Poverty and Mental Health: A Bidirectional Relationship

Introduction

To affirm the social reality under examination, a statement made by the World Health Organization in 1995 provides a powerful starting point: "The world's most ruthless killer and the greatest cause of suffering on earth is extreme poverty." This statement clarifies that financial deprivation is a driving factor behind adverse mental health outcomes. Socially, poverty can be defined as a multidimensional phenomenon encompassing the lack of individual capabilities to meet basic human needs, the lack of resources for human survival, the lack of education, and deprived physical health. Sociologists find poverty to be intrinsically alienating and distressing for those who live with it. A number of psychiatrists collectively conclude that poverty produces adverse impacts that hinder the treatment of problems associated with one's emotions, behaviors, and psyche.

Poverty can be measured on the basis of an earnings-to-consumption ratio. This ratio falls into the poverty category when consumption significantly exceeds the income of an individual (Burstein, 2005). When the value calculated by this ratio falls below the poverty line — the minimum level required for meeting essential survival needs — individuals are considered poor in one form or another. It can therefore be observed that poverty carries significant implications for both the physical and mental condition of individuals.

This research paper discusses poverty and its impacts on the psychological condition of individuals, while investigating the probable justifications for the association between these two phenomena. Distinguishing between absolute and relative poverty is important for countries where people live in detrimental conditions with inadequate shelter, food, and facilities that are insufficient to meet the true potential of society as a whole (Townsend, 1979). Individuals with mental disorders often experience chronically poor living conditions (Williamson, 1999). Conversely, it is also a frequently observed fact that poverty presents significant risk factors for both the physical and mental health of individuals. The relationship between poverty and mental illness is bidirectional — both easily understandable in its basic form and deeply complex in its far-reaching effects. This paper aims to explore the impacts of poverty on the mental health of people in a Canadian social context, while also examining how mental illness can itself lead to poverty over time.

In general terms, poverty refers to the lack of sufficient income relative to the basic needs of individuals within a particular social setting. This paper adopts a broader definition provided by the Policy Research Initiative, a research institution that advises Human Resources and Social Development Canada: "Nationally and internationally, there is growing recognition that poverty involves more than just income deprivation. It can also extend to — or result from — exclusion from essential goods and services, meaningful employment and decent earnings, adequate and affordable housing, safe neighborhoods with public amenities, health and well-being, social networks, and basic human rights" (Burstein, 2005).

For measuring poverty levels in Canada, the Low Income Cut-Off (LICO) statistic is used frequently. For Canadian residents, LICO is informally considered the "poverty line" (Williamson, 1999). LICO defines a family income threshold below which a household is expected to spend a disproportionately large share of its earnings on basic necessities — food, shelter, and clothing — compared to average families in the region. Any family with annual earnings below that cut-off is considered to have low income. According to 2009 LICO statistics, individuals earning below $18,260 in a mid-sized community were experiencing poverty, as they were expected to spend an additional 20% of their income on primary survival needs compared to others.

Poverty from a Canadian Perspective

It is virtually impossible to meet every basic necessity of life — including food, shelter, employment, and education — without an adequate income. Poverty within society can be evaluated by measuring both the extent to which people fall below the poverty line and the number of years they remain there. Notably, those living with disabilities are at higher risk of chronic poverty than others, and among these individuals, many are those who are also struggling with mental illness.

Individuals dealing with severe mental health problems face numerous social and financial barriers throughout their lives. Social barriers — particularly stigma and discrimination — impede their ability to obtain adequate education and employment, which in turn creates serious financial hardship. Mental health disorders typically disrupt education or career development, resulting in reduced employment opportunities within the broader social setting. Diminished prospects for stable employment directly affect a person's ability to earn adequate income and achieve financial stability, ultimately leading many into poverty.

Research in this field has also reported that, due to stigma, discrimination, and gaps in services, people with serious mental illness frequently find it difficult to access community supports and services. These individuals are also exposed to insufficient community mental health care, a lack of affordable housing, and inadequate income support — all of which further separate them from mainstream social life. Exclusion from social and economic supports contributes to social isolation, which rapidly increases the risk of ongoing poverty.

Individuals facing work-limiting disabilities are approximately three times more likely to be poor than those without disabilities, while the probability of requiring social assistance is nearly four times higher for mentally disabled individuals than for others. Canada launched the Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP) for individuals with serious mental illness; this program currently provides income support to more than 77,430 people within Canada (Krupa, 2005). However, the rates of ODSP financial assistance remain well below the amount required to cover expenditures on primary necessities, including food, clothing, and housing.

How People with Chronic Mental Illness Experience Poverty

Many mentally disabled individuals who are awaiting ODSP benefits access Ontario Works (OW) in the interim — a publicly funded income support program designed for those with temporary financial needs. OW recipients receive approximately half the financial support granted to ODSP recipients. Recent statistics indicate that support granted through either program falls far below a standard subsistence level: individuals supported by ODSP are 35% below the poverty line, while those supported by OW are 63% below it (Krupa, 2005).

On average, individuals with mental disabilities tend to have lower educational attainment than those without mental illness. Research in this area consistently finds that mental disorders often emerge during the early developmental years or early adulthood — precisely the period during which formal education is underway (Thoits, 1999). Such educational disruptions have a lasting impact, reducing employment opportunities over the course of a person's life. Supportive educational programs tailored to the needs of adults with mental illness should be provided so that their educational goals can still be achieved.

Beyond serving as a source of financial support, employment provides individuals with a sense of self-respect and social belonging. However, those with mental illness are frequently subject to interrupted career development and reduced long-term employment prospects. A Community Health Survey conducted in Canada found that, in Ontario, approximately 30% of individuals with a formally diagnosed mental illness were not working in 2009 (Battle et al., 2009). These figures are likely conservative, as the survey excluded individuals diagnosed with psychosis who were unemployed at the time.

It is challenging for mentally ill individuals to retain employment over time due to the cyclic nature of their conditions (Thoits, 1999). However, research also shows that, despite difficult employment histories, work itself serves as an important factor in the recovery of many people with mental illness. Supportive employment programs and workplace accommodations are expected to increase the probability of recovery by helping individuals find and maintain meaningful work.

Individuals with access to safe and affordable housing are more likely to live mentally stable and satisfying lives. Stable shelter significantly increases the likelihood of maintaining the structured lifestyle needed to pursue employment and other constructive activities. During recent economic downturns, the cost of accommodation has continued to rise — reaching approximately 30% higher than in the 1990s (Battle et al., 2009). This economic pressure has worsened mental health conditions for many Canadians, contributing to high rates of depression and, in some cases, chronic mental illness.

Current rent supplements and public housing available to mentally ill individuals in Canada are severely limited, covering fewer than half of those in need. The remaining 54% of citizens are obligated to pay market-rate rent, leaving them with very little — or nothing — for other basic needs such as nutritious food, clothing, and other necessities. A framework published by the Canadian Mental Health Association identifies income, education, housing, and employment as essential components of recovery from serious mental illness.

Conclusion

Saunders, R. (2006). Risk and opportunity: Creating options for vulnerable workers. Vulnerable Workers Series, 7.

Thoits, P. (1999). Sociological approaches to mental illness. Sociology, 8, 129–134.

Thornton, C., & Carter, J. (1975). Improving mental health services to low income Blacks. Journal of the National Medical Association, 67(2), 167–170.

Williamson, D., & Reutter, L. (1999). Defining and measuring poverty: Implications for the health of Canadians. Health Promotion International, 14, 355–364.