OSINT and Big Data Challenges in U.S. Intelligence
This paper examines the role of Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) in the modern U.S. intelligence community, focusing on three core challenges: the lack of a systematized, community-wide approach to OSINT collection; the legal and procedural difficulties of accessing private social media data; and the overwhelming volume of Big Data that must be efficiently processed. Drawing on scholarship by Lim, Lowenthal, Clark, Best, and Zegart, the paper proposes pairing OSINT with HUMINT for social media operations, developing shared collection protocols across agencies, and recruiting IT professionals to improve data processing. It evaluates the pros and cons of each proposed solution and concludes with a recommended path forward for strengthening OSINT's contribution to strategic intelligence.
- Introduction: OSINT's role in the Big Data intelligence era
- Background and Core Problems: Three key OSINT operational and legal challenges
- Proposed Solutions: Three remedies pairing OSINT, HUMINT, and IT
- Pros of the Proposed Solutions: Benefits of collaboration, access, and data processing
- Cons of the Proposed Solutions: Feasibility limits and role confusion concerns
- Conclusion and Optimal Path Forward: Recommended integrated OSINT-HUMINT strategy
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper uses a clear, structured problem-solution format — background, solution, pros, cons, conclusion — that makes the argument easy to follow and evaluate.
- It grounds abstract policy claims in concrete examples, such as the Facebook "friends only" privacy scenario, which illustrates the legal boundary between OSINT and HUMINT.
- By acknowledging the cons of each proposed solution rather than dismissing them, the paper demonstrates analytical balance and intellectual honesty.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates the use of a pros/cons analytical framework applied to policy solutions — a technique common in intelligence studies and public policy writing. Rather than simply advocating for a solution, the author systematically weighs feasibility against benefit, drawing on named scholars (Lim, Lowenthal, Zegart) to support both the problem diagnosis and the solution critique. This approach models how practitioners evaluate competing options under conditions of uncertainty.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an introduction contextualizing OSINT within the Big Data era, followed by a background section identifying three specific operational problems. A brief solutions section presents three corresponding remedies, which are then evaluated separately in dedicated pros and cons sections. The paper closes with a short conclusion synthesizing the optimal path forward. This six-part structure mirrors a policy brief or issue memo format, making it useful as a model for applied intelligence or national security writing assignments.
Introduction
Big Data is driving virtually every industry in today's Digital Age, including the work of the intelligence community. From human intelligence (HUMINT) to open source intelligence (OSINT), "strategic intelligence as a professional discipline and force multiplier" has evolved from centering on "qualitative subject-matter content analyzed by human specialists" to leveraging "the increasingly massive collection and machine analysis of quantifiable, if not necessarily quantitative, data."1
However, as Richard Best, Specialist in National Defense in the Foreign Affairs, Defense and Trade Division, testified before Congress in 2006, OSINT — which is primarily derived from old and new media publications, including social media — lacks a systematic manner in which such data can be incorporated into or used to supplement classified information.2 As Best notes, "a consensus now exists that OSINT must be systematically collected and should constitute an essential component of analytical products."3
The main challenge is that the intelligence community itself has not yet adopted a systematic approach, and the Director of National Intelligence has not taken sufficient steps to exploit OSINT to its maximum potential. How to better incorporate OSINT into strategic decision-making within the intelligence community is a major issue that must be examined more closely, so that U.S. intelligence can be better fortified by making the utmost use of all available information.
Background and Core Problems
While OSINT and HUMINT are recognized as the "most democratic intelligence disciplines,"4 they are also the most common. The fact that virtually every intelligence agency collects OSINT means that one of the major problems surrounding it is tied to "duplicative efforts, wasted resources, and often budget competition that promoted information hoarding rather than information sharing."5
There is also a second challenge with respect to OSINT. Because OSINT is the source of first resort — given how readily and broadly available it is — it has a long history in intelligence gathering. The collection of this data, however, must be legal and lawful. With so much data now being posted and shared via social media, a gray line exists as to whether such information is public or private, and whether intelligence agencies should have lawful access to social media platforms for the purposes of collecting OSINT.6
Since the War on Terror, terror cells have used social media to relay information via the Internet to members around the world, and their ability to organize is viewed as one of their greatest strengths.7 In an effort to more effectively monitor such organized networks, intelligence agencies need to be able to observe what information is being exchanged via social media. Yet, as Lowenthal and Clark note, this is an issue because if a profile is set to "Private," it cannot be accessed under the normal procedures of OSINT:
"For example, an individual's Facebook profile can be considered publicly available if it is wide open. However, should the individual choose to restrict their profile to 'friends only,' then the profile is no longer publicly available. Any actions then to obtain access, such as sending the individual a friend request or attempting to hack their Facebook account, falls outside the scope of OSINT."8
Thus the two main challenges related to OSINT are: (1) the need for a systematized approach through which the various intelligence agencies can collaboratively collect and share OSINT; and (2) the need for the intelligence community to combine OSINT with HUMINT with respect to "friending" individuals on social media so as to access private information — or else finding a legal means of procuring data from a private profile in a timely and systematized manner.
A third problem also exists: the sheer scope and size of data available that must be processed through OSINT. The arrival of Big Data has presented its own unique challenges, which are as much related to information technology systems as they are to data collection and intelligence.
Proposed Solutions
The proposed solutions to these challenges are: (1) a systematized method should be developed and implemented by the intelligence community with regard to collecting OSINT; (2) OSINT operations should be paired with HUMINT operations in order to navigate the social media landscape; and (3) OSINT officers should work alongside IT personnel to develop and implement an effective method for screening and processing Big Data.
Conclusion and Optimal Path Forward
The best solution going forward is to combine OSINT with HUMINT when searching social media for information, and to develop an approach to OSINT that the intelligence community as a whole can agree to share. IT developers should also be engaged to help devise better methods of processing Big Data so as to facilitate OSINT collection. While each of these steps presents its own implementation challenges, together they represent the most comprehensive and realistic path toward maximizing OSINT's contribution to U.S. strategic intelligence.
References
Best, Richard. Open Source Intelligence (OSINT): Issues for Congress. Washington, DC, 2007.
Lim, Kevjn. "Big data and strategic intelligence." Intelligence and National Security 31, no. 4 (2016): 619–635.
Lowenthal, Mark M., and Robert M. Clark, eds. The Five Disciplines of Intelligence Collection. Sage, 2015.
Zegart, Amy B. "September 11 and the adaptation failure of US intelligence agencies." International Security 29, no. 4 (2005): 78–111.
Zegart, Amy, and Stephen D. Krasner, eds. "Pragmatic Engagement amidst Global Uncertainty: Three Major Challenges." Hoover Institution, 2015.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.