This paper examines prejudice and discrimination in the workplace, with a focus on the phenomenon of mobbing — the systematic bullying of an employee by coworkers. Using a scenario involving a gay employee who is socially excluded and harassed by his colleagues, the paper illustrates how mobbing constitutes a form of workplace discrimination rooted in differences in sexual orientation, beliefs, and culture. The paper draws on research to show that much workplace discrimination is unintentional and invisible, manifesting in everyday activities rather than overt acts. It also discusses the serious consequences of mobbing, including deteriorating mental health, loss of dignity, and potential legal liability for employers.
The paper demonstrates applied definition and classification: it introduces a specific incident, labels the behavior using defined academic terminology (mobbing), and then explains why that behavior falls within a broader legal and ethical category (discrimination). This moves the argument from observation to analysis to consequence, a useful structure for ethics-focused writing.
The paper opens with a conceptual definition of prejudice, then presents a narrative scenario illustrating the concept. It follows with two analytical sections: one explaining why the behavior constitutes mobbing and discrimination, and another outlining the consequences of such behavior for the victim and the employer. The references section cites two sources in APA format, one from a human rights commission and one from a business publication.
Prejudice is a favorable or unfavorable judgment or opinion toward a person or group based on one's perception of an individual, group, or situation. Prejudice and discrimination in the working environment are serious offenses that can result in severe penalties. Prejudice in the workplace usually arises because the working environment is composed of people from varying social, cultural, and racial backgrounds — individuals who may have little in common beyond the fact that they work together. While prejudice sometimes emerges as intentional unfavorable judgment, it can also take the form of comments or behaviors that are expressed innocently but are experienced as harmful or exclusionary.
An example of a scenario in which an employee may feel he has been treated with prejudice involves a gay worker who is regularly talked about at work as if he is not present ("Resolving Human Rights Issues in the Workplace," n.d.). The employee's work is quite demanding and usually requires him to collaborate with his colleagues, yet they tend to isolate him most of the time. For instance, when the birthdays of all other employees are celebrated, he is not invited, and his birthday is the only one not acknowledged. While carrying out his responsibilities, his coworkers do not respond to his requests for contributions in a timely manner and joke about leaving him without support. As a result, he has become increasingly frustrated to the point that his mental health has begun to deteriorate. Even though he had stable mental health for many years before joining this work group, his symptoms have started flaring up in the past few months.
The actions of this work group toward the gay employee amount to prejudice based on his sexual orientation. These actions constitute mobbing — the constant, systematic bullying of a person by his or her coworkers. Mobbing is a practice that occurs in the workplace through peer pressure and usually involves several coworkers, making it comparable to bullying among children in schools. Mobbing is, in fact, more prevalent in the working environment than other destructive behaviors such as racial discrimination and sexual harassment. Employees are particularly vulnerable to mobbing in environments composed of people from different backgrounds, beliefs, and cultures. It occurs when workers do not share similar beliefs, gender identities, levels of competence, or sexual orientations. In the case of the gay employee, mobbing was carried out because his colleagues did not share his sexual orientation.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.