Pope Francis' Rhetorical Shift and Public Persuasion Strategy
This paper reviews a New York Times article reporting Pope Francis' notably softer rhetorical approach to Church teachings on homosexuality and abortion. Applying public administration concepts from Milakovich and Gordon, the paper argues that Francis exemplifies effective policy communication by favoring indirect persuasion and "jawboning" over coercive command authority. Without altering official doctrine, Francis reframed the Church's message to emphasize compassion and saving love, thereby widening its appeal to moderate audiences. The analysis draws a broader lesson for public administrators: the presentation of policy matters as much as its content, and persuasive framing targeted at the persuadable middle is often more effective than rigid, condemnatory rhetoric.
- Introduction: Francis and the Church's Changing Tone: Francis shifts tone without changing official Church doctrine
- Persuasion Over Coercion in Public Administration: Indirect persuasion outperforms coercive rhetoric in policy
- Jawboning and the Priority of Saving Love: Jawboning and compassion-first framing as persuasion tools
- Targeting the Moderate Middle: Strategic rhetoric aimed at persuadable moderate audiences
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Applies academic public administration theory (Milakovich & Gordon) concretely to a real-world news event, demonstrating conceptual fluency.
- Draws a clear analogy between religious leadership and public administration, showing the student can transfer frameworks across contexts.
- Maintains a focused, well-paced argument across four short paragraphs without digression.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied theoretical analysis: it takes specific concepts from a public administration textbook — indirect persuasion, jawboning, and command authority — and uses them as an interpretive lens on a current events article. This shows the reader not just what Francis did, but why it matters within a recognized analytical framework.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by summarizing the news article and establishing context for Francis' rhetorical shift. The second paragraph connects this shift to persuasion theory in public administration. The third paragraph introduces the concept of jawboning and quotes Francis directly to anchor the argument. The final paragraph acknowledges the limits of Francis' approach while explaining its strategic logic — targeting the persuadable moderate rather than committed opponents.
Introduction: Francis and the Church's Changing Tone
The New York Times article "Pope Bluntly Faults Church's Focus on Gays and Abortion" recounts what has often been called Pope Francis' refreshing attitude toward Church policy. Although Francis has not changed the Church's official positions — the Church does not condemn people who identify as gay but holds that all sexual activity outside of heterosexual marriage is immoral, and it believes life begins at conception — he has distinctly changed his tone compared to previous popes. Francis stresses that the Church must not become so obsessed with these social issues that it forgets other important components of the faith. These social and sexual issues are a recurring sticking point for modern Catholics and lie at the heart of why many have left the Church. When it comes to changing behavior in the public realm, persuasion is preferred over coercive rhetoric, such as threatening excommunication (Milakovich & Gordon, 2012, p. 36).
Persuasion Over Coercion in Public Administration
This is an important principle for all government officials in public administration to remember. It is not enough for a policy to be correct; the issue must also be presented effectively in order to motivate people to act. Condemning people for using birth control has clearly not been persuasive. Setting a good example through charity and compassion might actually make modern people more open to hearing other aspects of the Church's message. Indirect persuasion is often more motivating than direct persuasion — that is, simply telling people they "should" return to the Church because it is God's will and change their behaviors (Milakovich & Gordon, 2012, p. 264). In the past, the Church's presentation of issues regarding sexuality shut down dialogue rather than opening it up. Francis' style is more likely to bring people back to the Church, to hear the gospel, and to change their ways through exposure to the warmth of the Christian community, rather than being alienated by talk of sin and damnation.
References
Goodstein, L. (2013). Pope bluntly faults Church's focus on gays and abortion. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/20/world/europe/pope-bluntly-faults-churchs-focus-on-gays-and-abortion.html
Milakovich, M., & Gordon, G. (2012). Public administration in America (11th ed.). Cengage.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.