This paper presents a reflective journal review of Lloyd and Craig's 2007 article, "A Guide to Taking a Patient's History," published in Nursing Standard. The review summarizes the article's core components, including environmental preparation, nurse-patient communication, active listening, and the structured history-taking sequence. Particular attention is given to the Calgary-Cambridge consultation framework and its five stages. The reviewer evaluates the article's strengths and limitations, noting its comprehensive coverage of different history types while identifying a gap in guidance for managing uncooperative or withholding patients. The paper concludes with the reviewer's personal assessment of how the article's strategies apply to nursing practice.
Reference: Lloyd, H., & Craig, S. (2007). A guide to taking a patient's history. Nursing Standard, 22(13), 42–48.
Lloyd and Craig's article, "A Guide to Taking a Patient's History," outlines the fundamental components necessary for obtaining a complete, thorough, and effective patient history. The article explores the basic importance of a patient history and addresses key preparatory steps: organizing the environment, establishing communication, gaining consent, and executing the actual history-taking process. It also covers the various types of histories a patient may have, including past medical history, sexual history, medication history, mental health history, and family history, among others.
The article begins by discussing the importance of preparing the environment before taking a history. A properly arranged environment supports the "maintenance of privacy and dignity," which in turn builds patient trust in the nurse (Lloyd & Craig, 2007). Allowing sufficient time for preparation is equally important, as it enables the clinician to gather all the details necessary for future treatment.
Effective nurse-patient communication is another central component. According to the article, "developing a rapport with the patient includes being professionally friendly" and engaging in "active listening" (Lloyd & Craig, 2007). The core history-taking process follows a structured sequence: beginning with introductions, proceeding through a defined order, asking open questions "to ensure that nothing is missed when taking a history from a patient," then moving to closed questions, and finally seeking clarification (Lloyd & Craig, 2007).
A central assessment and strategy tool discussed in the article is the Calgary-Cambridge framework, which structures the history-taking consultation. According to the article, this framework is valuable because it "facilitated continued learning and refining of consultation skills for teachers and practitioners and is an ideal model for both" more and less experienced nurses (Lloyd & Craig, 2007).
The five stages of this consultation framework are: (1) explanation and planning, (2) aiding accurate recall and understanding, (3) achieving a shared understanding, (4) planning through shared decision-making, and (5) closing the consultation (Lloyd & Craig, 2007). The tools, concepts, and ideas discussed throughout the article are presented as applicable to all patient groups, including women, children, adults, and the elderly.
"Strengths, limitations, and real-world gaps"
"Professional takeaways and personal reflections"
You’re 47% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.