Outsourcing and International Human Resource Management
This paper examines the implications of outsourcing as a flexibility strategy for international human resource management (HRM). Beginning with an overview of outsourcing as a business strategy — including its drivers in globalization and competitive pressure — the paper then explores how outsourcing reshapes HRM practices on both the vendor and client sides. Key implications discussed include the global shortage of skilled HR personnel, high employee turnover in the business process outsourcing sector, the high rate of failed client–vendor partnerships, and the growing trend of outsourcing HR functions themselves. The paper concludes by addressing the disadvantages of outsourcing for HRM, such as loss of control, confidentiality risks, contract management burdens, and the social stigma of offshoring jobs.
- Introduction: Overview of globalization, HRM, and outsourcing scope
- Outsourcing as a Business Strategy: Definition, drivers, and business case for outsourcing
- Implications for International Human Resource Management: Broad HRM impacts of outsourcing across industries
- HR Challenges on the Vendor Side: Turnover, costs, broken contracts, and micro challenges
- Negative Implications of Outsourcing for HR Flexibility: Control loss, confidentiality, contracts, and morale risks
- Conclusion: Summary of HRM implications and outsourcing tradeoffs
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper maintains a clear, logical progression — moving from definitional overview, to macro and micro implications, to specific disadvantages — making the argument easy to follow.
- It draws on a range of peer-reviewed sources spanning multiple years, demonstrating awareness of how outsourcing trends evolved over time.
- The distinction between macro-level (government/policy) and micro-level (firm-level) HR challenges shows analytical depth and structural clarity.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses a problem-decomposition technique: it breaks a broad topic (outsourcing and HRM) into discrete, labeled sub-issues — macro vs. micro challenges, vendor vs. client perspectives, advantages vs. disadvantages — and addresses each with specific cited evidence. This layered structure helps the reader understand a complex, multifaceted issue without losing the thread of the argument.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing introduction that previews the paper's three-part structure. It then delivers a factual and statistical overview of outsourcing as a business strategy. The central section addresses international HRM implications across vendor relationships, contract failures, and HR function outsourcing. A dedicated section on disadvantages — covering control loss, confidentiality, contract risk, and employee morale — rounds out the analysis before a brief synthesizing conclusion.
Introduction
The continued trend toward increased globalization is facilitated, in part, by the need for organizations to remain competitive and to increase their market share. With this trend comes a variety of considerations regarding the development and implementation of human resource policies, in an effort to remain competitive in an increasingly demanding marketplace. One strategy human resources (HR) utilizes to enhance flexibility in today's business environment is outsourcing. According to Fitz-enz (2009), outsourcing has been the first true structural change to human resource management. This has several implications for the international management of human resources.
To understand this topic further, this paper provides an overview of outsourcing as a business strategy, followed by a discussion of the implications for international human resource management. The specific disadvantages of outsourcing in relation to human resource management are then examined.
Outsourcing as a Business Strategy
Back in 1997, Haines noted that as the developed economies of North America, Europe, and Asia transitioned from manufacturing industrial products to information-based and technology services, two trends could significantly and negatively impact those economies. The first was the emerging shortage of knowledge workers needed to produce intellectual property. The second was the shortening of product development and life cycles, which would result in a paradigm shift for workers. As a result of these business environment changes, many organizations looked to outsourcing as a means of garnering a competitive advantage in an increasingly competitive world.
As Haines (1997) notes, "Simply stated, outsourcing means to hire an external provider to perform an activity that normally would be performed by employees of the business" (p. 12). It "is one of several human capital strategies for obtaining labor outside the traditional definition of employment" (Fisher, Wasserman, Wolf, & Wears, 2008). Organizations can utilize this strategy to increase focus on their core competencies, thereby eliminating activities that do not contribute to the value chain of the organization. Research by Personnel Today found that HR staff spend up to 85 percent of their time managing administrative processes, while only 15 percent is spent on strategic activities. "In best practice companies, these percentages would typically be reversed" ("Transforming HR," 2005, p. 38).
Each function or business activity is evaluated regarding its contribution to the organization. Activities that are farther from the organization's core competency are more likely to be outsourced, freeing employees to support the core competency of the organization. Once activities have been selected for outsourcing, clear and practical policies must be established on how to outsource. Vendor selection, contract development, and management of outsourced relationships all have to be carefully defined (Haines, 1997).
