This paper analyzes the John Lasseter case study through the lens of organizational power dynamics, identifying multiple forms of interpersonal power including coercive, legitimate, and reward power. The author examines how Lasseter's decision to bypass the chain of command at Disney Studios ultimately led to his termination, demonstrating how centralized power can be wielded unethically for personal gain. The paper concludes that Lasseter's firing was not an ethical use of power, as his immediate supervisors prioritized personal grievances over professional objectives. A personal anecdote about workplace politics in retail further illustrates how arbitrary exercise of authority can harm individuals without organizational justification.
Several forms of interpersonal power are evident within the Lasseter case study. Foremost among these is coercive power, which is subservient to relationship power in terms of empowering the individual (Boldt et al., 2007, p. 43–44). Since Lasseter went above his immediate supervisors to get approval for a pilot for computerized animation, his immediate supervisors coerced the studio head to dislike the idea and ultimately used their influence against it. This same coercive power was responsible for Lasseter's firing after the failed pilot.
The case also demonstrates legitimate power, as Lasseter obtained his positions at Disney and Pixar through his own prowess at animation. Reward power is similarly evident, as Lasseter was able to reward Jobs for employing him by making stellar contributions to the company. These three forms of power—coercive, legitimate, and reward—intersect throughout the case to create a complex dynamic of influence and control.
The two faces of power appear in this case in that there are situations in which power is both centralized and decentralized, and used for both negative and positive purposes. The centralized, political hierarchy that Lasseter encountered, which ultimately led to his firing, is demonstrative of the centralized, negative potential of power. The fact that he was able to move to another company and eventually implement his animation idea there demonstrates the decentralized, positive facet of power. This contrast reveals how organizational structure directly influences whether power serves organizational goals or personal interests.
The firing of John Lasseter from Disney Studios does not demonstrate the ethical use of power. It is clear from an analysis of the events that Lasseter was fired for personal reasons, which largely conflicted with the professional aims of Disney Studios. Because Lasseter had forsaken some of the mechanisms of power in those studios—specifically the vaunted chain of command—and had gone above his direct superiors, those individuals ensured that Lasseter would regret doing so by effecting his termination.
Lasseter's firing is a clear demonstration of personal interests conflicting with professional ones. His immediate superiors did not approve of the fact that he had bypassed them; consequently, they did not like him. Since they did not like him, they made a deliberate point to utilize their power for personal reasons and secure his firing, which constitutes unethical behavior. Rather than evaluating Lasseter's work on its merits or considering what was best for the organization, these supervisors prioritized their own wounded pride and desire for retribution.
"Connects termination to breach of hierarchical expectations and resentment"
"Parallels case study with retail sector example of arbitrary authority exercise"
You’re 52% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.