Prince Hotel HR Case: Wrongful Termination & Harassment
This paper examines a workplace HR dilemma at Prince Hotel in which an HR professional must decide whether to proceed with the termination of an employee, Ms. Haunani Flow, despite an anonymous note alleging sexual harassment by a manager, Mr. Stone. The paper advises delaying the termination, conducting a thorough investigation, and consulting legal counsel to avoid wrongful termination liability and Title VII violations. It also addresses how to handle pressure from Mr. Stone, what information must be clarified before any termination decision, and the role of a third-party HR provider in ensuring a fair and legally compliant process.
- Introduction and Immediate Recommendation: Advises delaying Ms. Flow's termination pending investigation
- Conducting the Investigation: Steps for gathering evidence and interviewing witnesses
- Legal Risks and HR Responsibilities: Wrongful termination and harassment liability risks explained
- Handling Pressure from Mr. Stone: How to respond if Stone demands immediate termination
- Key Issues to Clarify Before Termination: Unresolved factual and policy questions requiring answers
- ProService's Role and Long-Term Guidance: Third-party HR support for fair, impartial investigation
- Employment Law Considerations: Title VII, at-will doctrine, and wage-and-hour law
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper takes a clear, actionable advisory stance from the outset, immediately recommending a specific course of action and explaining why, which keeps the argument focused and practical.
- It integrates relevant employment law — including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and at-will employment doctrine — directly into the analysis rather than treating legal considerations as an afterthought.
- Each section addresses a distinct stakeholder concern (the HR professional, Mr. Stone, and the third-party provider), giving the paper a well-organized, problem-solution structure.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied legal reasoning in a professional HR context. Rather than simply stating rules, it maps legal obligations (e.g., the duty to investigate harassment under Title VII, wage-and-hour law requirements) onto a specific fact pattern, showing how abstract statutes translate into concrete procedural steps. This technique is characteristic of strong HR and business law case analyses.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an immediate recommendation, then moves systematically through the investigation process, legal risk assessment, stakeholder communication, and unresolved factual questions. It closes with a summary of the governing employment law principles. This funnel structure — from urgent action to broader legal context — mirrors the format of a professional HR advisory memo.
Introduction and Immediate Recommendation
In advising on how to proceed this Friday afternoon, the recommendation is to delay the termination meeting with Ms. Haunani Flow. The meeting should be postponed, at minimum, so that a proper investigation into the allegations against Mr. Stone and Ms. Flow can be conducted. The anonymous note raises serious concerns about potential misconduct, and it is unwise to act hastily without more evidence. Doing so could expose the hotel to significant legal liability. It is equally important to emphasize that conducting due diligence is necessary both to protect the hotel's reputation and to comply with applicable employment laws governing termination.
Conducting the Investigation
Once the termination has been delayed, the next step for Prince Hotel is to conduct a thorough investigation into the claims made in the anonymous note, as well as the allegations against Ms. Flow. This process requires gathering evidence and conducting interviews with witnesses, including employees who may have observed interactions between Mr. Stone and Ms. Flow. The hotel should review its records for any prior complaints Ms. Flow may have filed against Mr. Stone, as suggested in the anonymous note. The hotel should also engage ProService's legal team to ensure that all investigative steps remain within the bounds of the law throughout this process.
Legal Risks and HR Responsibilities
The legal risks must be clearly communicated in order to justify delaying the termination. Wrongful termination and the failure to properly investigate harassment claims could both serve as grounds for a lawsuit. The HR professional involved should be made aware of the potential personal and organizational consequences of failing to follow proper procedures. It is also important to highlight the value of HR in safeguarding employee rights and company integrity. ProService can provide ongoing guidance throughout the process to ensure that professional and legal responsibilities are fulfilled at every stage.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.