This paper presents a three-year pricing and product strategy based on cost-volume-profit (CVP) analysis and product lifecycle management. By analyzing three tablet models—the mature X5, established X6, and emerging X7—the study demonstrates how dynamic pricing strategies can balance short-term revenue maximization with long-term portfolio optimization. The approach adjusts prices and R&D budgets annually based on market position, price elasticity, and lifecycle stage, moving from the static strategy of the previous analysis to a more responsive framework that accounts for changing competitive conditions and customer preferences.
Time warp 2 provided increased knowledge regarding the market and the way in which CVP (cost-volume-profit) could be used to improve decisions regarding pricing. Time has reset, and the CVP analysis along with the results from the previous scenario may be used to develop a more effective strategy. Adjustments to the strategy will be made, learning from time warp 2 and addressing its limitations.
The assessment from the past time warp indicated that the X5 has only a limited life and is well into the product lifecycle. It may be argued that the reluctance to discontinue this item until 2015 may not have been an optimal result. While the X5 was available, there was less likelihood that customers buying the firm's tablets would move to the more profitable models of the X6 or the X7. Although the X5 produces some revenue, with most sales being replacement due to the high level of market penetration in later years, the continuation of the X5 until 2015 presents the firm with an opportunity cost in those later years.
However, it is also apparent that in 2012 a good profit was realized from the X5, and during this year the X7 had not yet been fully established in the marketplace. There is still value to be gained, and as such strategies to maximize short-term sales of the X5 should be pursued. The overall strategy will be to use prices to maximize potential sales, increasing market share while optimizing profit by ensuring that a good contribution margin is achieved.
At the same time, the firm also needs to look to the future, investing in products that have the potential to benefit from improvements. This means paying close attention to product lifecycle stages and avoiding unnecessary costs. The strategy will therefore vary compared to time warp 2, where prices were set for the entire period and did not change, and only small changes were made to the R&D budget. Here, pricing and investment will adjust annually based on market conditions and lifecycle position.
The strategy will be considered on a year-to-year basis, as managing product lifecycles requires changes across the years. In 2012, there will be a change in strategy compared to the previous analysis. In time warp 2, the price of the X5 was reduced to $270, with the aim of increasing sales, and the R&D budget was reduced to zero due to the lifecycle stage. In this time warp, a similar strategy will be pursued with further optimization.
To increase sales and benefit from the X5's remaining life, the price may be reduced further than seen in time warp 2. It was found in the past time warp that customers for the X5 were highly price sensitive, which indicates a level of elasticity suggesting that decreasing the price may create a disproportionate increase in sales. In time warp 3, the price will be reduced to $220, leaving a low profit per unit but making the product more attractive to a price-sensitive market. R&D will be reduced to zero, as the product is in decline and further investment cannot be justified.
The X6 is an important model, with a potential market of 6,000,000 remaining units. The X6 is likely to be attractive to the market as it offers a higher level of performance than the X5 and stands up well to competition. As this is a premium product, the pricing should reflect its position. Market research indicates that consumers for this product care more about performance than price, suggesting potential for a price increase—a strategy used in the past. However, in previous time warps, price increases for the X6 have not resulted in sufficient levels of long-term growth. This time, the price will be left at the 2011 level of $430.
While market information indicates that the market is not price sensitive, consumers do not completely disregard price. The product must remain competitive, and maintaining this price level may help gain more market share and momentum. A further change will be made to the R&D budget compared to time warp 2. The X6 has been on the market for two years, and a significant increase in the R&D budget may be misplaced and present a high opportunity cost. The R&D budget will be maintained at 34%, allowing continued development for an established product without overspending.
The X7 is a new product that has only been on the market for one year. In the past scenario, CVP analysis was used to assess an optimum level of production to maximize revenues. However, there is also a need to recoup sunk costs, and because the product is new, pricing strategy becomes particularly important. In this market, consumers care about both cost and performance. Price can be seen as part of a positioning strategy, so for 2012 there will be continuation with a higher price, still below the X5 price level. However, the R&D budget will not be increased above the 2011 level. Just because an R&D budget is available does not mean it should be used. This is a product already developed and on the market; the existing budget will allow for continued development without excessive investment.
The first major change from time warp 2 is the discontinuation of the X5 in 2013. It has high overheads, and the X7 may be a suitable replacement for those who wish to replace their X5 devices. The price for the X6 will remain at the same level as 2012, as this market is not price sensitive. The R&D budget will also remain at 34%, as the product appeared to remain competitive and should continue to receive support to maintain that position.
The X7 is now at a stage where it needs to grab market share. It is likely to be seen as a premium product in the range, with the higher pricing supporting a premium positioning. However, the company now needs to act to gain a higher level of market penetration. Reducing the price to $99 should get the attention of price-sensitive consumers and increase sales significantly. This aggressive pricing moves the X7 into a more competitive tier while maintaining its quality perception.
"Final lifecycle adjustments and market exit planning"
The strategy that can be applied is likely to help support profit-making by adapting prices and support for products based on their lifecycle stage. While CVP analysis provides a quantitative foundation, other issues—such as pricing strategy, market positioning, and opportunity cost—are also essential to improve overall strategy. By dynamically adjusting pricing and investment across the portfolio, the firm can optimize both near-term profitability and long-term competitive position.
You’re 86% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.