This paper examines the procurement function in business, focusing on three distinct organizational levels: project-level procurement, business unit procurement, and centralized corporate procurement. For each level, the paper identifies key advantages and disadvantages, discusses the role of management, and considers the trade-offs between cost efficiency and operational flexibility. The analysis draws on established sources to illustrate how procurement strategies must align with an organization's size, structure, and objectives. The paper concludes that no single procurement model is universally optimal, and that effective procurement must balance cost savings with the acquisition of genuinely necessary goods and services.
One of the most important functions of business is procurement. Procurement refers to the acquisition of the goods and services a company needs to carry out its functions and to operate within its market. It is therefore vital that this process be implemented and streamlined in such a way as to optimize not only the business process, but also to maximize economic activity. There are several levels of procurement, three of which include the project level, the business unit level, and the corporate level.
In a project-based organization with project-based procurement, procurement occurs — as the name suggests — on the basis of the necessities required for each individual project (Lynch, n.d.). Once project objectives are predetermined in the project proposal, procurement activities can also be undertaken to correspond to those objectives. This kind of procurement is vital to the success of a project.
One disadvantage of project-level procurement is that each project must be very closely scrutinized for its procurement needs. This creates a dependency on the specific objectives and goals of each project, and can therefore require additional resources in terms of time and money. Another disadvantage is that project procurement is not a uniform process and cannot be implemented with equal speed or institutional knowledge across all projects. On the other hand, a key advantage is focus. Project procurement provides a targeted platform of specific requirements, which eliminates the acquisition of surplus or unnecessary bulk materials, resulting in cost savings.
The project manager's function is to coordinate project procurement with the necessary elements of the process (Crawford, 2014). This function includes not only planning, but also the identification of outsourcing needs, market analysis, and contract planning.
While many large companies opt for a centralized corporate procurement process, companies on their way to reaching that scale often begin with a more segmented procurement approach. In such cases, procurement occurs in the form of business unit procurement. According to McBeath (2010), this type of procurement occurs in a localized way, where each division of the company handles its own procurement processes.
The main disadvantage of this approach is that the procurement process can become increasingly fragmented as the company grows. This fragmentation may lead to a less-than-optimized focus when procuring goods and services, particularly in organizations that grow so rapidly that little time or effort remains to develop procurement capabilities alongside the rest of the business.
"Global integrated procurement trade-offs and cost savings"
When conducting business, it is essential that procurement be conducted in such a way that optimal results are achieved in terms of both cost savings and the acquisition of necessities. No business can survive without attending carefully to either consideration.
You’re 71% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.