Outsourcing gives companies the flexibility they need to meet the demands of increasing pressures and complexity in today's business environment. Organizations can often improve their product quality while improving process efficiency and profitability through outsourcing. Marinaccio (1994) cited a survey of 392 CEOs identified as leading the fastest-growing businesses in America. Sixty-five percent of these businesses were outsourcing, and 78 percent considered outsourcing to be an important factor in their company's growth. These firms used outsourcing to encourage vigorous growth while planning more capital for investment, compared to firms that did not outsource.
In North American firms, Klaas (2008) states that 87 percent of American firms reported relying on outsourcing of human resource functions specifically. This decision is driven by an effort to reduce total transaction costs. Organizations look not only at the immediate costs of obtaining a service or good, but also at the costs associated with managing contractual relationships, monitoring performance, and managing a contingent workforce. In 2006–2007, the outsourcing sector was valued at $47.8 billion, and by 2012 it was anticipated to grow to $150 billion (Ranganathan & Kuruvilla, 2008).
Implications for International Human Resource Management
In the past two decades, according to Fisher, Wasserman, Wolf, and Wears (2008), there has been a dramatic shift toward using outsourced labor. This increase in outsourcing results from organizations needing to reduce labor costs, increase flexibility, and obtain expertise not available internally. Outsourcing occurs across a variety of industries and for a variety of business functions. Both the outsourcing vendor and the client firm must adapt their human resources practices to the organizational changes that occur as a result of outsourcing. According to Klaas (2008), the last decade in particular has seen outsourcing significantly change how human resource management functions in several large North American organizations. This leads to a wide variety of implications for international HRM, given the increased usage of outsourcing as a means of organizational flexibility.
An additional implication for human resources, in response to increased outsourcing, is the increased likelihood that HR functions themselves will be outsourced — alongside the more traditional manufacturing and call center functions with which outsourcing is typically associated. This further increases organizational flexibility. As with any complex set of operations, human resources can be broken down into discrete processes. Benefits, compensation, training, recruiting, and compliance are just some of the functional areas within HR. Although each is essential to the organization, they also consume valuable resources. When these are outsourced — as with other non-core-competency functions — it allows the organization to focus more on its core competencies and other high-value, strategic activities. Klaas (2008) concludes that "while HR activities that are more strategic in nature or have more opportunity to add value typically remain within the firm, large portions of the traditional HR function are now being delivered via outsourcing arrangements" (p. 1500).
Fisher, Wasserman, Wolf, and Wears (2008) identify four factors that human resources must consider with outsourced workers and international HRM. The first is the physical location of outsourced workers — with employees sometimes located half a world away, this presents unique HR challenges. The second factor is the temporal nature of the relationship with outsourcers, particularly when the length of the contract is not clearly defined or is short-term. The third factor is the exclusivity an outsourced worker provides a client; if an outsourcer is working with multiple clients, this adds challenges for HR management. The fourth factor is the voluntariness of the outsourced work itself.
Conclusion
The increased use of outsourcing as a strategy for meeting the opportunities and threats of an increasingly globalized and hyper-competitive world has significant implications for international human resource management, despite the enhanced flexibility it offers the organization. Developing and implementing HR policies and procedures with the challenges of outsourcing relationships in mind adds to the already demanding workload of HR professionals. In addition to these implications, several distinct disadvantages accompany outsourcing for human resource management. Organizations and their HR leaders must carefully weigh these factors when formulating outsourcing strategies in a global context.
Fisher, S., Wasserman, M., Wolf, P., and Wears, K. (Fall 2008). Human resource issues in outsourcing: Integrating research and practice. Human Resource Management, 47(3), 501–523.
Fitz-enz, J. (Winter 2009). Disruptive technology for human resources. Employment Relations Today, 35(4), 1–10.
Haines, L. (4 Aug 1997). Outsourcing human resources pays off handsomely for growing firms. Business Journal Serving Fresno & the Central San Joaquin Valley, 322181, 12–13.
Klaas, B. (Aug 2008). Outsourcing and the HR function: An examination of trends and developments within North American firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(8), 1500–1514.
Kuruvilla, S. & Ranganathan, A. (Oct 2008). Economic development strategies and macro- and micro-level human resource policies. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 62(1), 39–72.
Marinaccio, L. (Mar 1994). Outsourcing: A strategic tool for managing human resources. Employee Benefits Journal, 19(1), 39–42.
Mehta, N. & Mehta, A. (Feb 2010). It takes two to tango: How relational investments improve IT outsourcing partnerships. Communications of the ACM, 53(2), 160–164.
Transforming HR. (2005). London: Thorogood Publishing Ltd.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.