with Strategic Objectives: Value congruence as driver of goal attainment
- Values and Ethics: Ethics codes reinforcing shared organisational values
- The Influencing Role of Organisational Change: How change disrupts values-culture-objectives alignment
- Summary: Key findings and leadership as unifying theme
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Clearly scoped argument: the paper identifies a genuine gap in the literature — the underexplored relationship between values, culture, and objectives in non-profit settings — and uses this gap to frame the entire discussion.
- Consistent use of value congruence as a unifying concept, weaving it through sections on culture, leadership, ethics, and change to build a coherent analytical thread.
- Balanced treatment of theory and application: abstract constructs (e.g., Hofstede's distinction between values and culture) are grounded with practical implications, such as hiring for value congruence.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective synthesis of disparate sources around a single organising concept. Rather than summarising each source in isolation, the author connects Quinn and Rohrbaugh's competing values framework, Berson et al.'s CEO values research, and Posner's congruence findings into a cumulative argument. This integrative approach is the hallmark of a strong literature-based essay.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing introduction that states the gap. Subsequent sections build logically: first defining key terms, then introducing leadership as a driver of values, then connecting values to strategic objectives, then extending the analysis to ethics, and finally addressing the complicating factor of organisational change. The summary consolidates the argument without introducing new content. The structure is clear, progressive, and well-signposted.
Introduction
Every organisation should have a set of underpinning values, and this is especially true of non-profit organisations, which exist for reasons other than earning profit. The values are typically embedded not only in the strategic objectives that leadership sets for the organisation but also in the methods by which the organisation seeks to attain those objectives. The values set the cultural tone for the organisation, and the culture influences organisational actions and outcomes. The amount of study on this subject, however, has been minimal in management literature. This paper examines the relationship between organisational culture, organisational values, and organisational strategic objectives, with an emphasis on the non-profit sector. The values that underpin an organisation should be reflected both in its culture and its objectives, but the nature of this relationship remains relatively unexplored — and that is the gap the present paper seeks to fill.
Defining Values and Culture
Organisational values are defined as the shared values of the people within an organisation, operating within that organisation's specific context. In many organisations there are competing values, and the organisation must find ways to manage any dilemmas that arise from these multiple competing values (Quinn & Rohrbaugh, 1983). An organisation will have values that govern its internal communications, its external communications, its strategic objectives, and how it resolves conflicts (Neal, 2013). Value dimensions affect a number of cultural characteristics, such as risk-taking, communication style, adaptability, innovation, internal power dynamics, and goal-setting (Colley, Lincolne & Neal, 2013).
It is also necessary to understand the difference between organisational culture and values. The culture is essentially the outward manifestation of values. Culture can therefore be found in the policies, procedures, and other organisational practices, which reflect the underlying values. Those values are often organisation-wide rather than relating to individual employees. Individual employees may hold values that differ from those of the organisation as a whole, but it is only the latter that shapes organisational culture (Hofstede, 1998). The strategic objectives set by an organisation's leadership are another matter entirely.
While it is typically assumed that organisational culture affects outcomes and that there is a relationship between values and outcomes, the nature of this relationship has not received much study and remains unclear. There is some support for the idea that organisational values should be congruent with the overall organisational culture, and that when they are, this will have a positive moderating effect on organisational outcomes (Gregory et al., 2009). It is therefore reasonable that an organisation should hire for value congruence. At non-profits, some people are volunteers who self-select, which raises questions about staffing practices and how those practices can affect the values–culture–objectives relationship.
The Role of Leadership
Leadership is often a key driver of organisational values. The CEO holds both formal and informal power within the organisation and sets its strategy. That strategy will often reflect the values of the CEO (Berson, Oreg & Dvir, 2008), which raises the question of whether the relationship between values in an organisation and its strategic objectives is bi-directional. CEO values will frequently influence organisational culture, and there is a subsequent relationship between organisational culture and organisational outcomes. What this indicates is that organisational values are constantly shifting. While they influence organisational objectives, they are also subject to change — implying that there may well be a relationship between changes to the organisational value system, organisational culture, and organisational objectives.
References
Berson, Y., Oreg, S. & Dvir, T. (2008). CEO values, organisational culture and firm outcomes. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 29(5), 615–633.
Boxx, W., Odom, R. & Dunn, M. (1991). Organisational values and value congruency and their impact on satisfaction, commitment, and cohesion: An empirical examination within the public sector. Public Personnel Management, 20(2), 195–205.
Colley, S., Lincolne, J. & Neal, A. (2013). An examination of the relationship amongst profiles of perceived organisational values, safety climate and safety outcomes. Safety Science, 51, 69–76.
Gregory, B., Harris, S., Armenakis, A. & Shook, C. (2009). Organisational culture and effectiveness: A study of values, attitudes and organisational outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 62, 673–679.
Grojean, M., Resick, C., Dickson, M. & Smith, B. (2004). Leaders, values and organisational climate: Examining leadership strategies for establishing an organisational climate regarding ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(3), 223–241.
Hofstede, G. (1998). Attitudes, values and organisational culture: Disentangling the concepts. Organisation Studies, 19(3), 477–493.
Kotter, J. (2007). Our iceberg is melting. Retrieved July 26, 2015, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh2xc6vXQgk
Posner, B. (2010). Another look at the impact of personal and organisational values congruency. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(4), 535–541.
Quinn, R. & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organisational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363–377.
Valentine, S. & Barnett, T. (2003). Ethics code awareness, perceived ethical values and organisational commitment. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 23(4), 359–367.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.