Outsourcing and International Human Resource Management
This paper examines the implications of outsourcing as a flexibility strategy for international human resource management (HRM). Beginning with an overview of outsourcing as a business strategy — including its drivers in globalization and competitive pressure — the paper then explores how outsourcing reshapes HRM practices on both the vendor and client sides. Key implications discussed include the global shortage of skilled HR personnel, high employee turnover in the business process outsourcing sector, the high rate of failed client–vendor partnerships, and the growing trend of outsourcing HR functions themselves. The paper concludes by addressing the disadvantages of outsourcing for HRM, such as loss of control, confidentiality risks, contract management burdens, and the social stigma of offshoring jobs.
- Introduction: Overview of globalization, HRM, and outsourcing scope
- Outsourcing as a Business Strategy: Definition, drivers, and business case for outsourcing
- Implications for International Human Resource Management: Broad HRM impacts of outsourcing across industries
- HR Challenges on the Vendor Side: Turnover, costs, broken contracts, and micro challenges
- Negative Implications of Outsourcing for HR Flexibility: Control loss, confidentiality, contracts, and morale risks
- Conclusion: Summary of HRM implications and outsourcing tradeoffs
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper maintains a clear, logical progression — moving from definitional overview, to macro and micro implications, to specific disadvantages — making the argument easy to follow.
- It draws on a range of peer-reviewed sources spanning multiple years, demonstrating awareness of how outsourcing trends evolved over time.
- The distinction between macro-level (government/policy) and micro-level (firm-level) HR challenges shows analytical depth and structural clarity.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses a problem-decomposition technique: it breaks a broad topic (outsourcing and HRM) into discrete, labeled sub-issues — macro vs. micro challenges, vendor vs. client perspectives, advantages vs. disadvantages — and addresses each with specific cited evidence. This layered structure helps the reader understand a complex, multifaceted issue without losing the thread of the argument.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing introduction that previews the paper's three-part structure. It then delivers a factual and statistical overview of outsourcing as a business strategy. The central section addresses international HRM implications across vendor relationships, contract failures, and HR function outsourcing. A dedicated section on disadvantages — covering control loss, confidentiality, contract risk, and employee morale — rounds out the analysis before a brief synthesizing conclusion.
Introduction
The continued trend toward increased globalization is facilitated, in part, by the need for organizations to remain competitive and to increase their market share. With this trend comes a variety of considerations regarding the development and implementation of human resource policies, in an effort to remain competitive in an increasingly demanding marketplace. One strategy human resources (HR) utilizes to enhance flexibility in today's business environment is outsourcing. According to Fitz-enz (2009), outsourcing has been the first true structural change to human resource management. This has several implications for the international management of human resources.
To understand this topic further, this paper provides an overview of outsourcing as a business strategy, followed by a discussion of the implications for international human resource management. The specific disadvantages of outsourcing in relation to human resource management are then examined.
Outsourcing as a Business Strategy
Back in 1997, Haines noted that as the developed economies of North America, Europe, and Asia transitioned from manufacturing industrial products to information-based and technology services, two trends could significantly and negatively impact those economies. The first was the emerging shortage of knowledge workers needed to produce intellectual property. The second was the shortening of product development and life cycles, which would result in a paradigm shift for workers. As a result of these business environment changes, many organizations looked to outsourcing as a means of garnering a competitive advantage in an increasingly competitive world.
As Haines (1997) notes, "Simply stated, outsourcing means to hire an external provider to perform an activity that normally would be performed by employees of the business" (p. 12). It "is one of several human capital strategies for obtaining labor outside the traditional definition of employment" (Fisher, Wasserman, Wolf, & Wears, 2008). Organizations can utilize this strategy to increase focus on their core competencies, thereby eliminating activities that do not contribute to the value chain of the organization. Research by Personnel Today found that HR staff spend up to 85 percent of their time managing administrative processes, while only 15 percent is spent on strategic activities. "In best practice companies, these percentages would typically be reversed" ("Transforming HR," 2005, p. 38).
Each function or business activity is evaluated regarding its contribution to the organization. Activities that are farther from the organization's core competency are more likely to be outsourced, freeing employees to support the core competency of the organization. Once activities have been selected for outsourcing, clear and practical policies must be established on how to outsource. Vendor selection, contract development, and management of outsourced relationships all have to be carefully defined (Haines, 1997).
Outsourcing gives companies the flexibility they need to meet the demands of increasing pressures and complexity in today's business environment. Organizations can often improve their product quality while improving process efficiency and profitability through outsourcing. Marinaccio (1994) cited a survey of 392 CEOs identified as leading the fastest-growing businesses in America. Sixty-five percent of these businesses were outsourcing, and 78 percent considered outsourcing to be an important factor in their company's growth. These firms used outsourcing to encourage vigorous growth while planning more capital for investment, compared to firms that did not outsource.
In North American firms, Klaas (2008) states that 87 percent of American firms reported relying on outsourcing of human resource functions specifically. This decision is driven by an effort to reduce total transaction costs. Organizations look not only at the immediate costs of obtaining a service or good, but also at the costs associated with managing contractual relationships, monitoring performance, and managing a contingent workforce. In 2006–2007, the outsourcing sector was valued at $47.8 billion, and by 2012 it was anticipated to grow to $150 billion (Ranganathan & Kuruvilla, 2008).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.